Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Mann's Creek Railroad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Herostratus (reviewed, good to go) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from April 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Sven Manguard|<span style="color:#207004;">'''<big>S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</span>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><span style="color:F0A804;">'''Wha?'''</span></small>]] 07:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Mann's Creek Railroad==== | ====Mann's Creek Railroad==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Mann's Creek Railroad|Mann's Creek Railroad}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Mann's Creek Railroad|Mann's Creek Railroad}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that although only {{convert|9|mi|km}} long, the '''[[Mann's Creek Railroad]]''' serviced 193 [[Coke (fuel)#Beehive coke oven|beehive coke ovens]]? | * ... that although only {{convert|9|mi|km}} long, the '''[[Mann's Creek Railroad]]''' serviced 193 [[Coke (fuel)#Beehive coke oven|beehive coke ovens]]? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Coptotermes elisae|Coptotermes elisae]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Coptotermes elisae|Coptotermes elisae]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:MountainRail|MountainRail]] ([[User talk:MountainRail|talk]]). Self nominated at 11:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:MountainRail|MountainRail]] ([[User talk:MountainRail|talk]]). Self nominated at 11:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]'''Good to go.''' Article: New, check (made April 5, nominated April 8). Length, check (1619 text characters). Policy, check (no POV, references correct, plaigarism/copyvio check comes up clean). Hook: length, check (99 characters). Interesting, neutral, the facts are supported by the refs which are properly placed. Other: no image, nominator did indeed review another DYK nom. General: good article IMO. Short, but there's not that much to say about the subject. Obscure subject, but IMO would probably be kept at AfD. Ref's look reliable, particularly given obscurity of the subject. No other issues, good to go. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 16:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 06:42, 1 February 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 07:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Mann's Creek Railroad
- ... that although only 9 miles (14 km) long, the Mann's Creek Railroad serviced 193 beehive coke ovens?
- Reviewed: Coptotermes elisae
Created by MountainRail (talk). Self nominated at 11:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC).
Good to go. Article: New, check (made April 5, nominated April 8). Length, check (1619 text characters). Policy, check (no POV, references correct, plaigarism/copyvio check comes up clean). Hook: length, check (99 characters). Interesting, neutral, the facts are supported by the refs which are properly placed. Other: no image, nominator did indeed review another DYK nom. General: good article IMO. Short, but there's not that much to say about the subject. Obscure subject, but IMO would probably be kept at AfD. Ref's look reliable, particularly given obscurity of the subject. No other issues, good to go. Herostratus (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)