Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ducks, Newburyport"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Drmies |
imported>Drmies |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Hook is (very) interesting, and within limits. Article is new enough and long enough. The ''Plot'' section needed a citation, which I added, using the [https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/can-one-sentence-capture-all-of-life New Yorker] source. All citations check. Image is fair-use, and all fair use criteria are in order.No close paraphrasing detected using Earwig's Copyvio Detector, and QPQ is satisfied. Good to go. -- [[User:Gwillhickers|''Gwillhickers'']] ([[User talk:Gwillhickers |talk]]) 21:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Hook is (very) interesting, and within limits. Article is new enough and long enough. The ''Plot'' section needed a citation, which I added, using the [https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/can-one-sentence-capture-all-of-life New Yorker] source. All citations check. Image is fair-use, and all fair use criteria are in order.No close paraphrasing detected using Earwig's Copyvio Detector, and QPQ is satisfied. Good to go. -- [[User:Gwillhickers|''Gwillhickers'']] ([[User talk:Gwillhickers |talk]]) 21:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | *[[User:Gwillhickers|''Gwillhickers'']], sorry, but I really wish you had [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ducks%2C_Newburyport&type=revision&diff=915561599&oldid=915553265 been more critical]. Some of this stuff wasn't even proper English. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC) | + | *[[User:Gwillhickers|''Gwillhickers'']], sorry, but I really wish you had [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ducks%2C_Newburyport&type=revision&diff=915561599&oldid=915553265 been more critical]. Some of this stuff wasn't even proper English. Shit, the very hook was ungrammatical. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC) |
</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | </div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:47, 14 September 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ducks, Newburyport
- ... that the novel Ducks, Newburyport by Lucy Ellmann uses stream of consciousness narrative and consists of mostly a single sentences running over more than 1000 pages? Source: "novel is more than 1,000 pages long, it consists almost entirely of a single, unbroken sentence")
- Reviewed: 1 article of Template:Did you know nominations/Samarjitsinh Gaekwad, Sangramsinh Gaekwad
Created by I grieve in stereo (talk) and Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Nominated by Dharmadhyaksha (talk) at 09:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC).
Hook is (very) interesting, and within limits. Article is new enough and long enough. The Plot section needed a citation, which I added, using the New Yorker source. All citations check. Image is fair-use, and all fair use criteria are in order.No close paraphrasing detected using Earwig's Copyvio Detector, and QPQ is satisfied. Good to go. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Gwillhickers, sorry, but I really wish you had been more critical. Some of this stuff wasn't even proper English. Shit, the very hook was ungrammatical. Drmies (talk) 00:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)