Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Epsom General Hospital"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Wbm1058 (comment out deleted file, to remove this from category:templates with missing files) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | ||
| − | The result was: '''promoted''' by <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]] </font><font color="#151B8D"> | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]] ''' </font><font color="#151B8D"> [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:#488AC7">(cackle)</span>]]</font> <small>@</small> 09:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Epsom General Hospital==== | ====Epsom General Hospital==== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]), [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) at 23:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]), [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) at 23:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | Per the list provided by [[User:Allen3]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&oldid=prev&diff=580194547 here,] I stopped by to check for compliance with [[WP:MEDRS|Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines]] for medical text. This article is about an institution, and I don't see anything in the proposed hooks that engages MEDRS, nor did I see anything problematic wrt MEDRS only in the article; I will leave source verification, copyvio checking, etc to other DYK reviewers, and mention that a copyedit is needed. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''< | + | Per the list provided by [[User:Allen3]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&oldid=prev&diff=580194547 here,] I stopped by to check for compliance with [[WP:MEDRS|Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines]] for medical text. This article is about an institution, and I don't see anything in the proposed hooks that engages MEDRS, nor did I see anything problematic wrt MEDRS only in the article; I will leave source verification, copyvio checking, etc to other DYK reviewers, and mention that a copyedit is needed. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color:green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC) |
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Normal full DYK review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Normal full DYK review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] As far as I can see, the nominator has more than 5 DYKs and needs to do a QPQ review. Otherwise this article meets DYK criteria. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] As far as I can see, the nominator has more than 5 DYKs and needs to do a QPQ review. Otherwise this article meets DYK criteria. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::I'll get on to that immediately, but [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/usersearch.cgi?name=DYKUpdateBot&page=User+talk%3ALaunchballer&max=100&server=enwiki QPQ checker] thinks I've only done one?--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|< | + | :::I'll get on to that immediately, but [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/usersearch.cgi?name=DYKUpdateBot&page=User+talk%3ALaunchballer&max=100&server=enwiki QPQ checker] thinks I've only done one?--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">Laun</span>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">chba</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">ller</span>]]</span> 19:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
::::Launchballer, QPQchecker is not the be-all and end-all; it's known to miss past DYK contributions, and with toolserver becoming less reliable, it's missing more and more legitimate past DYKs. If it shows five or more, then it's clear that a QPQ is owed; if it shows fewer, then a manual check of the nominator's talk page and archives is in order. You always have to submit QPQs for self-nominations now. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 18:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | ::::Launchballer, QPQchecker is not the be-all and end-all; it's known to miss past DYK contributions, and with toolserver becoming less reliable, it's missing more and more legitimate past DYKs. If it shows five or more, then it's clear that a QPQ is owed; if it shows fewer, then a manual check of the nominator's talk page and archives is in order. You always have to submit QPQs for self-nominations now. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 18:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::::Not particularly well, but {{done|[[Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth (BioShock)|Done]]}}.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|< | + | :::::Not particularly well, but {{done|[[Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth (BioShock)|Done]]}}.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">Laun</span>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">chba</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">ller</span>]]</span> 23:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] With the QPQ out of the way, this is now ready to go. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] With the QPQ out of the way, this is now ready to go. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 11 February 2019
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (cackle) @ 09:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Epsom General Hospital
- ... that Epsom General Hospital has its own radio station, "Epsom Hospital Radio", which is a registered charity and is staffed by volunteers?
- Comment: Epsom Hospital Radio did exist but I redirected it per WP:TNT; the content there was pure trite.
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk), Ritchie333 (talk). Nominated by Launchballer (talk) at 23:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC).
Per the list provided by User:Allen3 here, I stopped by to check for compliance with Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines for medical text. This article is about an institution, and I don't see anything in the proposed hooks that engages MEDRS, nor did I see anything problematic wrt MEDRS only in the article; I will leave source verification, copyvio checking, etc to other DYK reviewers, and mention that a copyedit is needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Normal full DYK review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can see, the nominator has more than 5 DYKs and needs to do a QPQ review. Otherwise this article meets DYK criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'll get on to that immediately, but QPQ checker thinks I've only done one?--Launchballer 19:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Launchballer, QPQchecker is not the be-all and end-all; it's known to miss past DYK contributions, and with toolserver becoming less reliable, it's missing more and more legitimate past DYKs. If it shows five or more, then it's clear that a QPQ is owed; if it shows fewer, then a manual check of the nominator's talk page and archives is in order. You always have to submit QPQs for self-nominations now. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
With the QPQ out of the way, this is now ready to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)