Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Chikan, Kaiping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maile66 (Maybe a new reviewer) |
imported>Allen3 (Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations from October 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | The result was: '''rejected''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 10:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)<br /> | |
| + | Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues | ||
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Chikan, Kaiping==== | ====Chikan, Kaiping==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Tong Lau along Dixi Road(European Styled Street).jpg|caption=Chikan waterfront dominated by Tong Lau dating from the early 20th century}} | {{main page image|image=Tong Lau along Dixi Road(European Styled Street).jpg|caption=Chikan waterfront dominated by Tong Lau dating from the early 20th century}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the historic town of '''[[Chikan, Kaiping]]''' has more than 600 [[Tong lau]], stretching along over 3 kilometers of roads? | * ... that the historic town of '''[[Chikan, Kaiping]]''' has more than 600 [[Tong lau]], stretching along over 3 kilometers of roads? | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Wishds|Wishds]] ([[User talk:Wishds|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Wishds|Wishds]] ([[User talk:Wishds|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] The article is new enough and has over the required number (1896) characters. However, the sources are kind of problematic. Ref 1 (qcoco.com), for instance, is a forum and thus cannot be used as a reliable source. The article does not cite a single academic source. [[User:Yerevantsi|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="black">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevantsi|<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] The article is new enough and has over the required number (1896) characters. However, the sources are kind of problematic. Ref 1 (qcoco.com), for instance, is a forum and thus cannot be used as a reliable source. The article does not cite a single academic source. [[User:Yerevantsi|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="black">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevantsi|<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] At least one of those sources is a government source. One seems to be a news site. This is a fairly new editor, so maybe someone else familiar with Chinese articles can have a look at this. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 23:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | :::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] At least one of those sources is a government source. One seems to be a news site. This is a fairly new editor, so maybe someone else familiar with Chinese articles can have a look at this. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 23:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] I agree with {{u|Yerevantsi}}'s original review. I've copyedited the article a bit, but it cannot be fixed without rewriting significant portions of it. Most references are problematic, except for one government source. The nominator has not attempted to address any of the issues, and has in the past made bad nominations such as [[Template:Did you know nominations/Shekou, Shenzhen|this one]]. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 20:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 10:33, 8 November 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 10:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chikan, Kaiping
Chikan waterfront dominated by Tong Lau dating from the early 20th century
Chikan waterfront dominated by Tong Lau dating from the early 20th century
- ... that the historic town of Chikan, Kaiping has more than 600 Tong lau, stretching along over 3 kilometers of roads?
Created/expanded by Wishds (talk). Self-nominated at 09:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC).
- 16px The article is new enough and has over the required number (1896) characters. However, the sources are kind of problematic. Ref 1 (qcoco.com), for instance, is a forum and thus cannot be used as a reliable source. The article does not cite a single academic source. Երևանցի talk 10:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- 16px At least one of those sources is a government source. One seems to be a news site. This is a fairly new editor, so maybe someone else familiar with Chinese articles can have a look at this. — Maile (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- 16px I agree with Template:U's original review. I've copyedited the article a bit, but it cannot be fixed without rewriting significant portions of it. Most references are problematic, except for one government source. The nominator has not attempted to address any of the issues, and has in the past made bad nominations such as this one. -Zanhe (talk) 20:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- 16px At least one of those sources is a government source. One seems to be a news site. This is a fairly new editor, so maybe someone else familiar with Chinese articles can have a look at this. — Maile (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
