Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Living on the Veg"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J Milburn
(Reply)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 1)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from January 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=January 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]])&nbsp;07:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Living on the Veg}}
 
{{DYK header|Living on the Veg}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Living on the Veg|Living on the Veg}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Living on the Veg|Living on the Veg}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''''[[Living on the Veg]]''''' was [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]]'s first [[Veganism|vegan]] [[Cooking show|cooking programme]]?  <small>Source: "Waitrose has apologised for offending vegans by advertising meat and dairy during ITV's first plant-based cooking show." From [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/18/waitrose-apologises-offending-vegans-advertising-meat-dairy/ ''The Telegraph'']</small>
 
* ... that '''''[[Living on the Veg]]''''' was [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]]'s first [[Veganism|vegan]] [[Cooking show|cooking programme]]?  <small>Source: "Waitrose has apologised for offending vegans by advertising meat and dairy during ITV's first plant-based cooking show." From [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/18/waitrose-apologises-offending-vegans-advertising-meat-dairy/ ''The Telegraph'']</small>
 
:*Reviewing/reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Osbern fitzRichard]]. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:*Reviewing/reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Osbern fitzRichard]]. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 
<small>Created by [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Living on the Veg|J Milburn|subpage=Living on the Veg}}
 
-->
 
  
 
{{DYK checklist
 
{{DYK checklist
 
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
 
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
|newness      = y<!---Was the article created, expanded (5x), moved to mainspace, or promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of the nomination?--->
+
|newness      = y
|length      = y<!---Is the article at least 1500 characters long and not a stub?--->
+
|length      = y
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
+
|eligibilityother =  
|sourced      = <s>"garnering billions of views" is not supported by the source; I would suggest "garnering over a billion views." Also, "Every episode features a celebrity guest" is not supported by the listed source, which mentions only "guest" another source is needed to quantify the fame of the guest (they could have a non-famous academic as a guest one week). I'd suggest removing the word "celebrity."</s><!---Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?--->
+
|sourced      = <s>"garnering billions of views" is not supported by the source; I would suggest "garnering over a billion views." Also, "Every episode features a celebrity guest" is not supported by the listed source, which mentions only "guest" another source is needed to quantify the fame of the guest (they could have a non-famous academic as a guest one week). I'd suggest removing the word "celebrity."</s>
 
|neutral      = y
 
|neutral      = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
+
|policyother  =  
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookinterest = y
 
|hookinterest = y
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
+
|hookother    =  
|picfree      = NA<!---If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed?  If no picture is used, put "NA"--->
+
|picfree      = NA
 
|picused      =  
 
|picused      =  
 
|picclear    =  
 
|picclear    =  
|qpq          = y<!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"--->
+
|qpq          = y
|status      = y<!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look--->
+
|status      = y
|comments    = <s>Waiting for identified QPQ to be completed.</s><br/>On neutrality, the article reads a little on the positive side. I've had a quick search around but can't find any major critics at the moment. However, as with any show, I expect there will be some sources of negative opinion to consider after it has run for a while. For the moment it is a fair balance of the sources, so is a pass.<!---Put any other comments you may have here--->
+
|comments    = <s>Waiting for identified QPQ to be completed.</s><br/>On neutrality, the article reads a little on the positive side. I've had a quick search around but can't find any major critics at the moment. However, as with any show, I expect there will be some sources of negative opinion to consider after it has run for a while. For the moment it is a fair balance of the sources, so is a pass.
 
|sign        = [[User:From Hill To Shore|From Hill To Shore]] ([[User talk:From Hill To Shore|talk]]) 23:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 
|sign        = [[User:From Hill To Shore|From Hill To Shore]] ([[User talk:From Hill To Shore|talk]]) 23:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Line 58: Line 50:
 
:::::*{{ping|J Milburn}} I don't understand. I'm a DYK editor who builds prep sets and promotes hooks from the Approved page. I want to promote your hook, but the chart in your article lacks citations. Perhaps you could note the source in which you found this information. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 
:::::*{{ping|J Milburn}} I don't understand. I'm a DYK editor who builds prep sets and promotes hooks from the Approved page. I want to promote your hook, but the chart in your article lacks citations. Perhaps you could note the source in which you found this information. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 
::::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} I am disengaging, and hope you will do the same. If you do not want to promote the hook, so be it. But perhaps you can keep this kind of thing to yourself in the future. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 
::::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} I am disengaging, and hope you will do the same. If you do not want to promote the hook, so be it. But perhaps you can keep this kind of thing to yourself in the future. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 22:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:::::::*{{ping|J Milburn}} I am shocked at your disregard of [[WP:AGF]]. I am also surprised that you see fit to argue with the editor who is promoting your hooks. In future, I think you should stop submitting hooks to DYK so you won't be disturbed. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 +
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Replacing tick because the chart is a list of episodes and not a paragraph, and therefore Rule D2 does not apply. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 07:12, 11 February 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Living on the Veg

Created by J Milburn (talk). Self-nominated at 15:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

I have fixed the "billions" and "celebrity" issue; both fair comments. I'll post back when the QPQ review is complete. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
QPQ review complete, a whole minute later. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
I copied your bold/italic setting for the hook link to my own DYK but was told the link should be bold only. Is there any reason for the italics in this case? Other than that, I am happy to approve this whenever Whispyhistory is finished with their review. From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Yes - we italicise the titles of TV programmes (as well as books, films, magazines, etc.): see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Reviewing...New enough, long enough, reads well, hook in article and followed by inline citation. Copyvio isn't working for me (will try later). You could have a hook about advertising meat during a vegan show. Whispyhistory (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Template:Reply. I don't know what happened...please carry on a do the review. I quite enjoyed the article and thought the advert of meat during the first episode was odd. My earwig copyvio keeps telling me to try again later.
No problem, this is my first DYK review so having a second pair of eyes on it is useful. The Earwig copyvio tool has been down for a day or two due to a problem with the IP addresses. An issue report has been filed and some people with technical skills are working on it. I've read through all of the sources as part of the review and am satisfied that we have no copyvios here. ALT1 isn't to my personal taste but I don't see anything wrong with it from a practical standpoint. From looking at previous cases I assume I can approve both and someone later in the chain will decide which one to use. From Hill To Shore (talk) 18:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm not too keen on ALT1, but agree that there's potentially a good hook here. How about:

Looks good. Just check length. Whispyhistory (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg It comes in at 163 characters, so well within the 200 limit. Both original hook and ALT2 approved. From Hill To Shore (talk) 18:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but the chart needs some kind of sourcing per Rule D2. Where did you get this information? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I do not understand what you are saying. Please rephrase in plain English or, preferably, leave me alone. Spewing bureaucratic gibberish at me twice in a week after, to my knowledge, we've never met before? Why are you doing this? Josh Milburn (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I don't understand. I'm a DYK editor who builds prep sets and promotes hooks from the Approved page. I want to promote your hook, but the chart in your article lacks citations. Perhaps you could note the source in which you found this information. Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I am disengaging, and hope you will do the same. If you do not want to promote the hook, so be it. But perhaps you can keep this kind of thing to yourself in the future. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I am shocked at your disregard of WP:AGF. I am also surprised that you see fit to argue with the editor who is promoting your hooks. In future, I think you should stop submitting hooks to DYK so you won't be disturbed. Yoninah (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Replacing tick because the chart is a list of episodes and not a paragraph, and therefore Rule D2 does not apply. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)