Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Institutes of Eminence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Passed for DYK) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 6) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Institutes of Eminence}} | {{DYK header|Institutes of Eminence}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Institutes of Eminence|Institutes of Eminence}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Institutes of Eminence|Institutes of Eminence}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that ten public and ten private institutes are going to be declared '''[[Institutes of Eminence]]''' in India? <small>Source: "The scheme is going to include twenty institutes, ten private and ten public ones." ("Accordingly, the Government / UGC approved the scheme of providing Regulatory Architecture for setting up / upgrading of 20 Institutions (10 from public sector & 10 from private sector)" [https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1538188]</small> | * ... that ten public and ten private institutes are going to be declared '''[[Institutes of Eminence]]''' in India? <small>Source: "The scheme is going to include twenty institutes, ten private and ten public ones." ("Accordingly, the Government / UGC approved the scheme of providing Regulatory Architecture for setting up / upgrading of 20 Institutions (10 from public sector & 10 from private sector)" [https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1538188]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that a scheme for declaring ten public and ten private institutes as '''[[Institutes of Eminence]]''' was approved in India? <small>Same, maybe more wordy</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that a scheme for declaring ten public and ten private institutes as '''[[Institutes of Eminence]]''' was approved in India? <small>Same, maybe more wordy</small> | ||
Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Helmuth Froschauer|Helmuth Froschauer]]. | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Helmuth Froschauer|Helmuth Froschauer]]. | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]). Self-nominated at 11:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]). Self-nominated at 11:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. A QPQ needs to be done. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. A QPQ needs to be done. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: {{re|Cwmhiraeth}} Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Helmuth Froschauer|Helmuth Froschauer]]. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 16:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC) | ::: {{re|Cwmhiraeth}} Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Helmuth Froschauer|Helmuth Froschauer]]. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 16:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
− | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you. Now good to go. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 20:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC) | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you. Now good to go. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 20:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | |||
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 22:01, 7 November 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Institutes of Eminence
- ... that ten public and ten private institutes are going to be declared Institutes of Eminence in India? Source: "The scheme is going to include twenty institutes, ten private and ten public ones." ("Accordingly, the Government / UGC approved the scheme of providing Regulatory Architecture for setting up / upgrading of 20 Institutions (10 from public sector & 10 from private sector)" [1]
- ALT1:... that a scheme for declaring ten public and ten private institutes as Institutes of Eminence was approved in India? Same, maybe more wordy
- Reviewed: Helmuth Froschauer.
Created by Muhandes (talk). Self-nominated at 11:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC).
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. A QPQ needs to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re Reviewed Helmuth Froschauer. --Muhandes (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Now good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)