Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/18th Arizona Territorial Legislature"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris857
m (missing 'the')
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace a deprecated template (*mp))
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by &nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 22:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====18th Arizona Territorial Legislature====
 
====18th Arizona Territorial Legislature====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=18th Arizona Territorial Legislature|18th Arizona Territorial Legislature}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=18th Arizona Territorial Legislature|18th Arizona Territorial Legislature}}
<!-- 
+
*... that for two years following the '''[[18th Arizona Territorial Legislature]]''', territorial auditors lacked legal authority to make payments because the normal [[appropriation bill]]s were not passed?
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
{{*mp}}... that for two years following the '''[[18th Arizona Territorial Legislature]]''', the territorial auditor lacked legal authority to make payments because the normal [[appropriation bill]]s were not passed?
 
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Los_%C3%81ngeles_Negros&diff=prev&oldid=511363500 Did you know nominations/Los Ángeles Negros]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Los_%C3%81ngeles_Negros&diff=prev&oldid=511363500 Did you know nominations/Los Ángeles Negros]
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Allen3|Allen3]] ([[User talk:Allen3|talk]]).  Self nom at 23:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Allen3|Allen3]] ([[User talk:Allen3|talk]]).  Self nom at 23:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|18th Arizona Territorial Legislature|Allen3}}
 
-->
 
 
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
 
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]The article itself is okay, but the hook might benefit from some attention. The overly formal vocabulary dilutes its hooky interest. Most of our readers probably won't known what an appropriation bill is, for instance. I think it could be rephrased to make it a bit easier to understand and attract attention. [[User:Abyssal|Abyssal]] ([[User talk:Abyssal|talk]]) 15:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 +
::*How about:
 +
::::'''ALT1''': ... that because of how the '''[[18th Arizona Territorial Legislature]]''' adjourned, they failed to [[appropriation bill|authorize payment]] of territorial debts for the next two years?  --''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 16:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 +
:::::[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]]Great! [[User:Abyssal|Abyssal]] ([[User talk:Abyssal|talk]]) 15:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 04:07, 5 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

18th Arizona Territorial Legislature

Created/expanded by Allen3 (talk). Self nom at 23:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svgThe article itself is okay, but the hook might benefit from some attention. The overly formal vocabulary dilutes its hooky interest. Most of our readers probably won't known what an appropriation bill is, for instance. I think it could be rephrased to make it a bit easier to understand and attract attention. Abyssal (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
  • How about:
ALT1: ... that because of how the 18th Arizona Territorial Legislature adjourned, they failed to authorize payment of territorial debts for the next two years? --Allen3 talk 16:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting keep.svgGreat! Abyssal (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)