Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1979 FA Charity Shield"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Oceanh
(tick ok)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====1979 FA Charity Shield====
 
====1979 FA Charity Shield====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1979 FA Charity Shield|1979 FA Charity Shield}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1979 FA Charity Shield|1979 FA Charity Shield}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that after winning the '''[[1979 FA Charity Shield]]''', manager [[Bob Paisley]] quipped "I am just sorry we didn't get two points for it!"?
 
* ... that after winning the '''[[1979 FA Charity Shield]]''', manager [[Bob Paisley]] quipped "I am just sorry we didn't get two points for it!"?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/ATR-16 syndrome]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/ATR-16 syndrome]]
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Lemonade51|Lemonade51]] ([[User talk:Lemonade51|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 05:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Lemonade51|Lemonade51]] ([[User talk:Lemonade51|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 05:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|1979 FA Charity Shield|Lemonade51|subpage=1979 FA Charity Shield}}
 
* {{DYKnom|1979 FA Charity Shield|Casliber}}
 
-->
 
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is a new GA, adequately referenced, and obviously long enough. Hook is short enough, neutral, interesting enough, and cited in the article. AGF on offline reference. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) 11:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is a new GA, adequately referenced, and obviously long enough. Hook is short enough, neutral, interesting enough, and cited in the article. AGF on offline reference. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) 11:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 00:06, 12 November 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

1979 FA Charity Shield

Improved to Good Article status by Lemonade51 (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 05:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC).

  • 16px Article is a new GA, adequately referenced, and obviously long enough. Hook is short enough, neutral, interesting enough, and cited in the article. AGF on offline reference. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. Oceanh (talk) 11:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)