Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas white-eye"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(yes)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Christmas white-eye}}
 
{{DYK header|Christmas white-eye}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Christmas white-eye|Christmas white-eye}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Christmas white-eye|Christmas white-eye}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the establishment of a second population of '''[[Christmas white-eye]]''' has reduced its risk of extinction?
 
* ... that the establishment of a second population of '''[[Christmas white-eye]]''' has reduced its risk of extinction?
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the establishment of a second population of '''[[Christmas white-eye]]''' has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the establishment of a second population of '''[[Christmas white-eye]]''' has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Germania Life Insurance Company Building|Germania Life Insurance Company Building]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Germania Life Insurance Company Building|Germania Life Insurance Company Building]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Christmas white-eye|Cwmhiraeth|subpage=Christmas white-eye}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I think it's good to go. [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 14:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I think it's good to go. [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 14:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 16:
 
::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
::::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes, thanks. Restoring tick per Shuipzv3's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
+
::::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes, thanks. Restoring tick per Shuipzv3's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 21:39, 14 December 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Christmas white-eye

  • ... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced its risk of extinction?
    • ALT1:... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg I think it's good to go. Shuipzv3 (talk) 14:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Shuipzv3, please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. Symbol confirmed.svg Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? Yoninah (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Yes, thanks. Restoring tick per Shuipzv3's review. Yoninah (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)