Difference between revisions of "Template:2017 NFC standings"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Games Back added. This season, and hereafter.)
m (296 revisions imported)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<!-- PLEASE READ THE DOCUMENTATION FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION BEFORE UPDATING THIS TABLE. DO NOT JUST UPDATE YOUR FAVORITE TEAM! -->
 
<!-- PLEASE READ THE DOCUMENTATION FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION BEFORE UPDATING THIS TABLE. DO NOT JUST UPDATE YOUR FAVORITE TEAM! -->
<!-- When referring to teams in tiebreakers, please do not forgot that New York Giants = NY Giants ; Los Angeles Rams = LA Rams. Thanks! Added Games Back column, this season & hereafter.-->
+
<!-- When referring to teams in tiebreakers, please do not forgot that New York Giants = NY Giants ; Los Angeles Rams = LA Rams. Thanks! -->
 
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size: 95%"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size: 95%"
! colspan="13" style="background:#D0E7FF" | {{navbar-header|[[National Football Conference|NFC]]|2017 NFC standings}}
+
! colspan="12" style="background:#D0E7FF" | {{navbar-header|[[National Football Conference|NFC]]|2017 NFC standings}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
!width="30"| #
 
!width="30"| #
Line 16: Line 16:
 
!width="30"| {{Abbr|SOV|Strength of Victory}}
 
!width="30"| {{Abbr|SOV|Strength of Victory}}
 
!width="30"| {{Abbr|STK|Current Winning or Losing Streak}}
 
!width="30"| {{Abbr|STK|Current Winning or Losing Streak}}
!width="30"| {{Abbr|GB|Games Back}}
 
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
| colspan=13 align="center" | '''Division leaders'''
+
| colspan=12 align="center" | '''Division leaders'''
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
| 1{{efn|name=1seed|Philadelphia claimed the No. 1 seed over Minnesota based on winning percentage vs. common opponents. Philadelphia's cumulative record against Carolina, Chicago,<br>LA Rams and Washington was 5–0, compared to Minnesota's 4–1 cumulative record against the same four teams.}}
+
| 1{{efn|name=1seed|Philadelphia claimed the No. 1 seed over Minnesota based on winning percentage vs. common opponents. Philadelphia's cumulative record against Carolina, Chicago, the Los Angeles Rams and Washington was 5–0, compared to Minnesota's 4–1 cumulative record against the same four teams.}}
 
| [[2017 Philadelphia Eagles season|Philadelphia Eagles]]
 
| [[2017 Philadelphia Eagles season|Philadelphia Eagles]]
 
| East
 
| East
Line 32: Line 31:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .433
 
| style="text-align:center" | .433
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | &ndash;
 
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
| 2{{efn|name=1seed}}
 
| 2{{efn|name=1seed}}
Line 46: Line 44:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .447
 
| style="text-align:center" | .447
 
| style="text-align:center" | W3
 
| style="text-align:center" | W3
| style="text-align:center" | &ndash;
 
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
| 3{{efn|name=3–4|LA Rams claimed the No. 3 seed over New Orleans based on head-to-head victory.}}
 
| 3{{efn|name=3–4|LA Rams claimed the No. 3 seed over New Orleans based on head-to-head victory.}}
Line 60: Line 57:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .460
 
| style="text-align:center" | .460
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | 2
 
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
| 4{{efn|name=3–4}}{{efn|name=NFCS|New Orleans clinched the NFC South division over Carolina based on head-to-head sweep.}}
 
| 4{{efn|name=3–4}}{{efn|name=NFCS|New Orleans clinched the NFC South division over Carolina based on head-to-head sweep.}}
Line 74: Line 70:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .483
 
| style="text-align:center" | .483
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | 2
 
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
| colspan=13 align="center" | '''Wild Cards'''
+
| colspan=12 align="center" | '''Wild Cards'''
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
| 5{{efn|name=NFCS}}
 
| 5{{efn|name=NFCS}}
Line 90: Line 85:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .500
 
| style="text-align:center" | .500
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | 2
 
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
|-style="background-color:#ccffcc"
 
| 6
 
| 6
Line 104: Line 98:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .475
 
| style="text-align:center" | .475
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
| style="text-align:center" | 3
 
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
| colspan=13 align="center"| '''Did not qualify for the playoffs'''
+
| colspan=12 align="center"| '''Did not qualify for the playoffs'''
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|DET|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|DET|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 7{{efn|name=7–9|Detroit finished ahead of Dallas and Seattle based on conference record, while Seattle finished ahead of Dallas based on head-to-head victory.}}
 
| 7{{efn|name=7–9|Detroit finished ahead of Dallas and Seattle based on conference record, while Seattle finished ahead of Dallas based on head-to-head victory.}}
Line 120: Line 113:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .368
 
| style="text-align:center" | .368
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
| style="text-align:center" | 4
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|SEA|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|SEA|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 8{{efn|name=7–9}}
 
| 8{{efn|name=7–9}}
Line 134: Line 126:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .444
 
| style="text-align:center" | .444
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | 4
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|DAL|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|DAL|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 9{{efn|name=7–9}}
 
| 9{{efn|name=7–9}}
Line 148: Line 139:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .438
 
| style="text-align:center" | .438
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
| style="text-align:center" | 4
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|ARI|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|ARI|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 10
 
| 10
Line 162: Line 152:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .406
 
| style="text-align:center" | .406
 
| style="text-align:center" | W2
 
| style="text-align:center" | W2
| style="text-align:center" | 5
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|GB|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|GB|style="background:#ffc"}}
| 11{{efn|name=11–12|Green Bay finished ahead of Washington based on record vs. common opponents. Green Bay's cumulative record against Dallas, Minnesota, New Orleans and Seattle<br>was 2–3, compared to Washington's 1–4 cumulative record against the same four teams.}}
+
| 11{{efn|name=11–12|Green Bay finished ahead of Washington based on record vs. common opponents. Green Bay's cumulative record against Dallas, Minnesota, New Orleans and Seattle was 2–3, compared to Washington's 1–4 cumulative record against the same four teams.}}
 
| [[2017 Green Bay Packers season|Green Bay Packers]]
 
| [[2017 Green Bay Packers season|Green Bay Packers]]
 
| North
 
| North
Line 176: Line 165:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .357
 
| style="text-align:center" | .357
 
| style="text-align:center" | L3
 
| style="text-align:center" | L3
| style="text-align:center" | 6
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|WAS|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|WAS|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 12{{efn|name=11–12}}
 
| 12{{efn|name=11–12}}
Line 190: Line 178:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .429
 
| style="text-align:center" | .429
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | 6
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|SF|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|SF|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 13
 
| 13
Line 204: Line 191:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .438
 
| style="text-align:center" | .438
 
| style="text-align:center" | W5
 
| style="text-align:center" | W5
| style="text-align:center" | 7
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|TB|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|TB|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 14{{efn|name=14–15|Tampa Bay finished ahead of Chicago based on head-to-head victory.}}
 
| 14{{efn|name=14–15|Tampa Bay finished ahead of Chicago based on head-to-head victory.}}
Line 218: Line 204:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .375
 
| style="text-align:center" | .375
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
| style="text-align:center" | 8
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|CHI|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|CHI|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 15{{efn|name=14–15}}
 
| 15{{efn|name=14–15}}
Line 232: Line 217:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .500
 
| style="text-align:center" | .500
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
 
| style="text-align:center" | L1
| style="text-align:center" | 8
 
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|NYG|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
|-{{#ifeq:{{{team|}}}|NYG|style="background:#ffc"}}
 
| 16
 
| 16
Line 246: Line 230:
 
| style="text-align:center" | .458
 
| style="text-align:center" | .458
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
 
| style="text-align:center" | W1
| style="text-align:center" | 10
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
 
| colspan=13 style="text-align:center" | '''[[National_Football_League_playoffs#Breaking_ties|Tiebreakers]]'''{{efn|When breaking ties for three or more teams under the NFL's rules, they are first broken within divisions, then comparing only the highest ranked remaining team from each division.}}
 
|-
 
| colspan=13 | {{notelist}}
 
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
 
|- style="background-color:#cccccc"
| colspan=13 | '''Legend'''
+
| colspan=12 style="text-align:center" | '''[[National_Football_League_playoffs#Breaking_ties|Tiebreakers]]'''{{efn|When breaking ties for three or more teams under the NFL's rules, they are first broken within divisions, then comparing only the highest ranked remaining team from each division.}}
|-
 
| align=left colspan=13 | '''w''' — Clinched wild card
 
|-
 
| align=left colspan=13 | '''x''' — Clinched playoff berth
 
|-
 
| align=left colspan=13 | '''y''' — Clinched division
 
|-
 
| align=left colspan=13 | '''z''' — Clinched first-round bye
 
 
|-
 
|-
| align=left colspan=13 | '''*''' — Clinched home-field advantage
+
| colspan=12 | {{notelist}}
 
|}<noinclude>
 
|}<noinclude>
 
{{Template reference list}}
 
{{Template reference list}}

Latest revision as of 13:12, 9 October 2020

# Team Division W L T PCT DIV CONF SOS SOV STK
Division leaders
1[lower-alpha 1] Philadelphia Eagles East 13 3 0 Template:Winpct 5–1 10–2 .461 .433 L1
2[lower-alpha 1] Minnesota Vikings North 13 3 0 Template:Winpct 5–1 10–2 .492 .447 W3
3[lower-alpha 2] Los Angeles Rams West 11 5 0 Template:Winpct 4–2 7–5 .504 .460 L1
4[lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] New Orleans Saints South 11 5 0 Template:Winpct 4–2 8–4 .535 .483 L1
Wild Cards
5[lower-alpha 3] Carolina Panthers South 11 5 0 Template:Winpct 3–3 7–5 .539 .500 L1
6 Atlanta Falcons South 10 6 0 Template:Winpct 4–2 9–3 .543 .475 W1
Did not qualify for the playoffs
7[lower-alpha 4] Detroit Lions North 9 7 0 Template:Winpct 5–1 8–4 .496 .368 W1
8[lower-alpha 4] Seattle Seahawks West 9 7 0 Template:Winpct 4–2 7–5 .492 .444 L1
9[lower-alpha 4] Dallas Cowboys East 9 7 0 Template:Winpct 5–1 7–5 .496 .438 W1
10 Arizona Cardinals West 8 8 0 Template:Winpct 3–3 5–7 .488 .406 W2
11[lower-alpha 5] Green Bay Packers North 7 9 0 Template:Winpct 2–4 5–7 .539 .357 L3
12[lower-alpha 5] Washington Redskins East 7 9 0 Template:Winpct 1–5 5–7 .539 .429 L1
13 San Francisco 49ers West 6 10 0 Template:Winpct 1–5 3–9 .512 .438 W5
14[lower-alpha 6] Tampa Bay Buccaneers South 5 11 0 Template:Winpct 1–5 3–9 .555 .375 W1
15[lower-alpha 6] Chicago Bears North 5 11 0 Template:Winpct 0–6 1–11 .559 .500 L1
16 New York Giants East 3 13 0 Template:Winpct 1–5 1–11 .531 .458 W1
Tiebreakers[lower-alpha 7]
  1. 1.0 1.1 Philadelphia claimed the No. 1 seed over Minnesota based on winning percentage vs. common opponents. Philadelphia's cumulative record against Carolina, Chicago, the Los Angeles Rams and Washington was 5–0, compared to Minnesota's 4–1 cumulative record against the same four teams.
  2. 2.0 2.1 LA Rams claimed the No. 3 seed over New Orleans based on head-to-head victory.
  3. 3.0 3.1 New Orleans clinched the NFC South division over Carolina based on head-to-head sweep.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Detroit finished ahead of Dallas and Seattle based on conference record, while Seattle finished ahead of Dallas based on head-to-head victory.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Green Bay finished ahead of Washington based on record vs. common opponents. Green Bay's cumulative record against Dallas, Minnesota, New Orleans and Seattle was 2–3, compared to Washington's 1–4 cumulative record against the same four teams.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Tampa Bay finished ahead of Chicago based on head-to-head victory.
  7. When breaking ties for three or more teams under the NFL's rules, they are first broken within divisions, then comparing only the highest ranked remaining team from each division.

References

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Please read before updating

Please make sure to update:

  1. Both teams: If the match was not interconference, update the record of both teams (not just the winner or the team you support).
  2. Every column: Update every column (not just W-L-T-PCT). Pay close attention to SOS, SOV, and STK (errors will be hard to detect).
  3. Correct positions: Make sure the teams are in the correct positions. In particular, make sure teams with the same record are ranked correctly based on the tiebreakers of the NFL.
    • The tiebreakers are listed here.

Usage

This is a template that was created to easily update every article with the 2016 NFC standings.

The teams should be sorted according to the NFL tiebreaking rules, as indicated by such reliable sources as ESPN's playoff standings (the conference standings page on NFL.com are usually not accurate on this issue because they normally do not sort them by ALL the tiebreaking rules until the end of the season).

Because of the complexities of the tiebreaking rules, anything that is not verifiable may be reverted on grounds of original research. The footnotes listing the tiebreakers are currently displayed using the "lower-alpha" predefined footnote group (see WP:EXPLNOTE).

To use the update on any article, insert:

{{2017 NFC standings}}

To highlight the Seattle Seahawks, insert:

{{2017 NFC standings|team=SEA}}

The following are the codes for the teams in the NFC:

  • ARI - Arizona Cardinals
  • ATL - Atlanta Falcons
  • CAR - Carolina Panthers
  • CHI - Chicago Bears
  • DAL - Dallas Cowboys
  • DET - Detroit Lions
  • GB - Green Bay Packers
  • LAR - Los Angeles Rams
  • MIN - Minnesota Vikings
  • NO - New Orleans Saints
  • NYG - New York Giants
  • PHI - Philadelphia Eagles
  • SF - San Francisco 49ers
  • SEA - Seattle Seahawks
  • TB - Tampa Bay Buccaneers
  • WAS - Washington Redskins

See also