Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Agastachys"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (replied on Flora issue) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace a deprecated template (*mp)) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 13:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Agastachys, Persoonia gunnii, Persoonia muelleri==== | ====Agastachys, Persoonia gunnii, Persoonia muelleri==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Agastachys|Agastachys|Persoonia gunnii|Persoonia muelleri}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Agastachys|Agastachys|Persoonia gunnii|Persoonia muelleri}} | ||
− | + | *... that the '''[[Agastachys|white waratah]]''', '''[[Persoonia gunnii|mountain]]''' and '''[[Persoonia muelleri|Mueller's geebungs]]''' are three members of the [[proteaceae|protea family]] found only in [[Tasmania]]? | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rufe Persful]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Walthamstow by-election, 1897]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Janabiyah]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rufe Persful]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Walthamstow by-election, 1897]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Janabiyah]] | ||
:*''Comment'': just thought the names were funny enough sounding to make it interesting.... | :*''Comment'': just thought the names were funny enough sounding to make it interesting.... | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Wriekhathaar|Wriekhathaar]] ([[User talk:Wriekhathaar|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 14:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Wriekhathaar|Wriekhathaar]] ([[User talk:Wriekhathaar|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 14:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :* |
:Summary: | :Summary: | ||
*1st: new article, 1507 characters; hook fact needs an inline citation | *1st: new article, 1507 characters; hook fact needs an inline citation | ||
Line 33: | Line 18: | ||
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Does the ''Flora of Australia Online'' website implicitly only include species that are endemic to Australia. If yes, is this sufficient to count as proof of endemicity? Not sure ... [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 06:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC) | [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Does the ''Flora of Australia Online'' website implicitly only include species that are endemic to Australia. If yes, is this sufficient to count as proof of endemicity? Not sure ... [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 06:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a | + | :Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, [http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/online-resources/flora/stddisplay.xsql?pnid=46093 Banksia dentata] extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | :Hence for ''Persoonia gunnii'' and ''Persoonia muelleri'', it lists their whole range - which is wholly in tasmania (and nowhere else) [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |
+ | ::*{{DYKtick}} Ok, ready to go now. [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]) 17:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 04:38, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Agastachys, Persoonia gunnii, Persoonia muelleri
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Agastachys
- Persoonia gunnii
- Persoonia muelleri )
- ... that the white waratah, mountain and Mueller's geebungs are three members of the protea family found only in Tasmania?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rufe Persful, Template:Did you know nominations/Walthamstow by-election, 1897, Template:Did you know nominations/Janabiyah
- Comment: just thought the names were funny enough sounding to make it interesting....
Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Wriekhathaar (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 14:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Summary:
- 1st: new article, 1507 characters; hook fact needs an inline citation
- 2nd: expansion, 361*5=1801 needed, at 1836; source says it's present, but not explicitly endemic to Tasmania
- 3rd: expansion, 50*5=1500 needed, now at 1646; same issue as #2.
Does the Flora of Australia Online website implicitly only include species that are endemic to Australia. If yes, is this sufficient to count as proof of endemicity? Not sure ... Sasata (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, Banksia dentata extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)