Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/17 AD Lydia earthquake"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 1) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace a deprecated template (*mp)) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====17 AD Lydia earthquake==== | ====17 AD Lydia earthquake==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=17 AD Lydia earthquake|17 AD Lydia earthquake}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=17 AD Lydia earthquake|17 AD Lydia earthquake}} | ||
− | + | *... that the '''[[17 AD Lydia earthquake]]''' was described by [[Pliny the Elder]] as the "greatest earthquake in human memory"? | |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Malacological Society of London|Malacological Society of London]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Malacological Society of London|Malacological Society of London]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]). Self nom at 08:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Mikenorton|Mikenorton]] ([[User talk:Mikenorton|talk]]). Self nom at 08:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)</small> |
Latest revision as of 04:05, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
17 AD Lydia earthquake
- ... that the 17 AD Lydia earthquake was described by Pliny the Elder as the "greatest earthquake in human memory"?
- Reviewed: Malacological Society of London
Created/expanded by Mikenorton (talk). Self nom at 08:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Nominator has reviewed another article. Article is expanded and nominated in the right time period. The hook is properly formatted, interesting and neutral enough. The article is supported by inline citations. The image in the article has an appropriate copyright tag. The article reads as neutral enough. Hook is supported by a fact in the article and by the reference. Spot check by reading available book pages cited where available and checking this show no signs of plagiarism concerns.
Sources not publicly available are free of copyright violations and plagiarism, and that they support the text. --LauraHale (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
