Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/DPP v Santana-Bermudez"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(restoring tick)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2018]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2018  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 15:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====DPP v Santana-Bermudez====
 
====DPP v Santana-Bermudez====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=DPP v Santana-Bermudez|DPP v Santana-Bermudez}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=DPP v Santana-Bermudez|DPP v Santana-Bermudez}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* <s>... that the case of '''''[[DPP v Santana-Bermudez]]''''' held that an assault can be committed when no positive action has been taken in order to do so? </s> <small>Source: [http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2003/2908.html&query=Bermudez&method=all#disp0 Bailii]</small>
 
* <s>... that the case of '''''[[DPP v Santana-Bermudez]]''''' held that an assault can be committed when no positive action has been taken in order to do so? </s> <small>Source: [http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2003/2908.html&query=Bermudez&method=all#disp0 Bailii]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... in English law, '''''[[DPP v Santana-Bermudez]]''''' found that a person lying about sharp items in their pocket when being searched, is liable to be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result?  <small>Source: [http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2003/2908.html&query=Bermudez&method=all#disp0 Bailii]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... in English law, '''''[[DPP v Santana-Bermudez]]''''' found that a person lying about sharp items in their pocket when being searched, is liable to be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result?  <small>Source: [http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2003/2908.html&query=Bermudez&method=all#disp0 Bailii]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Action Comics 1000|Action Comics 1000]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Action Comics 1000|Action Comics 1000]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:The C of E|The C of E]] ([[User talk:The C of E|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:The C of E|The C of E]] ([[User talk:The C of E|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|DPP v Santana-Bermudez|The C of E|subpage=DPP v Santana-Bermudez}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, history and reference verified; Earwig detects no possible copyvio. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 22:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, history and reference verified; Earwig detects no possible copyvio. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 22:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 17:
 
::::*'''ALT1a''': ... that '''[[DPP v Santana-Bermudez|a 2003 English court case]]''' ruled that someone who lies about having sharp items in their pocket while being searched can be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 
::::*'''ALT1a''': ... that '''[[DPP v Santana-Bermudez|a 2003 English court case]]''' ruled that someone who lies about having sharp items in their pocket while being searched can be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 
::::::{{replyto|Yoninah}} Yes, this works better, especially because that way we know what country the case came from. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 04:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 
::::::{{replyto|Yoninah}} Yes, this works better, especially because that way we know what country the case came from. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 04:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thanks, {{u|Daniel Case}}. Restoring tick per your review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 15:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
+
:::::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thanks, {{u|Daniel Case}}. Restoring tick per your review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 15:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 15:51, 28 June 2018

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

DPP v Santana-Bermudez

  • ... that the case of DPP v Santana-Bermudez held that an assault can be committed when no positive action has been taken in order to do so? Source: Bailii
    • ALT1:... in English law, DPP v Santana-Bermudez found that a person lying about sharp items in their pocket when being searched, is liable to be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? Source: Bailii

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC).

Symbol confirmed.svg Length, history and reference verified; Earwig detects no possible copyvio. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Review is incomplete as not all of the criteria have been mentioned. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Replyto OK, since I didn't mention it, the hook is cited within the article. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but think the ALT1 should be written more clearly. We don't really need to spell out the whole case name, do we? Could we write:
  • ALT1a: ... that a 2003 English court case ruled that someone who lies about having sharp items in their pocket while being searched can be charged with assault if the searcher is injured as a result? Yoninah (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Replyto Yes, this works better, especially because that way we know what country the case came from. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)