Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Eliza Ashton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>From Hill To Shore m (give full name in caption) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Eliza Ashton}} | {{DYK header|Eliza Ashton}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Eliza Ashton|Eliza Ashton}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Eliza Ashton|Eliza Ashton}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that following a speech on the subject of marriage to the Womanhood Suffrage League of New South Wales in November 1891, '''[[Eliza Ashton]]''' was accused of promoting free love and prostitution? <small>Source: "[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=CTuwsR6a4YgC Passions of the first wave feminists pp. 24-25] "from the thoroughly indecent spectre of 'free love' and 'concubinage' - Lady Jersey's terms - that Ashton's proposal was held to have invoked." Also, [https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/157157028 National Advocate, 16 November 1891] "Mrs Ashton is not posssssed of any great intellect or foresight, since the abolition of marriage would mean the establishment of freelove, and through that, the universality of prostitution."</small> | * ... that following a speech on the subject of marriage to the Womanhood Suffrage League of New South Wales in November 1891, '''[[Eliza Ashton]]''' was accused of promoting free love and prostitution? <small>Source: "[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=CTuwsR6a4YgC Passions of the first wave feminists pp. 24-25] "from the thoroughly indecent spectre of 'free love' and 'concubinage' - Lady Jersey's terms - that Ashton's proposal was held to have invoked." Also, [https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/157157028 National Advocate, 16 November 1891] "Mrs Ashton is not posssssed of any great intellect or foresight, since the abolition of marriage would mean the establishment of freelove, and through that, the universality of prostitution."</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that in November 1891, journalist and suffragist '''[[Eliza Ashton]]''' was banned from visiting Government House in Sydney after proposing controversial changes to marriage laws? <small>Source: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09612020400200383 A woman of the future? p.84]"Lady Jersey also wrote to Mrs Ashton herself, explaining that she could no longer receive her at Government House. Until that time, Mrs Ashton had been received as the ‘social correspondent’ for the Daily Telegraph."</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that in November 1891, journalist and suffragist '''[[Eliza Ashton]]''' was banned from visiting Government House in Sydney after proposing controversial changes to marriage laws? <small>Source: [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09612020400200383 A woman of the future? p.84]"Lady Jersey also wrote to Mrs Ashton herself, explaining that she could no longer receive her at Government House. Until that time, Mrs Ashton had been received as the ‘social correspondent’ for the Daily Telegraph."</small> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
:* ''Comment'': Moved to mainspace 26 January 2020. First DYK nomination for the creator. | :* ''Comment'': Moved to mainspace 26 January 2020. First DYK nomination for the creator. | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:From Hill To Shore|From Hill To Shore]] ([[User talk:From Hill To Shore|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:From Hill To Shore|From Hill To Shore]] ([[User talk:From Hill To Shore|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{DYK checklist | {{DYK checklist | ||
| Line 41: | Line 33: | ||
{{main page image|image=Eliza Ashton, the artist's wife standing under a wattle, New South Wales, 1880.jpg|caption=Painting of Eliza Ashton in 1880|width=100x100}} | {{main page image|image=Eliza Ashton, the artist's wife standing under a wattle, New South Wales, 1880.jpg|caption=Painting of Eliza Ashton in 1880|width=100x100}} | ||
| − | :Thanks for the review. Per your suggestion above, I've added the image above scaled to 100 pixels. [[User:From Hill To Shore|From Hill To Shore]] ([[User talk:From Hill To Shore|talk]]) 21:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | + | :Thanks for the review. Per your suggestion above, I've added the image above scaled to 100 pixels. [[User:From Hill To Shore|From Hill To Shore]] ([[User talk:From Hill To Shore|talk]]) 21:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:48, 8 February 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Eliza Ashton
- ... that following a speech on the subject of marriage to the Womanhood Suffrage League of New South Wales in November 1891, Eliza Ashton was accused of promoting free love and prostitution? Source: "Passions of the first wave feminists pp. 24-25 "from the thoroughly indecent spectre of 'free love' and 'concubinage' - Lady Jersey's terms - that Ashton's proposal was held to have invoked." Also, National Advocate, 16 November 1891 "Mrs Ashton is not posssssed of any great intellect or foresight, since the abolition of marriage would mean the establishment of freelove, and through that, the universality of prostitution."
- ALT1:... that in November 1891, journalist and suffragist Eliza Ashton was banned from visiting Government House in Sydney after proposing controversial changes to marriage laws? Source: A woman of the future? p.84"Lady Jersey also wrote to Mrs Ashton herself, explaining that she could no longer receive her at Government House. Until that time, Mrs Ashton had been received as the ‘social correspondent’ for the Daily Telegraph."
- Reviewing/reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Living on the Veg. From Hill To Shore (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Moved to mainspace 26 January 2020. First DYK nomination for the creator.
Moved to mainspace by From Hill To Shore (talk). Self-nominated at 19:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC).
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
Painting of Eliza Ashton in 1880
- Thanks for the review. Per your suggestion above, I've added the image above scaled to 100 pixels. From Hill To Shore (talk) 21:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
