Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Abandoned mine drainage"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bruin2
(Added DYK Review by ~~~~)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 6)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Abandoned mine drainage====
 
====Abandoned mine drainage====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
{{main page image|image=Shamokin Creek looking downstream at Millers Run.JPG|caption=A creek impacted by abandoned mine drainage}}
 
{{main page image|image=Shamokin Creek looking downstream at Millers Run.JPG|caption=A creek impacted by abandoned mine drainage}}
</div><!--
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''[[abandoned mine drainage]]''' ''(effects pictured)'' has been used in [[hydraulic fracturing]]?
 
* ... that '''[[abandoned mine drainage]]''' ''(effects pictured)'' has been used in [[hydraulic fracturing]]?
  
Line 21: Line 17:
 
:* ''Comment'': I could also swap in [[:File:Quaker Run looking downstream.JPG|this picture]] or [[:File:Coal Run looking downstream.JPG|this one]] (the latter one is a Commons VI)
 
:* ''Comment'': I could also swap in [[:File:Quaker Run looking downstream.JPG|this picture]] or [[:File:Coal Run looking downstream.JPG|this one]] (the latter one is a Commons VI)
 
<small>Created by [[User:Jakec|Jakec]] ([[User talk:Jakec|talk]]). Self-nominated at 17:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Jakec|Jakec]] ([[User talk:Jakec|talk]]). Self-nominated at 17:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Abandoned mine drainage|Jakec|subpage=Abandoned mine drainage}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]This article is new, nominated within the time limit and meets Wikipedia core policies. By my count, the article text is 3898 characters, well in excess of the required minimum. It is free of close paraphrasing, copyvios and plagiarism. Multiple hooks have been submitted and all range from 98 to 168 characters. Personally, I prefer ALT3 because it best illustrates the magnitude of the problem, at least within two states, and is supported by two inline citations. (I was unable to open Reference 3, which was cited as a source.) I found that fact more interesting than the others.
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]This article is new, nominated within the time limit and meets Wikipedia core policies. By my count, the article text is 3898 characters, well in excess of the required minimum. It is free of close paraphrasing, copyvios and plagiarism. Multiple hooks have been submitted and all range from 98 to 168 characters. Personally, I prefer ALT3 because it best illustrates the magnitude of the problem, at least within two states, and is supported by two inline citations. (I was unable to open Reference 3, which was cited as a source.) I found that fact more interesting than the others.
Line 32: Line 25:
  
 
I have some issues about content that I intend to send the nominator later, but I doubt they fall within the scope of the DYK review. [[User:Bruin2|Bruin2]] ([[User talk:Bruin2|talk]]) 04:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 
I have some issues about content that I intend to send the nominator later, but I doubt they fall within the scope of the DYK review. [[User:Bruin2|Bruin2]] ([[User talk:Bruin2|talk]]) 04:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 +
::*Since no issues have been found with any of the hooks, I'll note that I (as the nominator) consider ALTS0-2 to be more interesting, but I have no objection to any of them being used. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 13:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
  
 
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 05:05, 21 October 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Abandoned mine drainage

A creek impacted by abandoned mine drainage
A creek impacted by abandoned mine drainage

Created by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 17:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svgThis article is new, nominated within the time limit and meets Wikipedia core policies. By my count, the article text is 3898 characters, well in excess of the required minimum. It is free of close paraphrasing, copyvios and plagiarism. Multiple hooks have been submitted and all range from 98 to 168 characters. Personally, I prefer ALT3 because it best illustrates the magnitude of the problem, at least within two states, and is supported by two inline citations. (I was unable to open Reference 3, which was cited as a source.) I found that fact more interesting than the others.

The image is in Wikipedia Commons, where the article author states that the image is his own work and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. I think it illustrates the contamination issue much more vividly than does the proposed alternate picture. Please don't swap the pictures!

The author has cited the DYK review for The Dominican Convent, Ilanz. I have confirmed this QPQ.Bruin2 (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

I have some issues about content that I intend to send the nominator later, but I doubt they fall within the scope of the DYK review. Bruin2 (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Since no issues have been found with any of the hooks, I'll note that I (as the nominator) consider ALTS0-2 to be more interesting, but I have no objection to any of them being used. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)