Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Moseley Park"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Horsegeek (Sign) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 1) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Moseley Park==== | ====Moseley Park==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Moseley Park|Moseley Park}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Moseley Park|Moseley Park}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that you need a key to get into '''[[Moseley Park]]'''? <small>Source: "The 11 acre park is private and residents are only able to get it by buying a key." ([https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/armed-police-search-moseley-park-13140354])</small> | * ... that you need a key to get into '''[[Moseley Park]]'''? <small>Source: "The 11 acre park is private and residents are only able to get it by buying a key." ([https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/armed-police-search-moseley-park-13140354])</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Moseley Park]]''' makes the [[Moseley|the local area]] better than [[Mayfair]] and [[Muswell Hill]]? <small>Source: "Moseley in south-east Birmingham was this year named the best place in the UK for city living by the Sunday Times, beating London’s Mayfair and Muswell Hill to the top spot. Judges commended its “village community” – and if pubs and parks are high on your list of desirables, Moseley certainly delivers." ([https://www.theguardian.com/best-of-birmingham/2015/sep/09/where-should-i-live-in-birmingham-find-your-part-of-town])</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Moseley Park]]''' makes the [[Moseley|the local area]] better than [[Mayfair]] and [[Muswell Hill]]? <small>Source: "Moseley in south-east Birmingham was this year named the best place in the UK for city living by the Sunday Times, beating London’s Mayfair and Muswell Hill to the top spot. Judges commended its “village community” – and if pubs and parks are high on your list of desirables, Moseley certainly delivers." ([https://www.theguardian.com/best-of-birmingham/2015/sep/09/where-should-i-live-in-birmingham-find-your-part-of-town])</small> | ||
Line 17: | Line 12: | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/A load of old cobblers|A load of old cobblers]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/A load of old cobblers|A load of old cobblers]] | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]), [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]), and [[User:Pigsonthewing|Pigsonthewing]] ([[User talk:Pigsonthewing|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]) at 21:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]), [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]), and [[User:Pigsonthewing|Pigsonthewing]] ([[User talk:Pigsonthewing|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]) at 21:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I find the first hook very interesting. Doesn't look to be any problems, the fact is sourced. [[User:Horsegeek|<span style="color: #666000;">Horsegeek</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Horsegeek|<span style="color: teal;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 00:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I find the first hook very interesting. Doesn't look to be any problems, the fact is sourced. [[User:Horsegeek|<span style="color: #666000;">Horsegeek</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Horsegeek|<span style="color: teal;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 00:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
Line 28: | Line 18: | ||
:::: Need a review for ALT2. {{u|Horsegeek}}, are you still available? --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 11:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC) | :::: Need a review for ALT2. {{u|Horsegeek}}, are you still available? --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 11:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
− | :* Still pretty new at this reviewing thing, sorry for not seeing this earlier {{u|Philafrenzy}}! I looked over ALT2 and can’t find the fact sourced in the article, is it in one of the sources? [[User:Horsegeek|<span style="color: #666000;">Horsegeek</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Horsegeek|<span style="color: teal;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 15:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Horsegeek | + | :* Still pretty new at this reviewing thing, sorry for not seeing this earlier {{u|Philafrenzy}}! I looked over ALT2 and can’t find the fact sourced in the article, is it in one of the sources? [[User:Horsegeek|<span style="color: #666000;">Horsegeek</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Horsegeek|<span style="color: teal;">(talk)</span>]]</sup> 15:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Horsegeek</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− |
Latest revision as of 06:02, 12 June 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Moseley Park
- ... that you need a key to get into Moseley Park? Source: "The 11 acre park is private and residents are only able to get it by buying a key." ([1])
- ALT1:... that Moseley Park makes the the local area better than Mayfair and Muswell Hill? Source: "Moseley in south-east Birmingham was this year named the best place in the UK for city living by the Sunday Times, beating London’s Mayfair and Muswell Hill to the top spot. Judges commended its “village community” – and if pubs and parks are high on your list of desirables, Moseley certainly delivers." ([2])
- ALT1a:... that Birmingham's Moseley Park area is better than London's Mayfair? Philafrenzy (talk) 06:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Alt2 ... that Moseley Park was created for the enjoyment of the people of Birmingham but is now kept under lock and key? Philafrenzy (talk) 06:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- ALT1:... that Moseley Park makes the the local area better than Mayfair and Muswell Hill? Source: "Moseley in south-east Birmingham was this year named the best place in the UK for city living by the Sunday Times, beating London’s Mayfair and Muswell Hill to the top spot. Judges commended its “village community” – and if pubs and parks are high on your list of desirables, Moseley certainly delivers." ([2])
- Reviewed: A load of old cobblers
Moved to mainspace by Ritchie333 (talk), Whispyhistory (talk), and Pigsonthewing (talk). Nominated by Ritchie333 (talk) at 21:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC).
I find the first hook very interesting. Doesn't look to be any problems, the fact is sourced. Horsegeek(talk) 00:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Added a couple of Alts for your consideration Template:Ping Philafrenzy (talk) 06:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Need a review for ALT2. Template:U, are you still available? --valereee (talk) 11:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Still pretty new at this reviewing thing, sorry for not seeing this earlier Template:U! I looked over ALT2 and can’t find the fact sourced in the article, is it in one of the sources? Horsegeek(talk) 15:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Horsegeek