Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dr. O'Dowd"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Moswento
(ALT 1)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 23:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Dr. O'Dowd====
 
====Dr. O'Dowd====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dr. O&#39;Dowd|Dr. O'Dowd}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dr. O&#39;Dowd|Dr. O'Dowd}}
<!-- 
+
*... that [[Peggy Cummins]], star of ''[[Gun Crazy]]'', made her film debut at the age of thirteen, with '''''[[Dr. O'Dowd]]'''''?
 
+
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Poa fendleriana|Poa fendleriana]]
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
{{*mp}}... that [[Peggy Cummins]], star of ''[[Gun Crazy]]'', made her film debut at the age of thirteen, with '''''[[Dr. O'Dowd]]'''''?
 
<!--
 
-->
 
:*''Reviewed'': TBA
 
 
:*''Comment'': BFI link is currently down, but can be viewed via Google Cache.
 
:*''Comment'': BFI link is currently down, but can be viewed via Google Cache.
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Moswento|Moswento]] ([[User talk:Moswento|talk]]).  Self nom at 14:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Moswento|Moswento]] ([[User talk:Moswento|talk]]).  Self nom at 14:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Dr. O'Dowd|Moswento|subpage=Dr. O&#39;Dowd}}
 
-->
 
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
 
 
* '''ALT1''': ... that as [[Peggy Cummins]] was only thirteen when she made her film debut in '''''[[Dr. O'Dowd]]''''', she was restricted to five hours of filming per day?
 
* '''ALT1''': ... that as [[Peggy Cummins]] was only thirteen when she made her film debut in '''''[[Dr. O'Dowd]]''''', she was restricted to five hours of filming per day?
 
+
:* Plot section is entirely unsourced. Having read articles on film, I notice that the plot sections are almost always completely unsourced, though I'm not sure if there's some policy that allows this or not. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:::"Better to be safe than sorry" - plot section reference added. '''''[[User:Moswento|Moswento]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Moswento|talky]]</sup> 15:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Indeed. With that, I can finish the review, and I find a 5x expanded and well sourced article. I suggest ALT2 to whoever promotes... &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
*'''ALT2''': ... that '''''[[Dr. O'Dowd]]''''' is listed as one of the [[British Film Institute]]'s "[[BFI 75 Most Wanted|75 Most Wanted]]" lost films?
 +
::Fine with me! '''''[[User:Moswento|Moswento]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Moswento|talky]]</sup> 15:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Noting that ALT2 hook is sourced and approved, since someone independent needs to approve it. (I also like it better than the other two, which are eligible for use.) On a separate note, while film, television episodes, novels, and suchlike usually do not require sourcing, since the piece of fiction is its own source, in this case, when there is no extant film that can be pointed to, a source is needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
:::*So in other words, most film articles don't need the plots to be sourced, but this one, as a lost film, did need it. Good to know. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 22:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
::::*True about most films or books or episodes. Others may disagree me about the latter, but that was my reaction when I saw the circumstances of this article: as the film itself doesn't exist as a source, then something else is needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 21:28, 5 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Dr. O'Dowd

  • Reviewed: Poa fendleriana
  • Comment: BFI link is currently down, but can be viewed via Google Cache.

Created/expanded by Moswento (talk). Self nom at 14:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

  • ALT1: ... that as Peggy Cummins was only thirteen when she made her film debut in Dr. O'Dowd, she was restricted to five hours of filming per day?
  • Plot section is entirely unsourced. Having read articles on film, I notice that the plot sections are almost always completely unsourced, though I'm not sure if there's some policy that allows this or not. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
"Better to be safe than sorry" - plot section reference added. Moswento talky 15:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Indeed. With that, I can finish the review, and I find a 5x expanded and well sourced article. I suggest ALT2 to whoever promotes... – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Fine with me! Moswento talky 15:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Noting that ALT2 hook is sourced and approved, since someone independent needs to approve it. (I also like it better than the other two, which are eligible for use.) On a separate note, while film, television episodes, novels, and suchlike usually do not require sourcing, since the piece of fiction is its own source, in this case, when there is no extant film that can be pointed to, a source is needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
  • So in other words, most film articles don't need the plots to be sourced, but this one, as a lost film, did need it. Good to know. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
  • True about most films or books or episodes. Others may disagree me about the latter, but that was my reaction when I saw the circumstances of this article: as the film itself doesn't exist as a source, then something else is needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)