Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Neil McLaughlin"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kosack
(+ comment)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Neil McLaughlin}}
 
{{DYK header|Neil McLaughlin}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Neil McLaughlin|Neil McLaughlin}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Neil McLaughlin|Neil McLaughlin}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' started boxing "by mistake" after an argument with his gymnastics coach?  <small>Source: [https://www.derryjournal.com/sport/other-sport/derry-olympian-neil-passes-on-1-5773990 Derry Journal]</small>
 
* ... that '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' started boxing "by mistake" after an argument with his gymnastics coach?  <small>Source: [https://www.derryjournal.com/sport/other-sport/derry-olympian-neil-passes-on-1-5773990 Derry Journal]</small>
 
** <s>'''ALT1''':... that [[Boxing|boxer]] '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' was shot at by soldiers after throwing stones at vehicles during [[Bloody Sunday (1972)|Bloody Sunday]]?  <small>Source: [https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/olympic-boxer-ducked-bullets-in-bogside-26093289.html Irish Independent]</small></s>
 
** <s>'''ALT1''':... that [[Boxing|boxer]] '''[[Neil McLaughlin]]''' was shot at by soldiers after throwing stones at vehicles during [[Bloody Sunday (1972)|Bloody Sunday]]?  <small>Source: [https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/olympic-boxer-ducked-bullets-in-bogside-26093289.html Irish Independent]</small></s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bambang Soegeng|Bambang Soegeng]]  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bambang Soegeng|Bambang Soegeng]]  
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Neil McLaughlin|Kosack|subpage=Neil McLaughlin}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*  
 
:*  
Line 23: Line 15:
 
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
 
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
 
|newness      = y
 
|newness      = y
|length      = y<!---Is the article at least 1500 bytes long and not a stub?--->
+
|length      = y
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
+
|eligibilityother =  
|sourced      = y<!---Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?--->
+
|sourced      = y
|neutral      = y<!---Does the article cover all major viewpoints in a straightforward manner without using promotional or overly negative language?--->
+
|neutral      = y
|plagiarismfree = y<!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?--->
+
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
+
|policyother  =  
 
|hookcited    = y <s>First hook is sourced. Second hook's source looks to be reporting on what McLaughlin said rather than the source itself saying it happened. Obviously no big deal if we go with the first one, and trivial to correct if the second is preferred.</s>
 
|hookcited    = y <s>First hook is sourced. Second hook's source looks to be reporting on what McLaughlin said rather than the source itself saying it happened. Obviously no big deal if we go with the first one, and trivial to correct if the second is preferred.</s>
|hookinterest = y<!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?--->
+
|hookinterest = y
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
+
|hookother    =  
|picfree      = <!---If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed?  If no picture is used, put "NA"--->
+
|picfree      =  
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picused      =  
|picclear    = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picclear    =  
|qpq          = pending<!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"--->
+
|qpq          = pending
|status      = ?<!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look--->
+
|status      = ?
 
|comments    = Presuming a mild preference for the first hook (since it's first). I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other. They're both "hooky" and the second can easily be fixed. <br/>  
 
|comments    = Presuming a mild preference for the first hook (since it's first). I don't have a strong feeling one way or the other. They're both "hooky" and the second can easily be fixed. <br/>  
|sign        = &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 17:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
+
|sign        = &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 17:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
 
::{{re|Rhododendrites}} Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::{{re|Rhododendrites}} Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] good to go with the first hook &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] good to go with the first hook &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::Aside: I never know what to do with the checklist once problems are addressed, since you can't keep a comment and change to "y" (and deleting the comment removes context). Is this way of just moving on from the checklist after it's been responded to ok? &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::Aside: I never know what to do with the checklist once problems are addressed, since you can't keep a comment and change to "y" (and deleting the comment removes context). Is this way of just moving on from the checklist after it's been responded to ok? &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
::::Sure, I don't see why not. The approval tick would indicate a pass and the discussion is there for context. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 20:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
+
::::Sure, I don't see why not. The approval tick would indicate a pass and the discussion is there for context. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 20:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 23:39, 7 January 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Neil McLaughlin

5x expanded by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 20:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

Template:Re Thanks for the review, I've added my QPQ in for this now. Happy to stick with the first hook. Kosack (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg good to go with the first hook — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Aside: I never know what to do with the checklist once problems are addressed, since you can't keep a comment and change to "y" (and deleting the comment removes context). Is this way of just moving on from the checklist after it's been responded to ok? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Sure, I don't see why not. The approval tick would indicate a pass and the discussion is there for context. Kosack (talk) 20:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)