Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Hilary Swarts"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>97198
(to prep 1)
imported>97198
(fix <div> tags)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, the hook checks out.<br />I'm not ticking this one yet simply because the sentence "She studied bay wrens, howler monkeys, island foxes and mountain gorillas, including an incident ..." doesn't sound right.  Rephrase maybe? --[[User:Moscow Connection|Moscow Connection]] ([[User talk:Moscow Connection|talk]]) 01:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, the hook checks out.<br />I'm not ticking this one yet simply because the sentence "She studied bay wrens, howler monkeys, island foxes and mountain gorillas, including an incident ..." doesn't sound right.  Rephrase maybe? --[[User:Moscow Connection|Moscow Connection]] ([[User talk:Moscow Connection|talk]]) 01:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
::*{{ping|Moscow Connection}} it's a direct quote. It would be difficult to rephrase without problematic [[close paraphrasing]], which is why I left it as a quote. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
::*{{ping|Moscow Connection}} it's a direct quote. It would be difficult to rephrase without problematic [[close paraphrasing]], which is why I left it as a quote. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::**I was talking about the word "including". "Studied gorillas, ''including ...''". --[[User:Moscow Connection|Moscow Connection]] ([[User talk:Moscow Connection|talk]]) 02:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::**I was talking about the word "including". "Studied gorillas, ''including ...''". --[[User:Moscow Connection|Moscow Connection]] ([[User talk:Moscow Connection|talk]]) 02:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::***Oh, that. I guess you're right; that doesn't match the initial verb very well. Rephrased as two sentences. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::***Oh, that. I guess you're right; that doesn't match the initial verb very well. Rephrased as two sentences. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::**** [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, good to go. --[[User:Moscow Connection|Moscow Connection]] ([[User talk:Moscow Connection|talk]]) 02:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::**** [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, good to go. --[[User:Moscow Connection|Moscow Connection]] ([[User talk:Moscow Connection|talk]]) 02:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 +
</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 13:34, 18 December 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 13:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hilary Swarts

Created by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 00:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, the hook checks out.
    I'm not ticking this one yet simply because the sentence "She studied bay wrens, howler monkeys, island foxes and mountain gorillas, including an incident ..." doesn't sound right. Rephrase maybe? --Moscow Connection (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping it's a direct quote. It would be difficult to rephrase without problematic close paraphrasing, which is why I left it as a quote. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
    • I was talking about the word "including". "Studied gorillas, including ...". --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
      • Oh, that. I guess you're right; that doesn't match the initial verb very well. Rephrased as two sentences. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)