<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://blackwiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=184.147.131.85&amp;*</id>
	<title>blackwiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://blackwiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=184.147.131.85&amp;*"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/184.147.131.85"/>
	<updated>2026-06-10T08:58:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Fatimid_desecration_of_Jerusalem&amp;diff=4179385</id>
		<title>Template:Did you know nominations/Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Fatimid_desecration_of_Jerusalem&amp;diff=4179385"/>
		<updated>2015-11-13T15:22:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;184.147.131.85: suggest renaming to a neutral title&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DYKsubpage&lt;br /&gt;
|monthyear=October 2015 &lt;br /&gt;
|passed=&amp;lt;!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2=&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK conditions}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem====&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem|Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right; margin-left:0.5em;&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;mp-dyk-img&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{main page image|image=Golgotha cross-section.svg|caption=[[Church of the Holy Sepulchre]] destroyed by [[Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                   Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ... that the [[Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem]] was ordered by a [[Mad Caliph]] who self-proclaimed himself to be the [[Mahdi]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Created by [[User:Guru Noel|Guru Noel]] ([[User talk:Guru Noel|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
* {{DYKmake|Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem|Guru Noel|subpage=Fatimid desecration of Jerusalem}}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Considerably problematic in its current form. The article is new enough and (barely) long enough, but I cannot judge it as within policy. Both article and hook present an exceedingly non-neutral point of view regarding the controversial historical figure [[Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah]]. The second paragraph is entirely unreferenced. Whatever the Morris 2005 reference is isn't formatted correctly; it appears to be taken from another article that used shortened footnotes and harvard referencing. Because of this problem, I cannot verify claims sources to it; this is especially problematic because it appears to take the writings of [[Adémar de Chabannes]] at face value, which further compounds NPOV concerns. Indeed, the article title itself is problematic, with an alternative such as [[Destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre]] perhaps being preferable, if it is even determined that this is a necessary spinout from [[Church of the Holy Sepulchre]]. In any case, this article, as it stands currently, is not in my opinion suitable for display on the Main Page. [[User:Squeamish Ossifrage|Squeamish Ossifrage]] ([[User talk:Squeamish Ossifrage|talk]]) 16:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::* '''Comment''' Thanks for your review. The article has now been substantially re-written to better show clear title is correct and the scope of the desecration to Jewish and Christian sites outside of Jerusalem. Morris source has been replaced. [[User:Guru Noel|Guru Noel]] ([[User talk:Guru Noel|talk]]) 21:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Still no. This article, from title to text to proposed DYK hook, presents an exceedingly Western/Judeo-Christian biased accounting of the 1009 destruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and its consequences. Neglecting any consideration of the Fatimid perspective is not neutral. Deeming the destruction of the church the &amp;quot;desecration of Jerusalem&amp;quot; is not neutral. Newly-added text equating the actions of Al-Haqim with the Biblical [[abomination of desolation]] phrase is ''absolutely'' not neutral. The proposed hook is worse, essentially using the words of Adémar de Chabannes to call Al-Haqim the Antichrist. The article's topic is a complex, nuanced, and sensitive event. The article itself is not; I will not approve it for DYK. [[User:Squeamish Ossifrage|Squeamish Ossifrage]] ([[User talk:Squeamish Ossifrage|talk]]) 02:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*'''Comment''' Excuse me, but the entire of Wikipedia is Western/Judeo-Christian biased accounting! What do you think our University system is based on? There are no Fatimid perspectives, they all likely killed Al-Hakim. We don't give [[Hitler]]'s perspective on the [[holocaust]] because no-one (or a negligible minority) support his view and think that was a good thing to have done. I don't think you have re-read the article carefully enough to notice that the &amp;quot;desecration&amp;quot; extended beyond the Church of the Holy Sepulchre at all and with that sort of neglect request another reviewer's attention to this article. I have however changed the hook on your advice to make it suitable. [[User:Guru Noel|Guru Noel]] ([[User talk:Guru Noel|talk]]) 08:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::* Wikipedia is built on consensus; you are welcome to seek a second opinion, although I assure you that I examined the article, its claims, and its sourcing quite thoroughly. An appropriately balanced, neutral article on the topic would need to address scholars' opinions of Al-Haqim's motivations (which will probably need to address his shifting religious allegiances), such as concerns that the [[Holy Fire]] was fraudulent,[http://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/M.CELAMA-EB.3.1476] or that the destruction was potentially taken as a consequence of the complex [[Byzantine–Arab wars (780–1180)|Byzantine-Arab relations]] during the period.[http://www.jstor.org/stable/1523174?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents] A neutral article will also need to take a more measured approach to the chain of events connecting the 1009 destruction of the church to the First Crusade. [[Rodulfus Glaber]] probably needs to be addressed along with Adémar, and context needs to be provided for their writings (Adémar especially was prone to hyperbole or outright fabrication). The First Crusade's causes were more complex and nuanced; indeed, Al-Haqim was long dead and the church rebuilt before the Crusades were even conceived of. Not all scholars agree whether its destruction was even mentioned by Urban II at Clermont.[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-229X.1970.tb02491.x/abstract] And, finally, it goes without saying that a neutral article would require neutral ''language''. This is simply not Hitler and the Holocaust. [[User:Squeamish Ossifrage|Squeamish Ossifrage]] ([[User talk:Squeamish Ossifrage|talk]]) 14:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::* Thanks for these helpful pointers. It is more complex than the Holocaust. I have made an attempt to incorporate a lot of this information with a new motivations section and clarified the crusades. [[User:Guru Noel|Guru Noel]] ([[User talk:Guru Noel|talk]]) 21:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  The article is much improved from the state at its original DYK nomination, but I am still not comfortable approving this for DYK. I retain the belief that the title is problematic, and that some of the phrasing (especially, but not limited to, &amp;quot;abomination of desolation&amp;quot;) is far from neutral. It remains my opinion that this is not suitable, but the nominator has requested a third party reviewer, and I have no objection to someone else giving the article due consideration. [[User:Squeamish Ossifrage|Squeamish Ossifrage]] ([[User talk:Squeamish Ossifrage|talk]]) 14:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*Thank you for your valuable contribution Squeamish. Much appreciated. I have taken the [[Abomination of desolation]] topic up on the talk page and further discussion is welcome there, not limited to that but other possibly problematic phrasing I am open to address. I understand your concerns about title and am open to discussion about that, also the hook. This article has become a bit of a [[Sherlock Holmes]] [[Whodunit]] case since I started it. After a lot of researching it seems likely in my opinion that [[Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah]] did likely have a Christian mother and did likely execute his uncle Arsenius, Patriarch of Jerusalem as part of the &amp;quot;desecration&amp;quot; for the Holy Fire fraud on the suggestion of the disenchanted Christian monk John, making the whole matter a lot more involved than generally understood, prior to writing the article. I think this clarification of multiple complicity actually presents a great message of peace right now, with everything going on with Shi'ite Muslims and Christians in Syria. Perhaps a revised hook and some advice could put that message across on the main page to your better satisfaction? [[User:Guru Noel|Guru Noel]] ([[User talk:Guru Noel|talk]]) 15:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I saw this article on the list of older nominations and came to request it be renamed something more neutral. CF comparable neutral titles [[1660 destruction of Tiberias]] or [[Destruction of Psara]].[[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.85|184.147.131.85]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.85|talk]]) 15:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{-}}}}&amp;lt;!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>184.147.131.85</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Lizzie_Halliday&amp;diff=4299937</id>
		<title>Template:Did you know nominations/Lizzie Halliday</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Lizzie_Halliday&amp;diff=4299937"/>
		<updated>2015-10-26T19:54:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;184.147.131.85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DYKsubpage&lt;br /&gt;
|monthyear=September 2015 &lt;br /&gt;
|passed=&amp;lt;!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2=&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK conditions}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Lizzie Halliday====&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Lizzie Halliday|Lizzie Halliday}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right; margin-left:0.5em;&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;mp-dyk-img&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{main page image|image=Lizzie Halliday (Eliza Margaret McNally).png|caption=Lizzie Halliday}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                   Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ... that serial killer '''[[Lizzie Halliday]]''' was the first woman sentenced to die in the [[electric chair]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&lt;br /&gt;
:* &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Created by [[User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|Fountains of Bryn Mawr]] ([[User talk:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:29, 23 September 2015 (UTC).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
* {{DYKmake|Lizzie Halliday|Fountains of Bryn Mawr|subpage=Lizzie Halliday}}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good. ~'''''[[User:Editorofthewiki|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F900&amp;quot;&amp;gt;EDDY&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'' &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Editorofthewiki|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;Green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;Green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;contribs&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;~ 16:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::*Please conduct a full review that addresses the DYK criteria. [[User:SSTflyer|sst]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|flyer]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::* [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Needs a full review. '''[[User:Jim Carter|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jim&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Car&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFCC00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ter&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]''' 15:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::* comment only - Interesting woman - its obvious that you have tried to avoid some of the more sensationalist reports.- looking down the sources I see that some are called blogs. Those that are recounting newspaper verbatim seem fine (to me) - although you could include the newspaper details in a ref and use the blog as the url. The John Conway blog seems fine but this is one man making his own posting without any peer review or references - I would avoid this if poss [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 13:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK on P, H, L, N, Q [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 07:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Not a review. New reviewer needed to give and write the full review requested. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 14:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Full review has been provided. Cleared for queue. If you don't like the review provided, write your own, it will take 10 minutes. Don't hold up [[User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|Fountains of Bryn Mawr]]'s nom for a second month. It is discourteous to the hard work he put into this. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 17:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  If you would at least expand &amp;quot;P, H, L, N, Q&amp;quot;, this might be an acceptable review, but frankly, no promoting admin would be able to tell what you have checked and what you haven't, so this can not be considered reviewed. Given that you presumably ''have'' completed a full review, why don't you avoid being &amp;quot;discourteous to the hard work he put into this&amp;quot; by providing an adequate review that people can understand? [[User:Harrias|&amp;lt;b style=&amp;quot;color:#00cc33&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Harrias&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Harrias|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#009900&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;Del&amp;gt;[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  I find it impossible to believe that anyone who spent some amount of time promoting articles at DYK would be perplexed to the point of paralysis by the use of abbreviations for Policy, Hook, Length, Newness, and QPQ (the last of which, itself, is an abbreviation!). Since that's impossible to believe, there must be some other issue with the review and it would be better if I defer to another editor to do it. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 08:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)&amp;lt;/del&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:LavaBaron/DYKAbbreviations|C&amp;amp;Px5]] [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 08:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]The hook as stated does not appear in the article, which refers only to the first woman to be sentenced in the jurisdiction of New York State.[[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.85|184.147.131.85]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.85|talk]]) 19:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{-}}}}&amp;lt;!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>184.147.131.85</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Melipona_beecheii&amp;diff=4326774</id>
		<title>Template:Did you know nominations/Melipona beecheii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Melipona_beecheii&amp;diff=4326774"/>
		<updated>2015-10-16T16:21:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;184.147.131.85: ready to go&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DYKsubpage&lt;br /&gt;
|monthyear=September 2015 &lt;br /&gt;
|passed=&amp;lt;!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2=&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK conditions}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Melipona beecheii====&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Melipona beecheii|Melipona beecheii}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                   Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ... that '''''[[Melipona beecheii]]''''' were considered by the Mayan Indians to be an endowment of their god [[Ah-Muzen-Cab]] and were the focus of many Mayan religious ceremonies?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Created &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;and expanded&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; by [[User:Mebennett49|Mebennett49]] ([[User talk:Mebennett49|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
* {{DYKmake|Melipona beecheii|Mebennett49|subpage=Melipona beecheii}}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;lt;!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING   :*   --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Article: New – The article was created nine days before the nomination on Sept 30. Between Sept 23 and Sept 30 it was expanded fourfold.&lt;br /&gt;
* Article: Long enough – The article is 16,000 bytes.&lt;br /&gt;
* Article: Within policy – The article is written neutrally. It cites 14 sources, some sentence-by-sentence and some at the end of paragraphs. The sources are all offline, except one; that one is in Spanish, a language I do not read. So we will have to take on faith that there are no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hook: Format – The hook is 147 characters and formatted like the others.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hook: Content - The hook is interesting. It is neutral and does not affect a living person. The hook fact is in the article, but not cited with a citation at the end of the sentence. &lt;br /&gt;
* Other: QPQ – The nominator has no other DYK credits so this is not required.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right; margin-left:0.5em;&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;mp-dyk-img&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{main page image|image=Melipona sp Female.jpg|caption=''Melipona beecheii''}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Other: An image was not nominated but a free image is available, as used in the article. See ---&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Conclusion: {{Ping|Mebennett49}}, please add a citation to the end of the hook sentence in the article. When that is done, this would be ready to go, assuming the editors here don't mind the slightly longer time period to nomination. By the way, would you consider changing &amp;quot;endowment of&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;gift from&amp;quot; to make the hook read more smoothly? Finally, congratulations on a great article, your hard work shows. [[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.85|184.147.131.85]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.85|talk]]) 15:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Unfortunately, it looks like this article was created on September 21, which is more than seven says prior to the September 30 nomination. Per DYK Rule 1(a), {{tq|For DYK purposes, a &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; article is no more than seven days old, and may not consist of text spun off from a pre-existing article.&amp;quot;}} However, this article could be eligible again if it is improved to GA status (see rule 1(g)). Best, -- [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]) 17:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Although it was created on September 21, [[WP:DYKcheck|DYKcheck]] reports that it was five times expanded starting on September 24. As a five times expansion, it was nominated on time. [[User:Mebennett49|Mebennett49]] should add the requested citation, and then this can proceed. [[User:Mandarax|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;AN&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;ARAX&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;•&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#999900&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;XAЯA&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;ИA&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 19:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{u|Mandarax}}, it looks like you are right and I was wrong. My apologies for causing any confusion. I have struck my earlier inaccurate comment. Thanks, -- [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]) 19:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hi there, I believe I added the necessary citation to the article. Thanks so much for the guidance, advice, and feedback! [[User:Mebennett49|Mebennett49]] ([[User talk:Mebennett49|talk]]) 16:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Mebennett49&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]Thanks! Assuming good faith on the citation (since the source is paywalled and I'm not able to read it), this is now good to go. [[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.85|184.147.131.85]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.85|talk]]) 16:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>184.147.131.85</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Melipona_beecheii&amp;diff=4326764</id>
		<title>Template:Did you know nominations/Melipona beecheii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blackwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Melipona_beecheii&amp;diff=4326764"/>
		<updated>2015-10-14T15:50:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;184.147.131.85: reviewed hook for Melipona beecheii&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DYKsubpage&lt;br /&gt;
|monthyear=September 2015 &lt;br /&gt;
|passed=&amp;lt;!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2=&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK conditions}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Melipona beecheii====&lt;br /&gt;
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Melipona beecheii|Melipona beecheii}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                   Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ... that '''''[[Melipona beecheii]]''''' were considered by the Mayan Indians to be an endowment of their god [[Ah-Muzen-Cab]] and were the focus of many Mayan religious ceremonies?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Created by [[User:Mebennett49|Mebennett49]] ([[User talk:Mebennett49|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
* {{DYKmake|Melipona beecheii|Mebennett49|subpage=Melipona beecheii}}&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;lt;!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING   :*   --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Article: New – The article was created nine days before the nomination on Sept 30. Between Sept 23 and Sept 30 it was expanded fourfold.&lt;br /&gt;
* Article: Long enough – The article is 16,000 bytes.&lt;br /&gt;
* Article: Within policy – The article is written neutrally. It cites 14 sources, some sentence-by-sentence and some at the end of paragraphs. The sources are all offline, except one; that one is in Spanish, a language I do not read. So we will have to take on faith that there are no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hook: Format – The hook is 147 characters and formatted like the others.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hook: Content - The hook is interesting. It is neutral and does not affect a living person. The hook fact is in the article, but not cited with a citation at the end of the sentence. &lt;br /&gt;
* Other: QPQ – The nominator has no other DYK credits so this is not required.&lt;br /&gt;
* Other: An image was not nominated but a free image is available, as used in the article. See ---&amp;gt; [[Image:Melipona sp Female.jpg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Conclusion: {{Ping|Mebennett49}}, please add a citation to the end of the hook sentence in the article. When that is done, this would be ready to go, assuming the editors here don't mind the slightly longer time period to nomination. By the way, would you consider changing &amp;quot;endowment of&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;gift from&amp;quot; to make the hook read more smoothly? Finally, congratulations on a great article, your hard work shows. [[Special:Contributions/184.147.131.85|184.147.131.85]] ([[User talk:184.147.131.85|talk]]) 15:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>184.147.131.85</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>