Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Constitution of Wisconsin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>IznoBot |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | {{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | ||
| − | :{{DYKF|00}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Constitution of Wisconsin]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Constitution of Wisconsin|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Constitution of Wisconsin|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</ | + | :{{DYKF|00}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Constitution of Wisconsin]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Constitution of Wisconsin|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Constitution of Wisconsin|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}} |
The result was: <b>rejected</b> by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 15:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC).<br /> | The result was: <b>rejected</b> by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 15:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC).<br /> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:05, 19 October 2018
The following is an archived discussion of Constitution of Wisconsin's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Constitution of Wisconsin
- ... that the original copy of the Constitution of Wisconsin is missing?
Created/expanded by Manny Quinn (talk) at 10:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC).
- File:Symbol delete vote.svg Sorry, although the article is in nice shape, the prose text has not been 5x expanded in the past 5 days or so. Its prose size is currently 9921B, the last version on 28 November 2012 was 8319B, so it is a long way short. Please see WP:DYK for eligibility criteria. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
