Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Black Squirrel Creek Bridge"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris857 (qpq begun) |
imported>Gilderien (typo) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from December 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by <span style="">[[User:Gilderien|Gilderien]] <span style="font-size:70%; vertical-align:sub;">[[User talk:Gilderien|Chat]]|[[Special:Contributions/Gilderien|List of good deeds]]</span></span> 23:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Black Squirrel Creek Bridge==== | ====Black Squirrel Creek Bridge==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Black Squirrel Creek Bridge.jpg|100x100px|Bridge in February 2008]] | [[File:Black Squirrel Creek Bridge.jpg|100x100px|Bridge in February 2008]] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the '''[[Black Squirrel Creek Bridge]]''' ''(pictured)'' was demolished a little under ten years after it was listed on the [[National Register of Historic Places]]? | * ... that the '''[[Black Squirrel Creek Bridge]]''' ''(pictured)'' was demolished a little under ten years after it was listed on the [[National Register of Historic Places]]? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Anochetus dubius|Anochetus dubius]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Anochetus dubius|Anochetus dubius]] | ||
:* ''Comment'': A hook could be possible with the tale of the chain gang or WWII prisoners, but I'm not the most comfortable with that | :* ''Comment'': A hook could be possible with the tale of the chain gang or WWII prisoners, but I'm not the most comfortable with that | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Chris857|Chris857]] ([[User talk:Chris857|talk]]). Self nominated at 04:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Chris857|Chris857]] ([[User talk:Chris857|talk]]). Self nominated at 04:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Expansion, length and refs are fine. I did look at the prisoners issue and I see its widely reported but [http://www.newfalconherald.com/Articles/DisplayArchiveArticle.php?ArticleID=5524 this] appears closer to the truth. Having an eyewitness account reported as in this report with some measure of judgement convinces me that there were cells (and probably prisoners) - but the WWII link looks unproven. Given that the hook is the weak point of this nom then it might be worth writing an alt. The other angle is that it was offered for free ... but no one wanted it [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 11:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Expansion, length and refs are fine. I did look at the prisoners issue and I see its widely reported but [http://www.newfalconherald.com/Articles/DisplayArchiveArticle.php?ArticleID=5524 this] appears closer to the truth. Having an eyewitness account reported as in this report with some measure of judgement convinces me that there were cells (and probably prisoners) - but the WWII link looks unproven. Given that the hook is the weak point of this nom then it might be worth writing an alt. The other angle is that it was offered for free ... but no one wanted it [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 11:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | {{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 23:29, 13 December 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 23:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Black Squirrel Creek Bridge
- ... that the Black Squirrel Creek Bridge (pictured) was demolished a little under ten years after it was listed on the National Register of Historic Places?
- Reviewed: Anochetus dubius
- Comment: A hook could be possible with the tale of the chain gang or WWII prisoners, but I'm not the most comfortable with that
5x expanded by Chris857 (talk). Self nominated at 04:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC).
- 16px Expansion, length and refs are fine. I did look at the prisoners issue and I see its widely reported but this appears closer to the truth. Having an eyewitness account reported as in this report with some measure of judgement convinces me that there were cells (and probably prisoners) - but the WWII link looks unproven. Given that the hook is the weak point of this nom then it might be worth writing an alt. The other angle is that it was offered for free ... but no one wanted it Victuallers (talk) 11:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
