Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Korean textbook controversy"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Piotrus
(Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Korean textbook controversy | article2 = | status = new | hook = ... that with the r...')
 
imported>Feminist
(to p4)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:SSTflyer|sst✈]]<sup>[[User talk:SSTflyer|discuss]]</sup> 13:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Korean textbook controversy====
 
====Korean textbook controversy====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Korean textbook controversy|Korean textbook controversy}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Korean textbook controversy|Korean textbook controversy}}
<!--
+
* ... that with the recent '''[[Korean textbook controversy]]''', Korea has been perceived as losing its moral high ground with regards to its criticism of the [[Japanese history textbook controversies|problems with Japanese history textbooks]]?
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
* ... that with the recent '''[[Korean textbook controversy]]''', Korea has been perceived as loosing its high moral ground with regards to its criticism of the [[Japanese textbook controversy|problems with Japanese history textbooks]]?
 
  
:* '''ALT1''':... that the recent '''[[Korean textbook controversy]]''' is highlighting a split between Korean conservative right and progressive left's views of the country's history?
+
:*<s> '''ALT1''':... that the recent '''[[Korean textbook controversy]]''' is highlighting a split between Korean conservative right and progressive left's views of the country's history?</s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/11B-X-1371|11B-X-1371]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/11B-X-1371|11B-X-1371]]
 
:* ''Comment'': By all means, suggest more hooks!
 
:* ''Comment'': By all means, suggest more hooks!
 
<small>Created by [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]] ([[User talk:Piotrus|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]] ([[User talk:Piotrus|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Korean textbook controversy|Piotrus|subpage=Korean textbook controversy}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Korean textbook controversy|Piotrus}}
 
-->
 
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts have an inline citation, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. There were a couple of missing words in the article which I have added, I hope correctly. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 13:38, 26 December 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sst✈discuss 13:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Korean textbook controversy

  • ALT1:... that the recent Korean textbook controversy is highlighting a split between Korean conservative right and progressive left's views of the country's history?
  • Reviewed: 11B-X-1371
  • Comment: By all means, suggest more hooks!

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 06:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts have an inline citation, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. There were a couple of missing words in the article which I have added, I hope correctly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)