Difference between revisions of "Template:Adult model"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
blackwiki>Fayenatic london
m (clarify, indent)
m (11 revisions imported)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This [[Wikipedia:Category|category]] contains [[model (person)|models]] who appear in adult-oriented materials (not models who are merely [[adult]]s).
+
{{Cmbox
 
+
| type = content
:The meaning of the term "adult model" is not well-defined, and it may have derogatory connotations. Wikipedia policies which are relevant to this category include:
+
| text =
:*[[WP:CAT|Categories must "be based on essential, 'defining' features of article subjects."]] This category is part of a structure defined in terms of occupation; the fact that a model has done some [[Glamour photography|"glamour" work]] does not establish an occupation as an "adult model".  
+
'''This [[Wikipedia:Category|category]] and its subcategories are restricted to people verified to be "adult models" by occupation, according to [[WP:RS|reliable published sources]].''' It is only for [[model (person)|models]] who appear in adult-oriented materials, not merely for models who are [[adult]]s, or who have done some [[glamour photography|"glamour" work]]. <small>See additional guidelines at [[WP:BLPCAT|Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] and [[Wikipedia:NPOV tutorial#Categorization|Neutral Point Of View tutorial]].</small>
:*[[WP:BLP|"The case for each category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources" and "Caution should be used with categories that suggest a person has a poor reputation"]].  
+
}}<noinclude>
:Therefore this category should not be used for mainstream models, but only for performers whose work is clearly of a hardcore "adult" nature.
+
[[Category:Category header templates]]
 
+
[[Category:Human sexuality templates]]
<noinclude>[[Category:Category namespace templates]]</noinclude>
+
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 10:27, 18 October 2020