Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kate Frank"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SusunW
(bolding frank)
imported>4meter4
(promote; in prep 2)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Kate Frank====
 
====Kate Frank====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Kate Frank|Kate Frank}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Kate Frank|Kate Frank}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that when rehired, '''[[Kate Frank]]''' returned monies collected by the [[National Education Association]] during her employment termination, which were then used as a legal defense fund for other teachers?
 
* ... that when rehired, '''[[Kate Frank]]''' returned monies collected by the [[National Education Association]] during her employment termination, which were then used as a legal defense fund for other teachers?
  
Line 17: Line 12:
 
:* ''Comment'': For WikiProject Women in Red
 
:* ''Comment'': For WikiProject Women in Red
 
<small>Created by [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Kate Frank|SusunW|subpage=Kate Frank}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, within policy. Hook #1 is more interesting than #2, but is right at the edge of the 200 character limit, which I understand is a [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know#hookformat|Bad Thing]]. If you can shorten it just a bit, would be better. How about "... that [[Kate Frank]] started a [[National Education Association]] teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from her successful case to be rehired?" That's 150-odd, and IMHO, conveys the same information. Three cheers for the Women in Red! --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 21:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, within policy. Hook #1 is more interesting than #2, but is right at the edge of the 200 character limit, which I understand is a [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know#hookformat|Bad Thing]]. If you can shorten it just a bit, would be better. How about "... that [[Kate Frank]] started a [[National Education Association]] teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from her successful case to be rehired?" That's 150-odd, and IMHO, conveys the same information. Three cheers for the Women in Red! --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 21:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 
::Thanks for the review {{u|GRuban}} the only problem with the ALT is that she didn't start it, NEA did. I am also concerned someone might kick it because I could never find an article about the outcome of the case. We know she was rehired, but whether it ever went to court or was settled, I couldn't verify. What about (184 char):
 
::Thanks for the review {{u|GRuban}} the only problem with the ALT is that she didn't start it, NEA did. I am also concerned someone might kick it because I could never find an article about the outcome of the case. We know she was rehired, but whether it ever went to court or was settled, I couldn't verify. What about (184 char):
 
::'''ALT3''' ... that the [[National Education Association]] started a teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from collections for '''[[Kate Frank]]'''′s case to be rehired by Muskogee schools? [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) 21:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 
::'''ALT3''' ... that the [[National Education Association]] started a teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from collections for '''[[Kate Frank]]'''′s case to be rehired by Muskogee schools? [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) 21:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
::: Works for me. --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 21:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
+
::: Works for me. --[[User:GRuban|GRuban]] ([[User talk:GRuban|talk]]) 21:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 23:19, 18 January 2016

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 23:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Kate Frank

Created by SusunW (talk). Self-nominated at 23:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough, within policy. Hook #1 is more interesting than #2, but is right at the edge of the 200 character limit, which I understand is a Bad Thing. If you can shorten it just a bit, would be better. How about "... that Kate Frank started a National Education Association teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from her successful case to be rehired?" That's 150-odd, and IMHO, conveys the same information. Three cheers for the Women in Red! --GRuban (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the review Template:U the only problem with the ALT is that she didn't start it, NEA did. I am also concerned someone might kick it because I could never find an article about the outcome of the case. We know she was rehired, but whether it ever went to court or was settled, I couldn't verify. What about (184 char):
ALT3 ... that the National Education Association started a teacher legal defense fund with monies left over from collections for Kate Frank′s case to be rehired by Muskogee schools? SusunW (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Works for me. --GRuban (talk) 21:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)