Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Frane Selak"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Graeme Bartlett
(qpq done)
imported>Allen3
(to prep4)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=March 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 09:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Frane Selak====
 
====Frane Selak====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Frane Selak|Frane Selak}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Frane Selak|Frane Selak}}
<!-- 
+
*<s> ... that '''[[Frane Selak]]''' claims to have been almost drowned twice, blown up, set on fire, fallen into a gorge, as well as been sucked through an open airplane door, hit by a bus, and has won the lottery?</s>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
* ... that '''[[Frane Selak]]''' claims to have been almost drowned twice, blown up, set on fire, fallen into a gorge, as well as been sucked through an open airplane door, hit by a bus, and has won the lottery?
 
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Old Deery Inn|Old Deery Inn]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Old Deery Inn|Old Deery Inn]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Ktr101|Ktr101]] ([[User talk:Ktr101|talk]]). Self nominated at 22:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Ktr101|Ktr101]] ([[User talk:Ktr101|talk]]). Self nominated at 22:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Frane Selak|Ktr101}}
 
-->
 
  
 
[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] As far as I can see from the article history, this is not new. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 17:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] As far as I can see from the article history, this is not new. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 17:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Line 37: Line 27:
 
********Yeah, that works, as it is less convoluted than my one. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 20:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 
********Yeah, that works, as it is less convoluted than my one. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 20:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Doing a bit of a review: the article is large enough, and has not detectable copyright problems. Given that it is new enough and referenced and no obvious non-neutrality problems, the article itself is OK. QPQ is good.  However the alt1 hook is not in the article, as the article does not call him the world's luckiest man, even if references do. Otherwise I agree that Alt1 sounds much better. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Doing a bit of a review: the article is large enough, and has not detectable copyright problems. Given that it is new enough and referenced and no obvious non-neutrality problems, the article itself is OK. QPQ is good.  However the alt1 hook is not in the article, as the article does not call him the world's luckiest man, even if references do. Otherwise I agree that Alt1 sounds much better. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 
+
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I added the ALT1 hook fact to the article, removed the ''Cracked'' ref which basically parrots ''The Scotsman'' article, and added a ''Der Spiegel'' ref with a few more details. I also copyedited the article to remove close paraphrasing. New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. Good to go. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 09:35, 25 April 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 09:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Frane Selak

  • ... that Frane Selak claims to have been almost drowned twice, blown up, set on fire, fallen into a gorge, as well as been sucked through an open airplane door, hit by a bus, and has won the lottery?

Created by Ktr101 (talk). Self nominated at 22:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC).

Symbol delete vote.svg As far as I can see from the article history, this is not new. Thanks, Matty.007 17:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

  • If you bothered to look at the article history, you would be able to see that there was a PROD tag added in 2009 and a magical page creation in 2014 that involves new text and nothing of the old one. Long story short, someone restored the page's history. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Symbol possible vote.svg Please don't be rude, I looked at the history, as my statement above shows. What I saw was a PROD added, then staying there until your expansion of the page. In addition, you would do well to discuss the editor who added it what he wants doing for the tag to be removed. Actually, looking at the logs, when the article was re-created, it was restored. I think this qualifies as creation, given that you changed the content though. Thanks, Matty.007 18:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
      • I wasn't meaning to, but I figured it might have shown up as suspicious enough to check out. Regardless, let me know what you think about the whole possible falsification of these events part, as we could refactor it into the fact that he has become an urban legend based on what are likely tall tales. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
        • I think you should discuss the tag with the editor who added it, then I will review the article. Thanks, Matty.007 19:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Outdent Please rephrase the following:

  • Template:Tq
  • Template:Tq (car accident 1): nothing is mentioned about a fuel pump malfunction in this accident. Thanks, Matty.007 18:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
    • The fuel pump was mentioned in the Cracked article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
      • It doesn't say it was faulty, merely that it was about to explode. Matty.007 09:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
        • Fixed. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
          • No, I don't think it says about the fuel pump malfunctioning in any ref. Matty.007 11:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
            • Oh yeah, I fixed this yesterday, so it should be good now. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Doing a bit of a review: the article is large enough, and has not detectable copyright problems. Given that it is new enough and referenced and no obvious non-neutrality problems, the article itself is OK. QPQ is good. However the alt1 hook is not in the article, as the article does not call him the world's luckiest man, even if references do. Otherwise I agree that Alt1 sounds much better. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg I added the ALT1 hook fact to the article, removed the Cracked ref which basically parrots The Scotsman article, and added a Der Spiegel ref with a few more details. I also copyedited the article to remove close paraphrasing. New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)