Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Tiananmen Square car attack"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Antidiskriminator (continue of the review) |
imported>Allen3 (to prep2) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 10:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====2013 Tiananmen Square car attack==== | ====2013 Tiananmen Square car attack==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2013 Tiananmen Square car attack|2013 Tiananmen Square car attack}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=2013 Tiananmen Square car attack|2013 Tiananmen Square car attack}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[2013 Tiananmen Square car attack|2013 attack in Tiananmen Square]]''' is described as first [[Terrorism in China|terror attack]] in [[Beijing]] in recent history? | * ... that '''[[2013 Tiananmen Square car attack|2013 attack in Tiananmen Square]]''' is described as first [[Terrorism in China|terror attack]] in [[Beijing]] in recent history? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lal Communist Party Hind Union]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lal Communist Party Hind Union]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Gareth E Kegg|Gareth E Kegg]] ([[User talk:Gareth E Kegg|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Gfosankar|Gfosankar]] ([[User talk:Gfosankar|talk]]) at 11:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Gareth E Kegg|Gareth E Kegg]] ([[User talk:Gareth E Kegg|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Gfosankar|Gfosankar]] ([[User talk:Gfosankar|talk]]) at 11:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* The article is new and long enough. QPQ done. "have uyghur names and come from areas in xinjiang where there has been significant violence one" this is close paraphrasing with the source.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 21:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC) | :* The article is new and long enough. QPQ done. "have uyghur names and come from areas in xinjiang where there has been significant violence one" this is close paraphrasing with the source.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 21:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 26: | Line 15: | ||
::: Thanks. The hook is not too long. Its cited with inline citation in the article. The hook should be amended with one "is", precisely "is described" if I am not wrong?--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 20:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC) | ::: Thanks. The hook is not too long. Its cited with inline citation in the article. The hook should be amended with one "is", precisely "is described" if I am not wrong?--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 20:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::: I am sorry, I don't know which one is apt here. So I go with "is described". --[[User:Gfosankar|Gfosankar]] ([[User talk:Gfosankar|talk]]) 13:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | :::: I am sorry, I don't know which one is apt here. So I go with "is described". --[[User:Gfosankar|Gfosankar]] ([[User talk:Gfosankar|talk]]) 13:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::::Sorry, I forgot to continue this review. I will continue it now.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 09:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC) | + | :::::Sorry, I forgot to continue this review. I will continue it now. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 09:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:23, 9 November 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2013 Tiananmen Square car attack
- ... that 2013 attack in Tiananmen Square is described as first terror attack in Beijing in recent history?
Created by Gareth E Kegg (talk). Nominated by Gfosankar (talk) at 11:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC).
- The article is new and long enough. QPQ done. "have uyghur names and come from areas in xinjiang where there has been significant violence one" this is close paraphrasing with the source.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Close paraphrasing content removed. --Gfosankar (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The hook is not too long. Its cited with inline citation in the article. The hook should be amended with one "is", precisely "is described" if I am not wrong?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I don't know which one is apt here. So I go with "is described". --Gfosankar (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot to continue this review. I will continue it now. 16px Good to go.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I don't know which one is apt here. So I go with "is described". --Gfosankar (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. The hook is not too long. Its cited with inline citation in the article. The hook should be amended with one "is", precisely "is described" if I am not wrong?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Close paraphrasing content removed. --Gfosankar (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)