Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc."

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(tick should only be added if the person adding it is taking full responsibility that the review is complete and the article and hook meet all the DYK rules)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 16:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====FTC v. Actavis, Inc.====
 
====FTC v. Actavis, Inc.====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=FTC v. Actavis, Inc.|FTC v. Actavis, Inc.}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=FTC v. Actavis, Inc.|FTC v. Actavis, Inc.}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are '''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.|not immune from antitrust liability]]''' in the United States?
 
* ... that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are '''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.|not immune from antitrust liability]]''' in the United States?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:EricChuang676|EricChuang676]] ([[User talk:EricChuang676|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Anthonysutardja|Anthonysutardja]] ([[User talk:Anthonysutardja|talk]]) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:EricChuang676|EricChuang676]] ([[User talk:EricChuang676|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Anthonysutardja|Anthonysutardja]] ([[User talk:Anthonysutardja|talk]]) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|FTC v. Actavis, Inc.|EricChuang676}}
 
* {{DYKnom|FTC v. Actavis, Inc.|Anthonysutardja}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like '''ALT1:''' ... that [[United States Supreme Court]] case '''''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.]]''''' challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --[[User:SGGH|S.G.<sup><small>(GH)</small></sup>]] <sub>[[User_talk:SGGH|ping!]]</sub> 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like '''ALT1:''' ... that [[United States Supreme Court]] case '''''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.]]''''' challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --[[User:SGGH|S.G.<sup><small>(GH)</small></sup>]] <sub>[[User_talk:SGGH|ping!]]</sub> 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 14:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Long enough, new enough, neutral enough. Hook sourced. Copyvio check chucks up nothing.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">Laun</font>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">chba</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<font color="#00F">ller</font>]]</span> 19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
+
::Long enough, new enough, neutral enough. Hook sourced. Copyvio check chucks up nothing.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">Laun</span>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">chba</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">ller</span>]]</span> 19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
:::{{U|Thingg}}: Why I didn't put a confirmed tick there myself, I wanted a second opinion and {{U|BlueMoonset}} redirected me to {{u|Crisco 1492}}, who has never responded. If you feel it is acceptable as is then you have my full permission.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">Laun</font>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">chba</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<font color="#00F">ller</font>]]</span> 09:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
+
:::{{U|Thingg}}: Why I didn't put a confirmed tick there myself, I wanted a second opinion and {{U|BlueMoonset}} redirected me to {{u|Crisco 1492}}, who has never responded. If you feel it is acceptable as is then you have my full permission.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">Laun</span>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">chba</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">ller</span>]]</span> 09:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
  
 
::::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] '''Comment''': Adding a tick should always be done by the reviewer, not by someone else for the reviewer, who may (as noted) have good reasons not to add it. I queried Crisco because he had expressed issues with some conclusions cited to primary sources (the court cases themselves) in a nomination similar to this one, and I thought it would be a good idea to ask him to see whether those issues were present here as well. If Thingg believes the article is ready, then a specific comment stating so is fine. Interpolating a hook in someone else's review really shouldn't be done: if a tick or other icon is missing, the best thing is to query their talk page. In my experience, the icon was deliberately withheld about half the time, and accidentally omitted the other half. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] '''Comment''': Adding a tick should always be done by the reviewer, not by someone else for the reviewer, who may (as noted) have good reasons not to add it. I queried Crisco because he had expressed issues with some conclusions cited to primary sources (the court cases themselves) in a nomination similar to this one, and I thought it would be a good idea to ask him to see whether those issues were present here as well. If Thingg believes the article is ready, then a specific comment stating so is fine. Interpolating a hook in someone else's review really shouldn't be done: if a tick or other icon is missing, the best thing is to query their talk page. In my experience, the icon was deliberately withheld about half the time, and accidentally omitted the other half. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 
+
:::::Sorry, I thought he had forgetten. Removed it. [[User:Thingg|<span style="color:#3300ff;">Thingg</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Thingg|<span style="color:#33ff00;">&#8853;</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Thingg|<span style="color:#ff0033;">&#8855;</span>]]</sup> 18:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
::::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Passed.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">Laun</span>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">chba</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<span style="color:#00F;">ller</span>]]</span> 20:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 20:36, 30 January 2019

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 16:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

FTC v. Actavis, Inc.

Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ALT1: ... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Note: I did some formatting on both hooks, without changing any of the content. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 19:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough, neutral enough. Hook sourced. Copyvio check chucks up nothing.--Launchballer 19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:U: Why I didn't put a confirmed tick there myself, I wanted a second opinion and Template:U redirected me to Template:U, who has never responded. If you feel it is acceptable as is then you have my full permission.--Launchballer 09:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Comment: Adding a tick should always be done by the reviewer, not by someone else for the reviewer, who may (as noted) have good reasons not to add it. I queried Crisco because he had expressed issues with some conclusions cited to primary sources (the court cases themselves) in a nomination similar to this one, and I thought it would be a good idea to ask him to see whether those issues were present here as well. If Thingg believes the article is ready, then a specific comment stating so is fine. Interpolating a hook in someone else's review really shouldn't be done: if a tick or other icon is missing, the best thing is to query their talk page. In my experience, the icon was deliberately withheld about half the time, and accidentally omitted the other half. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought he had forgetten. Removed it. Thingg 18:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Passed.--Launchballer 20:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC)