Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ribbet32 (review) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area==== | ====Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area|Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area|Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*<s> ... that the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' has lost over 71% of its natural vegetation?</s> | *<s> ... that the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' has lost over 71% of its natural vegetation?</s> | ||
** <s>'''ALT1''':... that 15% of the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' has been set aside for sustainable use?</s> | ** <s>'''ALT1''':... that 15% of the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' has been set aside for sustainable use?</s> | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Iazyges|Iazyges]] ([[User talk:Iazyges|talk]]) at 19:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Iazyges|Iazyges]] ([[User talk:Iazyges|talk]]) at 19:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Aymatth2}} {{ping|Iazyges}} Article is new enough (when nominated), long enough, nominator doesn't require QPQ since he/she has only one DYK credit, though creator has had several. Hooks need correcting or clarification. Hook 1 says the area has lost 71% of its vegetation, but Bing Translator tells me the source merely says vegetation is ''absent'' from the 71%, not that it was once there and lost. Hook 2 appears to be verified regarding the 15% figure, however, in article, it states "1,539 hectares (3,800 acres) has natural vegetation" and Bing Translator tells me the "1,539" figure refers to land ''without'' vegetation. [[User:Ribbet32|Ribbet32]] ([[User talk:Ribbet32|talk]]) 22:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Aymatth2}} {{ping|Iazyges}} Article is new enough (when nominated), long enough, nominator doesn't require QPQ since he/she has only one DYK credit, though creator has had several. Hooks need correcting or clarification. Hook 1 says the area has lost 71% of its vegetation, but Bing Translator tells me the source merely says vegetation is ''absent'' from the 71%, not that it was once there and lost. Hook 2 appears to be verified regarding the 15% figure, however, in article, it states "1,539 hectares (3,800 acres) has natural vegetation" and Bing Translator tells me the "1,539" figure refers to land ''without'' vegetation. [[User:Ribbet32|Ribbet32]] ([[User talk:Ribbet32|talk]]) 22:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
::*{{ping|Ribbet32}} You are absolutely right about the hooks. I must have been half asleep when I looked at that table, and mixed up APA and APP. No excuse. I have corrected the article to say what the source says. I suggest ALT2 below: [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 23:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC) | ::*{{ping|Ribbet32}} You are absolutely right about the hooks. I must have been half asleep when I looked at that table, and mixed up APA and APP. No excuse. I have corrected the article to say what the source says. I suggest ALT2 below: [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 23:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
*'''ALT2''':... that 71% of permanently protected land in the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' in Brazil has no natural vegetation? | *'''ALT2''':... that 71% of permanently protected land in the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' in Brazil has no natural vegetation? | ||
| − | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Being asleep, and the fact that it was caught and corrected, is plenty excuse ;) I added "in Brazil" to the hook as 99.9% of readers (including me) won't know where this is; think it's good now. [[User:Ribbet32|Ribbet32]] ([[User talk:Ribbet32|talk]]) 23:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC) | + | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Being asleep, and the fact that it was caught and corrected, is plenty excuse ;) I added "in Brazil" to the hook as 99.9% of readers (including me) won't know where this is; think it's good now. [[User:Ribbet32|Ribbet32]] ([[User talk:Ribbet32|talk]]) 23:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 06:20, 24 October 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area
... that the Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area has lost over 71% of its natural vegetation?ALT1:... that 15% of the Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area has been set aside for sustainable use?
Created/expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Nominated by Iazyges (talk) at 19:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC).
Template:Ping Template:Ping Article is new enough (when nominated), long enough, nominator doesn't require QPQ since he/she has only one DYK credit, though creator has had several. Hooks need correcting or clarification. Hook 1 says the area has lost 71% of its vegetation, but Bing Translator tells me the source merely says vegetation is absent from the 71%, not that it was once there and lost. Hook 2 appears to be verified regarding the 15% figure, however, in article, it states "1,539 hectares (3,800 acres) has natural vegetation" and Bing Translator tells me the "1,539" figure refers to land without vegetation. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Ping You are absolutely right about the hooks. I must have been half asleep when I looked at that table, and mixed up APA and APP. No excuse. I have corrected the article to say what the source says. I suggest ALT2 below: Aymatth2 (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- ALT2:... that 71% of permanently protected land in the Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area in Brazil has no natural vegetation?