Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Brunneria borealis"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (Add subpage parameter to {{DYKmake}})
imported>Feminist
(To prep 1)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from August 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=August 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SSTflyer|sst]]<sup>[[User talk:SSTflyer#top|flyer]]</sup> 15:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Brunneria borealis, Oligonicella scudderi====
 
====Brunneria borealis, Oligonicella scudderi====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Brunneria borealis|Brunneria borealis|Oligonicella scudderi}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Brunneria borealis|Brunneria borealis|Oligonicella scudderi}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''[[Brunneria borealis|Brunner's mantis]]''' and '''[[Oligonicella scudderi|Scudder's mantis]]''' can both be found among [[Schizachyrium scoparium|little bluestem grass]]?
 
* ... that '''[[Brunneria borealis|Brunner's mantis]]''' and '''[[Oligonicella scudderi|Scudder's mantis]]''' can both be found among [[Schizachyrium scoparium|little bluestem grass]]?
  
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': Also reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Sweek]]
 
:* ''Comment'': Also reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Sweek]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
* {{DYKmake|Brunneria borealis|Cwmhiraeth|subpage=Brunneria borealis}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Oligonicella scudderi|Cwmhiraeth|subpage=Brunneria borealis}}
 
-->
 
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Both the articles are well written, long enough and posted by due date. Hook is interesting and referenced in both articles in the lead itself and verified. There is no copy vio and text is neutral. QPQs done. Both articles are good to go.'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 10:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 15:19, 18 September 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sstflyer 15:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Brunneria borealis, Oligonicella scudderi

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Both the articles are well written, long enough and posted by due date. Hook is interesting and referenced in both articles in the lead itself and verified. There is no copy vio and text is neutral. QPQs done. Both articles are good to go.Nvvchar. 10:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)