Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fire and Darkness"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sven Manguard (Unlike this game, prep area 3 will be finished) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | ||
| − | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Sven Manguard|< | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Sven Manguard|<span style="color:#207004;">'''<big>S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</span>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><span style="color:F0A804;">'''Wha?'''</span></small>]] 02:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Fire and Darkness==== | ====Fire and Darkness==== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New (moved from draft on the 13th), long enough, "within policy", no copyvio found via spotcheck (no tool), [[Wikipedia:QPQ|QPQ]] drive-by started but needs finishing. Hook "not released" part needs an immediate ref in article (see [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria|3b]]). I'm also a bit concerned about the notability of the topic, though that's outside the scope of this review. Please ping me if I don't respond. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar [[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 14:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New (moved from draft on the 13th), long enough, "within policy", no copyvio found via spotcheck (no tool), [[Wikipedia:QPQ|QPQ]] drive-by started but needs finishing. Hook "not released" part needs an immediate ref in article (see [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria|3b]]). I'm also a bit concerned about the notability of the topic, though that's outside the scope of this review. Please ping me if I don't respond. <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar [[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 14:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | :**It won two major awards, so I think it is notable. I discussed this with other WPVG members and they agreed. I added a citation after the "not released" part, and will do another QPQ review. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|< | + | :**It won two major awards, so I think it is notable. I discussed this with other WPVG members and they agreed. I added a citation after the "not released" part, and will do another QPQ review. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Hahc21|<span style="color:#333333;">'''Hahc'''</span>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<span style="color:#336699;">'''21'''</span>]] 15:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC) |
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] gtg, AGF to clean up the QPQ loose ends. I meant notability as in significant coverage—right now it's drawing from primary and some questionable secondary sources. I'm not bringing it to AfD, but if there isn't any more secondary coverage, it might be best contained within another article (again, outside the scope of this review). (And for what it's worth, I'm not sure how major the grand prize and audience awards were at the first IGF ceremony.) <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar [[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 15:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] gtg, AGF to clean up the QPQ loose ends. I meant notability as in significant coverage—right now it's drawing from primary and some questionable secondary sources. I'm not bringing it to AfD, but if there isn't any more secondary coverage, it might be best contained within another article (again, outside the scope of this review). (And for what it's worth, I'm not sure how major the grand prize and audience awards were at the first IGF ceremony.) <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909;color:#909'>czar [[User:Czar|<font color="#909">♔</font>]]</span> 15:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:29, 31 January 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 02:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fire and Darkness
- ... that the first Seumas McNally Grand Prize award winner, 1999 indie game Fire and Darkness, was never finished?
- Reviewed: Meghraj Tawar
Created by Hahc21 (talk). Self nominated at 01:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC).
- 16px New (moved from draft on the 13th), long enough, "within policy", no copyvio found via spotcheck (no tool), QPQ drive-by started but needs finishing. Hook "not released" part needs an immediate ref in article (see 3b). I'm also a bit concerned about the notability of the topic, though that's outside the scope of this review. Please ping me if I don't respond. czar ♔ 14:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- 16px gtg, AGF to clean up the QPQ loose ends. I meant notability as in significant coverage—right now it's drawing from primary and some questionable secondary sources. I'm not bringing it to AfD, but if there isn't any more secondary coverage, it might be best contained within another article (again, outside the scope of this review). (And for what it's worth, I'm not sure how major the grand prize and audience awards were at the first IGF ceremony.) czar ♔ 15:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
