Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dolly's Brae conflict"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(still no sourcing supplied; marking for closure)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2016  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:smaller">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 14:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)<br />
 +
The article still has two paragraphs in its Context section that are uncited, and the article has not been edited since 22 October 2016 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dolly%27s_Brae_conflict&diff=745678980&oldid=745674589 diff]). <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:smaller">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 14:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Dolly's Brae conflict====
 
====Dolly's Brae conflict====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dolly's Brae conflict|Dolly's Brae conflict}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dolly's Brae conflict|Dolly's Brae conflict}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that although it resulted in their activities being legally curtailed, the [[Orange Order]] still celebrates the '''[[Dolly's Brae conflict]]'''?
 
* ... that although it resulted in their activities being legally curtailed, the [[Orange Order]] still celebrates the '''[[Dolly's Brae conflict]]'''?
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:EricthePinko|EricthePinko]] ([[User talk:EricthePinko|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:EricthePinko|EricthePinko]] ([[User talk:EricthePinko|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Dolly's Brae conflict|EricthePinko|subpage=Dolly's Brae conflict}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Dolly's Brae conflict|EricthePinko}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough and long enough. It has adequate inline citations. However, the hook needs to be verified. The only online source in the article is not adequate for verification. [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]) 01:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough and long enough. It has adequate inline citations. However, the hook needs to be verified. The only online source in the article is not adequate for verification. [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]) 01:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Line 27: Line 19:
 
:::::*[[WP:V|Verifiability]] is one of the pillars of Wikipedia. You could add cites from the relevant articles on the background history. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 
:::::*[[WP:V|Verifiability]] is one of the pillars of Wikipedia. You could add cites from the relevant articles on the background history. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 
::::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Reconsidering this review, I did notice that there has not been much improvement in citations since a week ago. Please improve the overall composition of the article so as to suffice the needed citations, especially for the hook to be displayed. The red links, if any, should be corrected as well. Thanks for the heads up, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]]. [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]) 00:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 
::::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Reconsidering this review, I did notice that there has not been much improvement in citations since a week ago. Please improve the overall composition of the article so as to suffice the needed citations, especially for the hook to be displayed. The red links, if any, should be corrected as well. Thanks for the heads up, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]]. [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]) 00:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] There have been no edits to the article since Yoninah pointed out that the sourcing is inadequate. Marking for closure. If [[User:EricthePinko|EricthePinko]] should supply new sourcing and reply here before the nomination is closed, the review could continue. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
+
*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] There have been no edits to the article since Yoninah pointed out that the sourcing is inadequate. Marking for closure. If [[User:EricthePinko|EricthePinko]] should supply new sourcing and reply here before the nomination is closed, the review could continue. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 21:12, 7 March 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by North America1000 14:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
The article still has two paragraphs in its Context section that are uncited, and the article has not been edited since 22 October 2016 (diff). North America1000 14:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Dolly's Brae conflict

Created/expanded by EricthePinko (talk). Self-nominated at 16:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough and long enough. It has adequate inline citations. However, the hook needs to be verified. The only online source in the article is not adequate for verification. Arius1998 (talk) 01:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
    • This should do it pp. 253-54: link Please let me know if not. EricthePinko (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Symbol voting keep.svg Hook is simple enough and verified as per request (despite the requirement of special access to the file presented). I think this is adequate enough for DYK. Keep it up. Arius1998 (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Great. Cheers for reviewing my entry btw!
  • Symbol question.svg Several paragraphs lack any cites at all, per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Does background info need citations? Other than that I can only see one paragraph without citations, the first paragraph in the aftermath section.EricthePinko (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Verifiability is one of the pillars of Wikipedia. You could add cites from the relevant articles on the background history. Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Reconsidering this review, I did notice that there has not been much improvement in citations since a week ago. Please improve the overall composition of the article so as to suffice the needed citations, especially for the hook to be displayed. The red links, if any, should be corrected as well. Thanks for the heads up, Yoninah. Arius1998 (talk) 00:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg There have been no edits to the article since Yoninah pointed out that the sourcing is inadequate. Marking for closure. If EricthePinko should supply new sourcing and reply here before the nomination is closed, the review could continue. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)