Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Leuroglossus stilbius"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>23W
(again)
imported>97198
(to prep4)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from May 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=May 2016  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 07:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Leuroglossus stilbius====
 
====Leuroglossus stilbius====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Leuroglossus stilbius|Leuroglossus stilbius}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Leuroglossus stilbius|Leuroglossus stilbius}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* <s>... that the '''[[Leuroglossus stilbius|California smoothtongue]]''' has a black pigment in its stomach lining which may help this small fish avoid being eaten?</s>
 
* <s>... that the '''[[Leuroglossus stilbius|California smoothtongue]]''' has a black pigment in its stomach lining which may help this small fish avoid being eaten?</s>
  
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Sally Brampton|Sally Brampton]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Sally Brampton|Sally Brampton]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Leuroglossus stilbius|Cwmhiraeth|subpage=Leuroglossus stilbius}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook cited to RS. GTG. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 20:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook cited to RS. GTG. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 20:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Line 35: Line 27:
 
:::::::: I'm still confused as to which hook is better—I think that ALT3 is more accurate to its source while ALT2 is closer to the article's contents—but I'll leave that for the next reviewer to determine. {{Small|({{User link|Hawkeye7}}, {{User link|BlueMoonset}})}}. [[User:23W|23W]] 01:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 
:::::::: I'm still confused as to which hook is better—I think that ALT3 is more accurate to its source while ALT2 is closer to the article's contents—but I'll leave that for the next reviewer to determine. {{Small|({{User link|Hawkeye7}}, {{User link|BlueMoonset}})}}. [[User:23W|23W]] 01:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough etc. per [[User:Jakec]]. ALT3 seems best - accurate to the source and article, avoiding the issue of why the fish would not want to be seen. GTG. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 19:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 07:08, 20 June 2016

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Leuroglossus stilbius

  • ... that the California smoothtongue has a black pigment in its stomach lining which may help this small fish avoid being eaten?

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC).

  • 16px New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook cited to RS. GTG. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 20:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

16px Reopened, see discussion at WT:DYK#Prep 5: eat and be eaten. Fram (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

  • 16px New reviewer needed to check ALT2 hook; striking previous ones due to issues raised at the abovelinked discussion. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  • 16px "the deep-sea smelt family Bathylagidae": Sorta redundant? (It feels like saying "the Swiss country Switzerland".) Anyway, the article meets the newness and length requirements, paraphrases the sources well, and the hook is accurate according to its reference. QPQ is valid. FishBase's database server just crapped out, so I'd recommend adding an archive link for that reference. (Template:User link) 23W 00:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Would a new reviewer be necessary if it's just a matter of rewording the hook? Because "... a black pigment in its stomach lining that may conceal the presence of bioluminescent prey this fish has swallowed" flows a lot better. (Template:User link) 23W 00:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • 23W, your revision flows better, but it's saying something different: Cwmhiraeth's ALT2 is talking about the smoothtongue's presence not being revealed even though it swallowed a bioluminescent fish, while yours is talking about concealing the swallowed bioluminescent fish with no implication of it being a survival mechanism. I think the interest is that the pigment is (presumably) protecting the smoothtongue from discovery, as opposed to protecting the (already doomed) shining swallowed fish. (Given the change in emphasis, I think a new reviewer would be warranted for your proposed hook.) BlueMoonset (talk) 01:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I am happy with either. As Fram's original objection was that I had given a reason in the hook for the black pigment being in the stomach lining that was not actually present in the source, perhaps ALT3 is better. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
What is ALT3? Can someone provide the correct hook? Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm still confused as to which hook is better—I think that ALT3 is more accurate to its source while ALT2 is closer to the article's contents—but I'll leave that for the next reviewer to determine. (Template:User link, Template:User link). 23W 01:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
16px New enough etc. per User:Jakec. ALT3 seems best - accurate to the source and article, avoiding the issue of why the fish would not want to be seen. GTG. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)