Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/George Haggarty"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sardanaphalus
m (template name update)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[File:George Haggarty (1925).jpg|100x100px|George Haggarty in Michigan basketball uniform, 1925]]
 
[[File:George Haggarty (1925).jpg|100x100px|George Haggarty in Michigan basketball uniform, 1925]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
{{*mp}}... that '''[[George Haggarty]]''' ''(pictured)'' was named [[Mr. Basketball of Michigan]] for 1921 and won the U.S. Seniors' Golf Association championship in 1966?
+
*... that '''[[George Haggarty]]''' ''(pictured)'' was named [[Mr. Basketball of Michigan]] for 1921 and won the U.S. Seniors' Golf Association championship in 1966?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/1933 Alabama Crimson Tide football team|1933 Alabama Crimson Tide football team]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/1933 Alabama Crimson Tide football team|1933 Alabama Crimson Tide football team]]
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]).  Self nom at 15:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]).  Self nom at 15:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)</small>

Latest revision as of 03:19, 6 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

George Haggarty

Created/expanded by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 15:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

  • 16px Recent article, length qualifies. Still reviewing, however, you need to revise your references, using the cite template. Anne (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Citation format modified per your suggestion. Cbl62 (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
16px Enjoyed your article. But still need to use cite template to revise references. Sources generally look good, although reference 9 doesn't lead to an article. Anne (talk) 12:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
  • not sure what you are referring to. I changed the ancestry cites already and n. 9 is a ref to the Chicago Tribune. Cbl62 (talk) 13:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
  • The {{cite}} template and related templates ({{cite book}}, for example) are not required by policy. Manual cites are acceptable. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
  • 16px Thank you. If manual cites are acceptable, then you're good to go. I saw that ref 9 was Chicago Tribune; it just doesn't take you to the article. I suspect that it's a paid subscription. I'll accept that on faith. Congratulations. Anne (talk) 14:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)