Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Blank pad rule"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Big iron (dyk verification for Blank pad rule) |
imported>Feminist (to p2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SSTflyer|sst✈]]<sup>[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|(discuss)]]</sup> 03:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Blank pad rule==== | ====Blank pad rule==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Blank pad rule|Blank pad rule}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Blank pad rule|Blank pad rule}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the '''[[blank pad rule]]''' prohibits courts from considering [[Evidence (law)|evidence]] that has not been established at trial? | * ... that the '''[[blank pad rule]]''' prohibits courts from considering [[Evidence (law)|evidence]] that has not been established at trial? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Villa Geber|Villa Geber]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Villa Geber|Villa Geber]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough, long enough, it appears to be adequately sourced, neutral and free of copyright issues (assuming good faith for offline sources). Hook is interesting and supported by inline citation. QPQ done. --[[User:Big iron|Big_iron]] ([[User talk:Big iron|talk]]) 04:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 03:47, 21 November 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by sst✈(discuss) 03:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Blank pad rule
- ... that the blank pad rule prohibits courts from considering evidence that has not been established at trial?
- Reviewed: Villa Geber
Created by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 15:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC).