Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Counter-Reformation in Poland"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Storye book
(GTG)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 15:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Counter-Reformation in Poland====
 
====Counter-Reformation in Poland====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Counter-Reformation in Poland|Counter-Reformation in Poland}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Counter-Reformation in Poland|Counter-Reformation in Poland}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* <s>... that [[Counter-Reformation]] was successful '''[[Counter-Reformation in Poland|in Poland]]'''?</s>
 
* <s>... that [[Counter-Reformation]] was successful '''[[Counter-Reformation in Poland|in Poland]]'''?</s>
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Asia Minor (instrumental)|Asia Minor (instrumental)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Asia Minor (instrumental)|Asia Minor (instrumental)]]
 
:* ''Comment'': Perhaps someone else can suggest a more interesting hook?
 
:* ''Comment'': Perhaps someone else can suggest a more interesting hook?
 
<small>Created by [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]] ([[User talk:Piotrus|talk]]). Self nominated at 18:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]] ([[User talk:Piotrus|talk]]). Self nominated at 18:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Counter-Reformation in Poland|Piotrus}}
 
-->
 
  
:* I've briefly scanned the article; I've added ALT1, though there may be better alternatives. <font color="#8b4513">[[User:Mindmatrix|Mind]]</font><font color="#ee8811">[[User_talk:Mindmatrix|matrix]]</font> 18:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
+
:* I've briefly scanned the article; I've added ALT1, though there may be better alternatives. [[User:Mindmatrix|<span style="color:#8b4513;">Mind</span>]][[User_talk:Mindmatrix|<span style="color:#ee8811;">matrix</span>]] 18:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:*'''ALT1''': ... <s>that the successful '''[[Counter-Reformation in Poland]]''' ended with the [[Repnin Sejm]] of 1768, which abolished legal discrimination against religious dissidents?</s>
 
:*'''ALT1''': ... <s>that the successful '''[[Counter-Reformation in Poland]]''' ended with the [[Repnin Sejm]] of 1768, which abolished legal discrimination against religious dissidents?</s>
 
{{rto|Mindmatrix}} Thanks! I think ALT1 is more interesting, but I am a bit worried it could be misleading - suggesting that the counter-reformation while initially successful failed after he Repnin Sejm, whereas at that point it has alredy won, and so relaxing the law didn't change that. Any thoughts on how we could reword the hook to reflect that? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 07:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 
{{rto|Mindmatrix}} Thanks! I think ALT1 is more interesting, but I am a bit worried it could be misleading - suggesting that the counter-reformation while initially successful failed after he Repnin Sejm, whereas at that point it has alredy won, and so relaxing the law didn't change that. Any thoughts on how we could reword the hook to reflect that? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 07:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Line 29: Line 19:
 
::::::Is something like that what you were after, {{u|Piotrus}}? (just trying to unjam the nomination, so I haven't read the article. What a lazy cow!) [[User:Belle|Belle]] ([[User talk:Belle|talk]]) 15:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 
::::::Is something like that what you were after, {{u|Piotrus}}? (just trying to unjam the nomination, so I haven't read the article. What a lazy cow!) [[User:Belle|Belle]] ([[User talk:Belle|talk]]) 15:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 
::::::*{{rto|Belle}} Wonderful, I approve - great idea. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 22:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 
::::::*{{rto|Belle}} Wonderful, I approve - great idea. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 22:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
:::::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I have struck ALT1 which is superseded by ALT2. Good to go with ALT2 which checks out with online citation #1. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 08:41, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
+
:::::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I have struck ALT1 which is superseded by ALT2. Good to go with ALT2 which checks out with online citation #1. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 08:41, 14 July 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 19:51, 28 January 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Counter-Reformation in Poland

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 18:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC).

  • I've briefly scanned the article; I've added ALT1, though there may be better alternatives. Mindmatrix 18:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
  • ALT1: ... that the successful Counter-Reformation in Poland ended with the Repnin Sejm of 1768, which abolished legal discrimination against religious dissidents?

Template:Rto Thanks! I think ALT1 is more interesting, but I am a bit worried it could be misleading - suggesting that the counter-reformation while initially successful failed after he Repnin Sejm, whereas at that point it has alredy won, and so relaxing the law didn't change that. Any thoughts on how we could reword the hook to reflect that? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: I struck through the original hook, since "success" of a social movement is basically a matter of opinion requiring attribution (who says it was a success?) and/or context (e.g., indication of what it succeeded). --Orlady (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg New enough (created 13 June, nom 13 June), and long enough. QPQ done. Online citation #1 appears to support ALT1, but I see Piotrus' point. What about something like "blah was the culminating event of the successful blah"? Or "blah, the final event during blah, abolished blah"? Text is objective and neutral; and is fully referenced. Spot checks for copyvio and close paraphrasing found no matches. Another excellent and careful article from this nominator. If ALT1 could be re-phrased as per Piotrus' comment above, this nom should be OK. --Storye book (talk) 14:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Is something like that what you were after, Template:U? (just trying to unjam the nomination, so I haven't read the article. What a lazy cow!) Belle (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg I have struck ALT1 which is superseded by ALT2. Good to go with ALT2 which checks out with online citation #1. --Storye book (talk) 08:41, 14 July 2014 (UTC)