Difference between revisions of "Template:AMD Radeon Rx 200"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
blackwiki>C Wiz |
m (87 revisions imported) |
||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Changes to the table *layout* should be proposed and discussed first on Talk:List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units --> | <!-- Changes to the table *layout* should be proposed and discussed first on Talk:List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units --> | ||
| − | {|class="wikitable" style="font-size: 85%; | + | {| class="wikitable center" style="font-size: 85%;" |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | Model<br />([[ | + | |- |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | | + | ! rowspan=2 | Model<br />([[codename]]) |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br /> | + | ! rowspan=2 | Release Date<br />& Price |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size | + | ! rowspan=2 |[[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />& [[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]] |
| + | ! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />& Die Size | ||
! colspan=2 | Core | ! colspan=2 | Core | ||
| − | ! colspan=2 | [[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="texture fill"}}{{efn|name="pixel fill"}} | + | ! colspan=2 |[[Fillrate]]{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="texture fill"}}{{efn|name="pixel fill"}} |
! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]]) | ! colspan=2 | Processing power{{efn|name="boost"}}{{efn|name="FLOPS"}}<br />([[GFLOPS]]) | ||
! colspan=4 | Memory | ! colspan=4 | Memory | ||
| − | ! rowspan=2 | TBP | + | ! rowspan=2 |{{abbr|TBP|Typical board power}} |
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}} | ! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}} | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R5 220<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/oem/r5#2|title=Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} OEM {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-03-13}}</ref><br />(Caicos Pro) |
| − | + | | {{dts|2013|12|21|format=mdy}}<br />OEM | |
| − | + | | rowspan=4 |[[TeraScale 2|Terascale 2]]<br />40 nm | |
| − | + | | rowspan=4 |{{val|370|e=6}}<br />67 mm<sup>2</sup> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | | {{ | ||
| − | | rowspan=4 | {{val|370|e=6}}<br />67 mm<sup>2</sup> | ||
| 80:8:4 | | 80:8:4 | ||
| 625<br />''650'' | | 625<br />''650'' | ||
| + | | 5 | ||
| 2.5 | | 2.5 | ||
| − | |||
| 200 | | 200 | ||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| Line 55: | Line 38: | ||
| 1066 | | 1066 | ||
| 8.53 | | 8.53 | ||
| − | | 18 | + | | 18 W |
| − | | | + | | rowspan="4" | PCIe 2.1 ×16 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 230<ref name="amd-r5#2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r5#2|title=Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-19}}</ref><br />(Caicos Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R5 230<ref name="amd-r5#2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r5#2|title=Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-19}}</ref><br />(Caicos Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2014|04|03|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/199511/amd-launches-radeon-r5-230-in-the-retail-channel-gigabyte-outs-its-offering.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering |author=btarunr |date=3 April 2014 |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref> | + | | {{dts|2014|04|03|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/199511/amd-launches-radeon-r5-230-in-the-retail-channel-gigabyte-outs-its-offering.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering |author=btarunr |date=3 April 2014 |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref><br />? |
| 160:8:4 | | 160:8:4 | ||
| 625 | | 625 | ||
| + | | 5 | ||
| 2.5 | | 2.5 | ||
| − | |||
| 200 | | 200 | ||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| Line 70: | Line 53: | ||
| 1066 | | 1066 | ||
| 8.53 | | 8.53 | ||
| − | | 19<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2014/2014040401_AMD_Launches_Radeon_R5_230_For_Retail_Market.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market |last=Wiles |first=Debbie |date=4 April 2014 |publisher=CPU-World.com |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref> | + | | 19 W<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2014/2014040401_AMD_Launches_Radeon_R5_230_For_Retail_Market.html |title=AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market |last=Wiles |first=Debbie |date=4 April 2014 |publisher=CPU-World.com |accessdate=14 April 2014}}</ref> |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 235<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Caicos XT) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R5 235<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Caicos XT) |
| − | | {{ | + | | {{dts|2013|12|21|format=mdy}}<br />OEM |
| 160:8:4 | | 160:8:4 | ||
| 775 | | 775 | ||
| + | | 6.2 | ||
| 3.1 | | 3.1 | ||
| − | |||
| 248 | | 248 | ||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| Line 85: | Line 67: | ||
| 1800 | | 1800 | ||
| 14.4 | | 14.4 | ||
| − | | 35<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2502/radeon-r5-235-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=10 July 2015}}</ref> | + | | 35 W<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2502/radeon-r5-235-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=10 July 2015}}</ref> |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 235X<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Caicos XT) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R5 235X<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Caicos XT) |
| − | | {{ | + | | {{dts|2013|12|21|format=mdy}}<br />OEM |
| 160:8:4 | | 160:8:4 | ||
| 875 | | 875 | ||
| + | | 7.0 | ||
| 3.5 | | 3.5 | ||
| − | |||
| 280 | | 280 | ||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| Line 100: | Line 81: | ||
| 1800 | | 1800 | ||
| 14.4 | | 14.4 | ||
| − | | 18 | + | | 18 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R5 240<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series"/><br />(Oland) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R5 240<ref name="AMD R5 200 Series" /><br />(Oland) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|11|01|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2531/radeon-r5-240-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=30 January 2016}}</ref> | + | | {{dts|2013|11|01|format=mdy}}<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2531/radeon-r5-240-oem.html |title=AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=30 January 2016}}</ref><br />OEM |
| − | | rowspan=5 | + | | rowspan=5 |[[GCN 1.0|GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen]]<br />28 nm |
| − | | rowspan=3 | + | | rowspan=3 |{{val|1040|e=6}}<br />90 mm<sup>2</sup> |
| − | | | + | | 384:24:8 |
| 730<br />''780'' | | 730<br />''780'' | ||
| + | | 14.6 | ||
| 5.84 | | 5.84 | ||
| − | | | + | | 560.6<br />''599'' |
| − | |||
| 29.2 | | 29.2 | ||
| − | | DDR3<br /> | + | | DDR3<br />GDDR3<br />64-bit |
| 1024<br />2048 | | 1024<br />2048 | ||
| − | | 1800<br /> | + | | 1800<br />2000 |
| − | | 28.8<br /> | + | | 28.8<br />16.0 |
| − | | | + | | 30 W |
| − | | rowspan=3 | + | | rowspan=3 | PCIe 3.0 ×8 |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 240<ref name="amd-r7#2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r7#2|title=Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-19}}</ref><br />(Oland Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 240<ref name="amd-r7#2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r7#2|title=Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-19}}</ref><br />(Oland Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}<br />US $69 |
| 320:20:8 | | 320:20:8 | ||
| 730<br />''780'' | | 730<br />''780'' | ||
| + | | 14.6 | ||
| 5.84 | | 5.84 | ||
| − | |||
| 467.2<br />''499.2'' | | 467.2<br />''499.2'' | ||
| 29.2 | | 29.2 | ||
| DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128-bit | | DDR3<br />GDDR5<br />128-bit | ||
| − | | 2048 | + | | 2048<br />4096 |
| 1800<br />4500 | | 1800<br />4500 | ||
| 28.8<br />72 | | 28.8<br />72 | ||
| − | | 30 | + | | 30 W, <45 W (4 GB)<ref>[http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=A95D090F-34D3-4BD8-ADA2-DA5F80F7B15F&lang=eng ]{{dead link|date=April 2019}}</ref> |
| − | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 250<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Oland XT) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 250<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Oland XT) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}<br />US $89 |
| 384:24:8 | | 384:24:8 | ||
| 1000<br />(1050) | | 1000<br />(1050) | ||
| + | | 24 | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| − | |||
| 768<br />806.4 | | 768<br />806.4 | ||
| 48 | | 48 | ||
| Line 148: | Line 126: | ||
| 1800<br />4600 | | 1800<br />4600 | ||
| 73.6 | | 73.6 | ||
| − | | 75 | + | | 75 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 250E<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2559/radeon-r7-250e.html |title=AMD Radeon R7 250E |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=5 January 2016}}</ref><br />(Cape Verde Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 250E<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2559/radeon-r7-250e.html |title=AMD Radeon R7 250E |publisher=TechPowerUp |accessdate=5 January 2016}}</ref><br />(Cape Verde Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|12|21|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|12|21|format=mdy}}<br />US $109 |
| − | | rowspan=2 | + | | rowspan="2" |{{val|1500|e=6}}<br />123 mm<sup>2</sup> |
| 512:32:16 | | 512:32:16 | ||
| 800 | | 800 | ||
| + | | 25.6 | ||
| 12.8 | | 12.8 | ||
| − | |||
| 819.2 | | 819.2 | ||
| 51.2 | | 51.2 | ||
| Line 164: | Line 141: | ||
| 4500 | | 4500 | ||
| 72 | | 72 | ||
| − | | 55 | + | | 55 W |
| − | | rowspan= | + | | rowspan=14 | PCIe 3.0 ×16 |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 250X<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Cape Verde XT) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 250X<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Cape Verde XT) |
| − | | {{dts|2014|02|10|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2014|02|10|format=mdy}}<br />US $99 |
| 640:40:16 | | 640:40:16 | ||
| 1000 | | 1000 | ||
| + | | 40 | ||
| 16 | | 16 | ||
| − | |||
| 1280 | | 1280 | ||
| 80 | | 80 | ||
| Line 180: | Line 156: | ||
| 4500 | | 4500 | ||
| 72 | | 72 | ||
| − | | 95 | + | | 95 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 260<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Bonaire) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 260<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Bonaire) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|12|17|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|12|17|format=mdy}}<br />US $109 |
| − | | rowspan=2 | [[ | + | | rowspan="2" |[[GCN 1.1|GCN 2<sup>nd</sup> gen]]<br />28 nm |
| − | | rowspan=2 | {{val|2080|e=6}}<br />160 mm<sup>2</sup> | + | | rowspan="2" |{{val|2080|e=6}}<br />160 mm<sup>2</sup> |
| 768:48:16 | | 768:48:16 | ||
| 1000 | | 1000 | ||
| + | | 48 | ||
| 16 | | 16 | ||
| − | |||
| 1536 | | 1536 | ||
| 96 | | 96 | ||
| Line 197: | Line 172: | ||
| 6000 | | 6000 | ||
| 96 | | 96 | ||
| − | | 95 | + | | 95 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 260X<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Bonaire XTX) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 260X<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Bonaire XTX) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}<br />US $139 |
| 896:56:16 | | 896:56:16 | ||
| 1100 | | 1100 | ||
| + | | 61.6 | ||
| 17.6 | | 17.6 | ||
| − | |||
| 1971.2 | | 1971.2 | ||
| 123.2 | | 123.2 | ||
| Line 212: | Line 186: | ||
| 6500 | | 6500 | ||
| 104 | | 104 | ||
| − | | 115 | + | | 115 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R7 265<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Pitcairn Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R7 265<ref name="amd-r7#2" /><br />(Pitcairn Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2014|02|13|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2014|02|13|format=mdy}}<br />US $149 |
| − | | rowspan=5 | [[ | + | | rowspan=5 | [[GCN 1.0|GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen]]<br />28 nm |
| rowspan=3 | {{val|2800|e=6}}<br />212 mm<sup>2</sup> | | rowspan=3 | {{val|2800|e=6}}<br />212 mm<sup>2</sup> | ||
| 1024:64:32 | | 1024:64:32 | ||
| 900<br />''925'' | | 900<br />''925'' | ||
| + | | 57.6 | ||
| 28.8 | | 28.8 | ||
| − | |||
| 1843.2 | | 1843.2 | ||
| 115.2 | | 115.2 | ||
| Line 229: | Line 202: | ||
| 5600 | | 5600 | ||
| 179.2 | | 179.2 | ||
| − | | 150 | + | | 150 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 270<ref name="amd-r9#2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r9#2|title=Radeon™ R9 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-19}}</ref><br />(Pitcairn XT) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 270<ref name="amd-r9#2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/r9#2|title=Radeon™ R9 Series Graphics Cards {{!}} AMD|website=www.amd.com|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-19}}</ref><br />(Pitcairn XT) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|11|13|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|11|13|format=mdy}}<br />US $179 |
| 1280:80:32 | | 1280:80:32 | ||
| 900<br />''925'' | | 900<br />''925'' | ||
| + | | 72 | ||
| 28.8 | | 28.8 | ||
| − | |||
| 2304<br />''2368'' | | 2304<br />''2368'' | ||
| 144<br />''148'' | | 144<br />''148'' | ||
| Line 244: | Line 216: | ||
| 5600 | | 5600 | ||
| 179.2 | | 179.2 | ||
| − | | 150 | + | | 150 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 270X | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 270X<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><br />(Pitcairn XT) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}<br />US $199 |
| 1280:80:32 | | 1280:80:32 | ||
| 1000<br />''1050'' | | 1000<br />''1050'' | ||
| + | | 80 | ||
| 32 | | 32 | ||
| − | |||
| 2560<br />''2688'' | | 2560<br />''2688'' | ||
| 160<br />''168'' | | 160<br />''168'' | ||
| Line 259: | Line 230: | ||
| 5600 | | 5600 | ||
| 179.2 | | 179.2 | ||
| − | | 180 | + | | 180 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 280<ref name="amd-r9#2"/><br />(Tahiti Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 280<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><br />(Tahiti Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2014|03|04|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2014|03|04|format=mdy}}<br />US $249 |
| − | | rowspan=2 | {{val|4313|e=6}}<br />352 mm<sup>2</sup> | + | | rowspan=2 |{{val|4313|e=6}}<br />352 mm<sup>2</sup> |
| 1792:112:32 | | 1792:112:32 | ||
| 827<br />''933'' | | 827<br />''933'' | ||
| + | | 92.6 | ||
| 26.5 | | 26.5 | ||
| − | |||
| 2964<br />''3343.9'' | | 2964<br />''3343.9'' | ||
| 741<br />''836'' | | 741<br />''836'' | ||
| Line 275: | Line 245: | ||
| 5000 | | 5000 | ||
| 240 | | 240 | ||
| − | | 250 | + | | 250 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 280X<ref name="amd-r9#2"/><br />(Tahiti XTL)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/amd-preparing-tahiti-xtl-revision-radeon-r9-280x-graphic-card/ |title=AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release |last=Mujtaba |first=Hassan |date=26 October 2013 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=27 October 2013}}</ref> | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 280X<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><br />(Tahiti XTL)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/amd-preparing-tahiti-xtl-revision-radeon-r9-280x-graphic-card/ |title=AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release |last=Mujtaba |first=Hassan |date=26 October 2013 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=27 October 2013}}</ref> |
| − | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|08|08|format=mdy}}<br />US $299 |
| 2048:128:32 | | 2048:128:32 | ||
| 850<br />''1000'' | | 850<br />''1000'' | ||
| + | | 109–128 | ||
| 27.2–32 | | 27.2–32 | ||
| − | |||
| 3481.6<br />4096 | | 3481.6<br />4096 | ||
| 870.4<br />1024 | | 870.4<br />1024 | ||
| Line 290: | Line 259: | ||
| 6000 | | 6000 | ||
| 288 | | 288 | ||
| − | | 250 | + | | 250 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | {{anchor|Radeon-R9-285}}Radeon<br />R9 285<ref name="amd-r9#2"/><br />(Tonga Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" |{{anchor|Radeon-R9-285}}Radeon<br />R9 285<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><br />(Tonga Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2014|09|02|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2014|09|02|format=mdy}}<br />US $249 |
| − | | [[ | + | | rowspan=2 | [[GCN 1.2|GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen]]<br />28 nm |
| − | | {{val|5000|e=6}}<br />359 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="Hexus R9 285" /> | + | | rowspan=2 | {{val|5000|e=6}}<br />359 mm<sup>2</sup> <ref name="Hexus R9 285" /> |
| 1792:112:32 | | 1792:112:32 | ||
| 918 | | 918 | ||
| + | | 102.8 | ||
| 29.4 | | 29.4 | ||
| − | |||
| 3290 | | 3290 | ||
| 206.6<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |page=17 |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref> | | 206.6<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/8460/amd-radeon-r9-285-review/17 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=10 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |page=17 |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref> | ||
| Line 307: | Line 275: | ||
| 5500 | | 5500 | ||
| 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}} | | 176{{efn|The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1<sup>st</sup> gen and 2<sup>nd</sup> gen cards) in certain situations.<ref name="Hexus R9 285">{{cite web |url=http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/74033-sapphire-radeon-r9-285-dual-x-oc-28nm-tonga/ |title=Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga) |last=Sandhu |first=Tarinder |date=2 September 2014 |publisher=[[Hexus]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/189034-amd-radeon-r9-285-review-the-gcn-1-2-torpedo-that-takes-out-nvidias-gtx-760 |title=AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3<sup>rd</sup> gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia’s GTX 760 |first=Joel |last=Hruska |date=2 September 2014 |work=[[ExtremeTech]] |publisher=[[Ziff Davis]] |accessdate=11 September 2014}}</ref>}} | ||
| − | | 190 | + | | 190 W |
| − | | | + | |- |
| + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" |{{anchor|Radeon-R9-285X}}Radeon<br />R9 285X<br />(Tonga XT) | ||
| + | | Unreleased <ref>{{cite web |url=https://videocardz.com/64156/amd-radeon-r9-285x-spotted |title=AMD Radeon R9 285X spotted |accessdate=10 January 2019}}</ref> | ||
| + | | 2048:128:32 | ||
| + | | 1002 | ||
| + | | 128.3 | ||
| + | | 32.1 | ||
| + | | 4104 | ||
| + | | 256.5 | ||
| + | | GDDR5<br />384-bit | ||
| + | | 3072 | ||
| + | | 5500 | ||
| + | | 264 | ||
| + | | 300 W | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 290<ref name="amd-r9#2"/><br />(Hawaii Pro) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 290<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><br />(Hawaii Pro) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|11|05|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2013|11|05|format=mdy}}<br />US $399 |
| − | | rowspan=3 | [[ | + | | rowspan=3 | [[GCN 1.1|GCN 2<sup>nd</sup> gen]]<br />28 nm |
| − | | rowspan=2 | {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />438 mm<sup>2</sup><ref name="AnandTech R9 290X">{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/ |title=The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=24 October 2013 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref> | + | | rowspan=2 | {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />438 mm<sup>2</sup> <ref name="AnandTech R9 290X">{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/ |title=The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=24 October 2013 |work=AnandTech |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=24 October 2013}}</ref> |
| 2560:160:64 | | 2560:160:64 | ||
| up to 947{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"|Base clock of '''R9 290''' and '''R9 290X''' will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290-review-benchmark,3659.html |title=AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent? |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=5 November 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>}} | | up to 947{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"|Base clock of '''R9 290''' and '''R9 290X''' will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290-review-benchmark,3659.html |title=AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent? |last=Angelini |first=Chris |date=5 November 2013 |work=[[Tom's Hardware]] |publisher=[[Purch Group]] |accessdate=6 November 2013}}</ref>}} | ||
| + | | 151.52 | ||
| 60.608 | | 60.608 | ||
| − | |||
| 4848.6 | | 4848.6 | ||
| 606.1 | | 606.1 | ||
| Line 324: | Line 305: | ||
| 5000 | | 5000 | ||
| 320 | | 320 | ||
| − | | 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP">{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/fast-amd-radeon-r9-nano-find/ |title=AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X |last=Moammer |first=Khalid |date=21 June 2015 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=25 July 2015}}</ref> | + | | 250 W<ref name="R9 290 TDP">{{cite web |url=http://wccftech.com/fast-amd-radeon-r9-nano-find/ |title=AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X |last=Moammer |first=Khalid |date=21 June 2015 |publisher=WCCFtech.com |accessdate=25 July 2015}}</ref> |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 290X<ref name="amd-r9#2"/><br />(Hawaii XT) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 290X<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><br />(Hawaii XT) |
| − | | {{dts|2013|10|24|format=mdy}}<br />{{dts|2014|11|6|format=mdy}}<ref name="R9 290X 8GB release">{{cite web |url=https://www.bit-tech.net/news/tech/graphics/amd-r9-290x-8gb/1/ |title=AMD board partners launch R9 290X 8GB models |last=Gareth |first=Halfacree |date=6 November 2014 |publisher=bit-tech.net |accessdate=15 June 2018}}</ref> | + | | {{dts|2013|10|24|format=mdy}}<br />{{dts|2014|11|6|format=mdy}}<ref name="R9 290X 8GB release">{{cite web |url=https://www.bit-tech.net/news/tech/graphics/amd-r9-290x-8gb/1/ |title=AMD board partners launch R9 290X 8GB models |last=Gareth |first=Halfacree |date=6 November 2014 |publisher=bit-tech.net |accessdate=15 June 2018}}</ref><br />US $549 |
| 2816:176:64 | | 2816:176:64 | ||
| 1000{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"}} | | 1000{{efn|name="290/290X base clock"}} | ||
| + | | 176 | ||
| 64 | | 64 | ||
| − | |||
| 5632 | | 5632 | ||
| 704 | | 704 | ||
| Line 339: | Line 319: | ||
| 5000 | | 5000 | ||
| 320 | | 320 | ||
| − | | 250<ref name="R9 290 TDP" /> | + | | 250 W<ref name="R9 290 TDP" /> |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! {{rh}} | Radeon<br />R9 295X2<ref name="amd-r9#2"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/anton-shilov/amd-radeon-r9-295-x2-final-specs-revealed-card-may-not-fit-all-pc-cases/ |title=AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs |last=Shilov |first=Anton |date=4 April 2014 |work=KitGuru |publisher=Korona Solutions |accessdate=6 April 2014}}</ref><br />(Vesuvius) | + | ! {{rh}} class="table-rh" | Radeon<br />R9 295X2<ref name="amd-r9#2" /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/anton-shilov/amd-radeon-r9-295-x2-final-specs-revealed-card-may-not-fit-all-pc-cases/ |title=AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs |last=Shilov |first=Anton |date=4 April 2014 |work=KitGuru |publisher=Korona Solutions |accessdate=6 April 2014}}</ref><br />(Vesuvius) |
| − | | {{dts|2014|04|08|format=mdy}} | + | | {{dts|2014|04|08|format=mdy}}<br />US $1499 |
| 2× {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />2× 438 mm<sup>2</sup> | | 2× {{val|6200|e=6}}<br />2× 438 mm<sup>2</sup> | ||
| 2× 2816:176:64 | | 2× 2816:176:64 | ||
| 1018 | | 1018 | ||
| − | | | + | | 358.33 |
| − | | | + | | 130.3 |
| − | | | + | | 11466.75 |
| − | | | + | | 1433.34 |
| GDDR5<br />512-bit | | GDDR5<br />512-bit | ||
| 2× 4096 | | 2× 4096 | ||
| 5000 | | 5000 | ||
| 2× 320 | | 2× 320 | ||
| − | | 500 | + | | 500 W |
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! rowspan=2 | Model<br />([[ | + | ! rowspan=2 | Model<br />([[codename]]) |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | | + | ! rowspan=2 | Release Date<br />& Price |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br /> | + | ! rowspan=2 | [[Microarchitecture|Architecture]]<br />& [[Semiconductor device fabrication|Fab]] |
| − | ! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />Die Size | + | ! rowspan=2 | Transistors<br />& Die Size |
! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}} | ! Config{{efn|name="cconfig"}} | ||
! Clock{{efn|name="boost"}} ([[Hertz|MHz]]) | ! Clock{{efn|name="boost"}} ([[Hertz|MHz]]) | ||
| + | ! Texture ([[Texel (graphics)|GT]]/s) | ||
! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s) | ! Pixel ([[Pixel|GP]]/s) | ||
| − | |||
! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]] | ! [[Single precision floating-point format|Single]] | ||
! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]] | ! [[Double precision floating-point format|Double]] | ||
| − | ! Bus type | + | ! Bus type<br />& width |
! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]]) | ! Size ([[Mebibyte|MiB]]) | ||
! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]]) | ! Clock ([[Transfer (computing)|MT/s]]) | ||
! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ! Band-<br />width ([[Gigabyte|GB]]/s) | ||
| − | ! rowspan=2 | TBP | + | ! rowspan=2 | {{abbr|TBP|Typical board power}} |
! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ! rowspan=2 | Bus interface | ||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=2 | Core | ! colspan=2 | Core | ||
| Line 381: | Line 358: | ||
! colspan=4 | Memory | ! colspan=4 | Memory | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | {{navbar|AMD Radeon Rx 200|mini=y|plain=y|style=float: right;position: relative;top: -15px;right: 5px;}} | |
{{notelist|refs= | {{notelist|refs= | ||
{{efn|name="boost"|Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in ''italic''.}} | {{efn|name="boost"|Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in ''italic''.}} | ||
| Line 387: | Line 364: | ||
{{efn|name="texture fill"|Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Texture Mapping Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}} | {{efn|name="texture fill"|Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Texture Mapping Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}} | ||
{{efn|name="pixel fill"|Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Render Output Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}} | {{efn|name="pixel fill"|Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of '''Render Output Units''' multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.}} | ||
| − | {{efn|name="FLOPS"|Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a [[ | + | {{efn|name="FLOPS"|Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a [[Fused multiply–add|FMA]] operation.}} |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:50, 16 October 2020
| Model (codename) |
Release Date & Price |
Architecture & Fab |
Transistors & Die Size |
Core | Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] | Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4] (GFLOPS) |
Memory | TBP | Bus interface | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Config[lower-alpha 5] | Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) | Texture (GT/s) | Pixel (GP/s) | Single | Double | Bus type & width |
Size (MiB) | Clock (MT/s) | Band- width (GB/s) | ||||||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R5 220[1] (Caicos Pro) |
December 21, 2013 OEM |
Terascale 2 40 nm |
Template:Val 67 mm2 |
80:8:4 | 625 650 |
5 | 2.5 | 200 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64-bit |
1024 | 1066 | 8.53 | 18 W | PCIe 2.1 ×16 |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R5 230[2] (Caicos Pro) |
April 3, 2014[3] ? |
160:8:4 | 625 | 5 | 2.5 | 200 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64-bit |
1024 2048 |
1066 | 8.53 | 19 W[4] | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R5 235[1] (Caicos XT) |
December 21, 2013 OEM |
160:8:4 | 775 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 248 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64-bit |
1024 | 1800 | 14.4 | 35 W[5] | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R5 235X[1] (Caicos XT) |
December 21, 2013 OEM |
160:8:4 | 875 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 280 | Template:N/A | DDR3 64-bit |
1024 | 1800 | 14.4 | 18 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R5 240[1] (Oland) |
November 1, 2013[6] OEM |
GCN 1st gen 28 nm |
Template:Val 90 mm2 |
384:24:8 | 730 780 |
14.6 | 5.84 | 560.6 599 |
29.2 | DDR3 GDDR3 64-bit |
1024 2048 |
1800 2000 |
28.8 16.0 |
30 W | PCIe 3.0 ×8 |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 240[7] (Oland Pro) |
August 8, 2013 US $69 |
320:20:8 | 730 780 |
14.6 | 5.84 | 467.2 499.2 |
29.2 | DDR3 GDDR5 128-bit |
2048 4096 |
1800 4500 |
28.8 72 |
30 W, <45 W (4 GB)[8] | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 250[7] (Oland XT) |
August 8, 2013 US $89 |
384:24:8 | 1000 (1050) |
24 | 8 | 768 806.4 |
48 | DDR3 GDDR5 128-bit |
1024 2048 |
1800 4600 |
73.6 | 75 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 250E[9] (Cape Verde Pro) |
December 21, 2013 US $109 |
Template:Val 123 mm2 |
512:32:16 | 800 | 25.6 | 12.8 | 819.2 | 51.2 | GDDR5 128-bit |
1024 2048 |
4500 | 72 | 55 W | PCIe 3.0 ×16 | |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 250X[7] (Cape Verde XT) |
February 10, 2014 US $99 |
640:40:16 | 1000 | 40 | 16 | 1280 | 80 | GDDR5 128-bit |
1024 2048 |
4500 | 72 | 95 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 260[7] (Bonaire) |
December 17, 2013 US $109 |
GCN 2nd gen 28 nm |
Template:Val 160 mm2 |
768:48:16 | 1000 | 48 | 16 | 1536 | 96 | GDDR5 128-bit |
1024 | 6000 | 96 | 95 W | |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 260X[7] (Bonaire XTX) |
August 8, 2013 US $139 |
896:56:16 | 1100 | 61.6 | 17.6 | 1971.2 | 123.2 | GDDR5 128-bit |
1024 2048 |
6500 | 104 | 115 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R7 265[7] (Pitcairn Pro) |
February 13, 2014 US $149 |
GCN 1st gen 28 nm |
Template:Val 212 mm2 |
1024:64:32 | 900 925 |
57.6 | 28.8 | 1843.2 | 115.2 | GDDR5 256-bit |
2048 | 5600 | 179.2 | 150 W | |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 270[10] (Pitcairn XT) |
November 13, 2013 US $179 |
1280:80:32 | 900 925 |
72 | 28.8 | 2304 2368 |
144 148 |
GDDR5 256-bit |
2048 | 5600 | 179.2 | 150 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 270X[10] (Pitcairn XT) |
August 8, 2013 US $199 |
1280:80:32 | 1000 1050 |
80 | 32 | 2560 2688 |
160 168 |
GDDR5 256-bit |
2048 4096 |
5600 | 179.2 | 180 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 280[10] (Tahiti Pro) |
March 4, 2014 US $249 |
Template:Val 352 mm2 |
1792:112:32 | 827 933 |
92.6 | 26.5 | 2964 3343.9 |
741 836 |
GDDR5 384-bit |
3072 | 5000 | 240 | 250 W | ||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 280X[10] (Tahiti XTL)[11] |
August 8, 2013 US $299 |
2048:128:32 | 850 1000 |
109–128 | 27.2–32 | 3481.6 4096 |
870.4 1024 |
GDDR5 384-bit |
3072 | 6000 | 288 | 250 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" |Radeon R9 285[10] (Tonga Pro) |
September 2, 2014 US $249 |
GCN 3rd gen 28 nm |
Template:Val 359 mm2 [12] |
1792:112:32 | 918 | 102.8 | 29.4 | 3290 | 206.6[13] | GDDR5 256-bit |
2048 | 5500 | 176[lower-alpha 6] | 190 W | |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" |Radeon R9 285X (Tonga XT) |
Unreleased [15] | 2048:128:32 | 1002 | 128.3 | 32.1 | 4104 | 256.5 | GDDR5 384-bit |
3072 | 5500 | 264 | 300 W | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 290[10] (Hawaii Pro) |
November 5, 2013 US $399 |
GCN 2nd gen 28 nm |
Template:Val 438 mm2 [16] |
2560:160:64 | up to 947[lower-alpha 7] | 151.52 | 60.608 | 4848.6 | 606.1 | GDDR5 512-bit |
4096 | 5000 | 320 | 250 W[18] | |
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 290X[10] (Hawaii XT) |
October 24, 2013 November 6, 2014[19] US $549 |
2816:176:64 | 1000[lower-alpha 7] | 176 | 64 | 5632 | 704 | GDDR5 512-bit |
4096 8192 |
5000 | 320 | 250 W[18] | |||
| Template:Rh class="table-rh" | Radeon R9 295X2[10][20] (Vesuvius) |
April 8, 2014 US $1499 |
2× Template:Val 2× 438 mm2 |
2× 2816:176:64 | 1018 | 358.33 | 130.3 | 11466.75 | 1433.34 | GDDR5 512-bit |
2× 4096 | 5000 | 2× 320 | 500 W | ||
| Model (codename) |
Release Date & Price |
Architecture & Fab |
Transistors & Die Size |
Config[lower-alpha 5] | Clock[lower-alpha 1] (MHz) | Texture (GT/s) | Pixel (GP/s) | Single | Double | Bus type & width |
Size (MiB) | Clock (MT/s) | Band- width (GB/s) |
TBP | Bus interface |
| Core | Fillrate[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] | Processing power[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 4] (GFLOPS) |
Memory | ||||||||||||
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Boost values (if available) are stated below the base value in italic.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of Texture Mapping Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of Render Output Units multiplied by the base (or boost) core clock speed.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Precision performance is calculated from the base (or boost) core clock speed based on a FMA operation.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Unified Shaders : Texture Mapping Units : Render Output Units
- ↑ The R9 285 utilizes loss-less colour compression which can increase effective memory performance (relative to GCN 1st gen and 2nd gen cards) in certain situations.[12][14]
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Base clock of R9 290 and R9 290X will maintain at 947 MHz and 1000 MHz before reaching 95 °C, respectively.[17]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | OEM | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
- ↑ "Radeon™ R5 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
- ↑ btarunr (3 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 in the Retail Channel, Gigabyte Outs its Offering". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ↑ Wiles, Debbie (4 April 2014). "AMD Launches Radeon R5 230 for Retail Market". CPU-World.com. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 "Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
- ↑ [1][dead link]
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R7 250E". TechPowerUp. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 "Radeon™ R9 Series Graphics Cards | AMD". www.amd.com. Retrieved 2017-02-19.
- ↑ Mujtaba, Hassan (26 October 2013). "AMD Preparing Tahiti XTL Revision of Radeon R9 280X Graphic Card for November Release". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Sandhu, Tarinder (2 September 2014). "Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 285 Dual-X OC (28nm Tonga)". Hexus. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (10 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC". AnandTech. Purch Group. p. 17. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ Hruska, Joel (2 September 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 285 review: The GCN 3rd gen Torpedo that Takes out Nvidia's GTX 760". ExtremeTech. Ziff Davis. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
- ↑ "AMD Radeon R9 285X spotted". Retrieved 10 January 2019.
- ↑ Smith, Ryan (24 October 2013). "The AMD Radeon R9 290X Review". AnandTech. Purch Group. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
- ↑ Angelini, Chris (5 November 2013). "AMD Radeon R9 290 Review: Fast and $400, But is it Consistent?". Tom's Hardware. Purch Group. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Moammer, Khalid (21 June 2015). "AMD R9 Nano Performance Indirectly Revealed – More Compute Power than a Titan X". WCCFtech.com. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
- ↑ Gareth, Halfacree (6 November 2014). "AMD board partners launch R9 290X 8GB models". bit-tech.net. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
- ↑ Shilov, Anton (4 April 2014). "AMD Radeon R9 295 X2: Final Specs Out, Card may not Fit into All PCs". KitGuru. Korona Solutions. Retrieved 6 April 2014.