Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cassianellidae"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Miyagawa (Moved to prep 2.) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome for *mp; no change in content) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====Cassianellidae==== | ====Cassianellidae==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cassianellidae|Cassianellidae}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cassianellidae|Cassianellidae}} | ||
| − | + | *... that the extinct, [[Triassic]], bivalve family '''[[Cassianellidae]]''' may have evolved from the longer lived family [[Bakevelliidae]]? | |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Elaeagnus pungens|Elaeagnus pungens]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Elaeagnus pungens|Elaeagnus pungens]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Kevmin|Kevmin]] ([[User talk:Kevmin|talk]]). Self nom at 12:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Kevmin|Kevmin]] ([[User talk:Kevmin|talk]]). Self nom at 12:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough and well enough referenced, with no copyvios (at least to the online sources, I did not have access to check source 3). The hook checks out, the word "may" being key. The wording of the 2nd half of the hook does seem a bit awkward to me. Although I don't think it is essential, it might be worth considering rewording along the lines of '''ALT1''' ... that the extinct, [[Triassic]], bivalve family '''[[Cassianellidae]]''' may have evolved from the family [[Bakevelliidae]], which survived longer into the [[Eocene]]? [[User:Rlendog|Rlendog]] ([[User talk:Rlendog|talk]]) 19:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough and well enough referenced, with no copyvios (at least to the online sources, I did not have access to check source 3). The hook checks out, the word "may" being key. The wording of the 2nd half of the hook does seem a bit awkward to me. Although I don't think it is essential, it might be worth considering rewording along the lines of '''ALT1''' ... that the extinct, [[Triassic]], bivalve family '''[[Cassianellidae]]''' may have evolved from the family [[Bakevelliidae]], which survived longer into the [[Eocene]]? [[User:Rlendog|Rlendog]] ([[User talk:Rlendog|talk]]) 19:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Cassianellidae
- ... that the extinct, Triassic, bivalve family Cassianellidae may have evolved from the longer lived family Bakevelliidae?
- Reviewed: Elaeagnus pungens
Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 12:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough and well enough referenced, with no copyvios (at least to the online sources, I did not have access to check source 3). The hook checks out, the word "may" being key. The wording of the 2nd half of the hook does seem a bit awkward to me. Although I don't think it is essential, it might be worth considering rewording along the lines of ALT1 ... that the extinct, Triassic, bivalve family Cassianellidae may have evolved from the family Bakevelliidae, which survived longer into the Eocene? Rlendog (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)