Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nannophrys ceylonensis, Nannophrys marmorata"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(promoted to prep 2)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
====Nannophrys ceylonensis, Nannophrys marmorata====
 
====Nannophrys ceylonensis, Nannophrys marmorata====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Nannophrys ceylonensis, Nannophrys marmorata|Nannophrys ceylonensis|Nannophrys marmorata}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Nannophrys ceylonensis, Nannophrys marmorata|Nannophrys ceylonensis|Nannophrys marmorata}}
{{*mp}}... that the [[tadpole]]s of the '''[[Nannophrys ceylonensis|Sri Lanka rock frog]]''' and the '''[[Nannophrys marmorata|Kirtisinghe's rock frog]]''' are often found on wet rocks near mountain streams?
+
*... that the [[tadpole]]s of the '''[[Nannophrys ceylonensis|Sri Lanka rock frog]]''' and the '''[[Nannophrys marmorata|Kirtisinghe's rock frog]]''' are often found on wet rocks near mountain streams?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Radzanów, Mława County|Radzanów, Mława County]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Radzanów, Mława County|Radzanów, Mława County]]
 
:*''Comment'': Also reviewed [[Val-Saint-Lambert Abbey]]
 
:*''Comment'': Also reviewed [[Val-Saint-Lambert Abbey]]

Latest revision as of 12:55, 7 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 22:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Nannophrys ceylonensis, Nannophrys marmorata

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nom at 10:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. Adequate length, expansion and referencing within the allotted time. Hook checks out and is within guidelines. Rlendog (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)