Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Joel Gilbert"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>MichaelQSchmidt
(m)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2012
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: <b>rejected</b> by &nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC).<br />
 +
Withdrawn
 
====Joel Gilbert====
 
====Joel Gilbert====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Joel Gilbert|Joel Gilbert}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Joel Gilbert|Joel Gilbert}}
<!-- 
+
*... that [[filmmaker]] '''[[Joel Gilbert]]''', known for his multiple [[documentary film|documentaries]] on [[Bob Dylan]]'s music and career, is also known for his Bob Dylan [[tribute band]] "Highway 61 Revisited Band"?
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
{{*mp}}... that [[filmmaker]] '''[[Joel Gilbert]]''', known for his multiple [[documentary film|documentaries]] on [[Bob Dylan]]'s music and career, is also known for his Bob Dylan [[tribute band]] "Highway 61 Revisited Band"?
 
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Albert G. Mumma|Albert G. Mumma]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Albert G. Mumma|Albert G. Mumma]]
 
:*''Comment'': A December 22 stub sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Gilbert (2nd nomination)|AFD]] the same day as creation, but [[WP:ARS|rescued]] through some easy-to-perform 5x expansion and sourcing
 
:*''Comment'': A December 22 stub sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Gilbert (2nd nomination)|AFD]] the same day as creation, but [[WP:ARS|rescued]] through some easy-to-perform 5x expansion and sourcing
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]), [[User:Bonkers The Clown|Bonkers The Clown]] ([[User talk:Bonkers The Clown|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) at 05:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]), [[User:Bonkers The Clown|Bonkers The Clown]] ([[User talk:Bonkers The Clown|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:MichaelQSchmidt|MichaelQSchmidt]] ([[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|talk]]) at 05:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Joel Gilbert|MichaelQSchmidt}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Joel Gilbert|Bonkers The Clown}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I've had a look through it and made a number of copyedits. It's generally OK, but a few of the sources are very questionable, either being blogs or categorically unreliable sources: specifically #11 (Blogcritics), #13 and #15 (WND) and #16 (Right Wing Watch). I don't think the article can be accepted with these sources being used. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 22:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I've had a look through it and made a number of copyedits. It's generally OK, but a few of the sources are very questionable, either being blogs or categorically unreliable sources: specifically #11 (Blogcritics), #13 and #15 (WND) and #16 (Right Wing Watch). I don't think the article can be accepted with these sources being used. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 22:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Line 30: Line 20:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] No action has been taken on the above issues in the week since the nominator was notified. Allowing one more week for the issues to be addressed, since an icon was not previously given. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] No action has been taken on the above issues in the week since the nominator was notified. Allowing one more week for the issues to be addressed, since an icon was not previously given. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Nominator withdraws nomination. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 16:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Nominator withdraws nomination. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 16:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 12:56, 6 March 2018

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC).
Withdrawn

Joel Gilbert

  • Reviewed: Albert G. Mumma
  • Comment: A December 22 stub sent to AFD the same day as creation, but rescued through some easy-to-perform 5x expansion and sourcing

Created/expanded by MichaelQSchmidt (talk), Bonkers The Clown (talk). Nominated by MichaelQSchmidt (talk) at 05:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg I've had a look through it and made a number of copyedits. It's generally OK, but a few of the sources are very questionable, either being blogs or categorically unreliable sources: specifically #11 (Blogcritics), #13 and #15 (WND) and #16 (Right Wing Watch). I don't think the article can be accepted with these sources being used. Prioryman (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Well said, Michael. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 05:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Sorry for overlooking the fact that this was outstanding. To be honest, I am still uncertain about these sources, especially quoting someone as extreme and marginal as Corsi. I'll ask on WT:DYK for a second opinion. Prioryman (talk) 19:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Prioryman asked for a second opinion, and mine is that neither source is appropriate. The first Corsi opinion piece, which is criticizing an MSNBC piece on the movie, ends with an offer to sell the reader a DVD of Gilbert's movie. Using it is simply inappropriate—and by extension, the other Corsi WND piece—especially as all the information being sourced for this article is also available from a WP:RS that presumably has no bias, The Hollywood Reporter (including the two-year claim). There's no need or reason for Corsi's opinions to be here. As for the "Confessions of an Overworked Mom" blogger, who describes her blog as "a site devoted to helping busy moms make choices about the eco-friendly, time saving, gourmet products they use in their homes", she strikes me as a very odd choice for commenting on Gilbert's work. Is there no professional, more reliable source available? This review is the sole seeming basis for the later statement, "was more poorly received" (since the other reviewer gives 1.5 of 5 stars, a pretty bad review despite the emphasis given here to its "thorough overview"), and this strikes me as a pretty weak justification. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg No action has been taken on the above issues in the week since the nominator was notified. Allowing one more week for the issues to be addressed, since an icon was not previously given. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Nominator withdraws nomination. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 16:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)