Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cape Wickham Links"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Casliber
(nominated)
 
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 5)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2016  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Cape Wickham Links====
 
====Cape Wickham Links====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cape Wickham Links|Cape Wickham Links}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cape Wickham Links|Cape Wickham Links}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the 18-hole '''[[Cape Wickham Links]]''' on King Island has been rated 24th best in the world by ''[[Golf Digest]]''?  <small>Source: [http://www.golfdigest.com/story/worlds-100-greatest-golf-courses-2016-ranking])</small>
 
* ... that the 18-hole '''[[Cape Wickham Links]]''' on King Island has been rated 24th best in the world by ''[[Golf Digest]]''?  <small>Source: [http://www.golfdigest.com/story/worlds-100-greatest-golf-courses-2016-ranking])</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that golfers share the 18-hole '''[[Cape Wickham Links]]''' on King Island with [[short-tailed shearwater]]s?  <small>Source:[https://www.agcsa.com.au/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/cape_wickham_17.2_pg_6-10pdf.pdf]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that golfers share the 18-hole '''[[Cape Wickham Links]]''' on King Island with [[short-tailed shearwater]]s?  <small>Source:[https://www.agcsa.com.au/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/cape_wickham_17.2_pg_6-10pdf.pdf]</small>
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': trying to source a photo.
 
:* ''Comment'': trying to source a photo.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Self-nominated at 02:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Self-nominated at 02:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Cape Wickham Links|Casliber|subpage=Cape Wickham Links}}
 
-->
 
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article is new, created 3 October and self-nominated on 7 October. The main prose of the article is long enough, neutral and appears policy compliant. There is use of inline citations appropriately across the article. While one online source is subscription-only, there is is no obvious copyright violation or close paraphrasing apparent. Both hooks are short enough, appropriately sourced and policy compliant; I prefer ALT1 which appears more interesting. QPQ has been declared. There is no image supplied, but I note the comment highlighting the possibility that one might be identified, so please ping me if one is added. Otherwise this DYK is good to go. [[User:Drchriswilliams|Drchriswilliams]] ([[User talk:Drchriswilliams|talk]]) 08:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 06:10, 13 October 2016

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Cape Wickham Links

Created by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 02:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg The article is new, created 3 October and self-nominated on 7 October. The main prose of the article is long enough, neutral and appears policy compliant. There is use of inline citations appropriately across the article. While one online source is subscription-only, there is is no obvious copyright violation or close paraphrasing apparent. Both hooks are short enough, appropriately sourced and policy compliant; I prefer ALT1 which appears more interesting. QPQ has been declared. There is no image supplied, but I note the comment highlighting the possibility that one might be identified, so please ping me if one is added. Otherwise this DYK is good to go. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)