Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1804 Haiti Massacre"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Orlady
(not a translation of Swedish Wikipedia; the same person wrote both and uploaded both at essentially the same time)
imported>Nikkimaria
(re)
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
:The article is not a translation from Swedish Wikipedia. The same contributor wrote both articles and uploaded both of them the same day. The Swedish version went up 1 hour and 20 minutes before the English version, but that hardly makes this one a derived translation of the other. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 15:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:The article is not a translation from Swedish Wikipedia. The same contributor wrote both articles and uploaded both of them the same day. The Swedish version went up 1 hour and 20 minutes before the English version, but that hardly makes this one a derived translation of the other. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 15:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 +
::I would argue that based on the first version here, it clearly is a derived translation, but as you will. The other issues are more concerning here. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 16:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:46, 8 December 2011

1804 Haiti Massacre

Created/expanded by Aciram (talk). Nominated by Orlady (talk) at 00:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Article meets all the criteria. New article, meets length requires and is suitably referenced. Hook was eyecatching enough to make me review it, so I figure it's good enough! Miyagawa (talk) 20:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg Multiple sourcing problems here. The article appears to be a translation from Swedish Wikipedia, but is not properly attributed as such. The book sources used lack page numbers, which are required for verification. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Just double checking the article and I'd also missed that there are three paragraphs without citations at the end as well. Miyagawa (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
The article is not a translation from Swedish Wikipedia. The same contributor wrote both articles and uploaded both of them the same day. The Swedish version went up 1 hour and 20 minutes before the English version, but that hardly makes this one a derived translation of the other. --Orlady (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
I would argue that based on the first version here, it clearly is a derived translation, but as you will. The other issues are more concerning here. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)