Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dharmadhyaksha (Please no! I hardly did anything.) |
imported>PFHLai (to P2) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 13:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha==== | ====Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Buddha Victoria & Albert.jpg|100x100px|Gautama Buddha]] | [[File:Buddha Victoria & Albert.jpg|100x100px|Gautama Buddha]] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* <s>... that the [[Rigveda]] dictum '''''[[Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha]]''''' ("for the happiness of the many, for the welfare of the many") was suggested by [[Gautama Buddha]] ''(pictured)'' and [[Swami Vivekananda]]?</s> | * <s>... that the [[Rigveda]] dictum '''''[[Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha]]''''' ("for the happiness of the many, for the welfare of the many") was suggested by [[Gautama Buddha]] ''(pictured)'' and [[Swami Vivekananda]]?</s> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/1970 Bhiwandi Riots]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/1970 Bhiwandi Riots]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]), [[User:Titodutta|Titodutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Titodutta|Titodutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]) at 10:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]), [[User:Titodutta|Titodutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Titodutta|Titodutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]) at 10:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article is very new, long enough, well cited, and without problems, and the image is public domain. What is cited is that Buddha suggested to his disciples to work for the welfare and happiness of the masses under this dictum (offine source accepted AGF). For [[Swami Vivekananda]], what is cited is that he "spoke on this aphorism", stressed "welfare of the many, the happiness of the many" as a message for mankind, and provided an aesthetic vision... so in this hook "and [[Swami Vivekananda]]" is not cited; but [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I can approve it if the last three words are taken out. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article is very new, long enough, well cited, and without problems, and the image is public domain. What is cited is that Buddha suggested to his disciples to work for the welfare and happiness of the masses under this dictum (offine source accepted AGF). For [[Swami Vivekananda]], what is cited is that he "spoke on this aphorism", stressed "welfare of the many, the happiness of the many" as a message for mankind, and provided an aesthetic vision... so in this hook "and [[Swami Vivekananda]]" is not cited; but [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I can approve it if the last three words are taken out. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 27: | Line 17: | ||
:::* I have added one more citation, I can add one more offline citation if needed. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 05:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | :::* I have added one more citation, I can add one more offline citation if needed. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 05:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::*I think we have a language problem here, Titodutta. To say "the [[Rigveda]] dictum ''Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha''... was suggested by... [[Swami Vivekananda]]" is contradicted. It seems it was ''suggested'' by Gautama Buddha, ''interpreted and promoted'' by Vivekananda. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ::::*I think we have a language problem here, Titodutta. To say "the [[Rigveda]] dictum ''Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha''... was suggested by... [[Swami Vivekananda]]" is contradicted. It seems it was ''suggested'' by Gautama Buddha, ''interpreted and promoted'' by Vivekananda. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::::*We could rephrase it all to say; '''ALT1''' | + | :::::*We could rephrase it all to say; '''ALT1''' ... that the [[Rigveda]] dictum '''''[[Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha]]''''' ("for the happiness of the many, for the welfare of the many") was advocated by [[Gautama Buddha]] ''(pictured)'' and [[Swami Vivekananda]]? §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|<font color = "red" >Dharmadhyaksha</font>]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]} 05:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
::::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] '''Alt1''' is just under 200 characters. It's a bit long but is otherwise fine. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ::::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] '''Alt1''' is just under 200 characters. It's a bit long but is otherwise fine. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 05:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | {{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 13:10, 5 October 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha
... that the Rigveda dictum Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha ("for the happiness of the many, for the welfare of the many") was suggested by Gautama Buddha (pictured) and Swami Vivekananda?
Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Titodutta (talk) at 10:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC).
The article is very new, long enough, well cited, and without problems, and the image is public domain. What is cited is that Buddha suggested to his disciples to work for the welfare and happiness of the masses under this dictum (offine source accepted AGF). For Swami Vivekananda, what is cited is that he "spoke on this aphorism", stressed "welfare of the many, the happiness of the many" as a message for mankind, and provided an aesthetic vision... so in this hook "and Swami Vivekananda" is not cited; but
I can approve it if the last three words are taken out. Moonraker (talk) 05:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- I can not understand, Template:TQ — that is "Bahujana sukhayam bahujana hitaya". --Tito☸Dutta 05:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have added one more citation, I can add one more offline citation if needed. --Tito☸Dutta 05:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- I think we have a language problem here, Titodutta. To say "the Rigveda dictum Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha... was suggested by... Swami Vivekananda" is contradicted. It seems it was suggested by Gautama Buddha, interpreted and promoted by Vivekananda. Moonraker (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- We could rephrase it all to say; ALT1 ... that the Rigveda dictum Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha ("for the happiness of the many, for the welfare of the many") was advocated by Gautama Buddha (pictured) and Swami Vivekananda? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
