Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Approaches to Prejudice Reduction"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(closing; no action in over three weeks)
imported>Allen3
(Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 21:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)<br />}}
 +
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Approaches to prejudice reduction====
 
====Approaches to prejudice reduction====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Approaches to Prejudice Reduction|Approaches to prejudice reduction}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Approaches to Prejudice Reduction|Approaches to prejudice reduction}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that there are '''[[approaches to prejudice reduction]]''' that are not commonly known?
 
* ... that there are '''[[approaches to prejudice reduction]]''' that are not commonly known?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Secastel|Secastel]] ([[User talk:Secastel|talk]]). Self nominated at 23:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Secastel|Secastel]] ([[User talk:Secastel|talk]]). Self nominated at 23:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Approaches to prejudice reduction|Secastel|subpage=Approaches to Prejudice Reduction}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article is long enough (15,107 chars when created and currently 14,567) and new - created on 22 November and nominated 26 November. Each para has at least one citation and multiple sources are cited but it's difficult to assess for copyvio or close paraphrase because all the cited sources are printed, none are online. There are a number of statements which are unsupported by citations, e.g."It is not entirely clear how these results translate when considering existing social groups in real-world settings", or "As most of these studies consist of one-time sessions, it is unclear how long the positive effects of the strategies last."
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article is long enough (15,107 chars when created and currently 14,567) and new - created on 22 November and nominated 26 November. Each para has at least one citation and multiple sources are cited but it's difficult to assess for copyvio or close paraphrase because all the cited sources are printed, none are online. There are a number of statements which are unsupported by citations, e.g."It is not entirely clear how these results translate when considering existing social groups in real-world settings", or "As most of these studies consist of one-time sessions, it is unclear how long the positive effects of the strategies last."
Line 26: Line 17:
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I have done a final ping to the nominator's talk page, though since his or her most recent edit was December 9, I'm not holding out much hope. The issues are significant enough—especially that the hook fact does not explicitly appear in the article—that something must be done soon. I'm planning on closing the nomination early next week unless the nominator posts here before then. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I have done a final ping to the nominator's talk page, though since his or her most recent edit was December 9, I'm not holding out much hope. The issues are significant enough—especially that the hook fact does not explicitly appear in the article—that something must be done soon. I'm planning on closing the nomination early next week unless the nominator posts here before then. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
  
:*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Closing. Nominator has not responded (nor edited since December 9), and article (which also hasn't been edited since December 9) remains without specific support of the proposed hook. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
+
:*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Closing. Nominator has not responded (nor edited since December 9), and article (which also hasn't been edited since December 9) remains without specific support of the proposed hook. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC){{#if:no|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 21:03, 12 January 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 21:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues

Approaches to prejudice reduction

Created/expanded by Secastel (talk). Self nominated at 23:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px The article is long enough (15,107 chars when created and currently 14,567) and new - created on 22 November and nominated 26 November. Each para has at least one citation and multiple sources are cited but it's difficult to assess for copyvio or close paraphrase because all the cited sources are printed, none are online. There are a number of statements which are unsupported by citations, e.g."It is not entirely clear how these results translate when considering existing social groups in real-world settings", or "As most of these studies consist of one-time sessions, it is unclear how long the positive effects of the strategies last."
The hook itself is correctly formatted but I am unable to establish where it is mentioned in the article. Sections deal with various approaches to prejudice reduction but I can see nothing specific to support the hook. Maybe one of the cited statements could be used as an alternative hook but at the moment I can't pass this for DYK. --Bcp67 (talk) 10:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px I have done a final ping to the nominator's talk page, though since his or her most recent edit was December 9, I'm not holding out much hope. The issues are significant enough—especially that the hook fact does not explicitly appear in the article—that something must be done soon. I'm planning on closing the nomination early next week unless the nominator posts here before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
  • 16px Closing. Nominator has not responded (nor edited since December 9), and article (which also hasn't been edited since December 9) remains without specific support of the proposed hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)