Template:Did you know nominations/Lauren Ward

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewing guide WMFLabs Dup detector Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count Reviewers' template Disambig links External links Find sources (notability)

Lauren Ward

• ( Back to T:TDYK )

• ( Article history links: Lauren Ward
• Keala Settle
• Hands on a Hardbody (musical) )

• ... that Lauren Ward and Keala Settle are nominees for Best Featured Actress in a Musical at the 67th Tony Awards for performances in Matilda the Musical and Hands on a Hardbody, respectively?

• Reviewed: Not a self-nom

Created/expanded by HesioneHushabye (talk), Flami72 (talk), TonyTheTiger (talk). Nominated by TonyTheTiger (talk) at 05:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC).

• This may be part of a potential 67th Tony Awards day on DYK. They air at 0:00 on June 10.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

16px Hook source checks out and so does the date. Ready to go. Tony, if you are nominating this for a specific date, what about putting it there? -SusanLesch (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Moving it now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

• 16px I think at least one QPQ is needed here. While the claim is "not a self-nom", TonyTheTiger is given created/expanded credit not only above, but also in the DYKmake templates (rather than DYKnom) for all three articles. That looks inaccurate, actually: while a significant contribution was made to Hands on a Hardbody, I don't see anything significant for the other two. Still, that significant contribution (and DYKmake) warrants a QPQ for this nomination; I've changed the other two to DYKnom templates. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• Reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Wilkes-Barre and Hazleton Railway.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• I'm unable to give QPQ credit for the above review: no icon was given to indicate the review status, and the "date, length and ref check out" was contradicted by another reviewer, who pointed out that the main hook (and that section of the article) was not supported by the referenced material. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• P.S. that is highly unusual. QPQs are usually given for reviews in progress.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• Not unusual in my experience. QPQ, by its name (quid pro quo) implies equivalence, so both reviews (nominator's and reviewer's) must be completed. Note that this doesn't mean either has to be an approval, but it has to be a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)]

• 16px QPQ satisfied; restoring original tick per SusanLesch. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)