Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Oxbow Inlet"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
(AGF good to go)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 14:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Oxbow Inlet====
 
====Oxbow Inlet====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Oxbow Inlet|Oxbow Inlet}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Oxbow Inlet|Oxbow Inlet}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the silica, iron, magnesium, calcium, and sulfate concentrations of the {{convert|1.5|mi|km|adj=on}} long '''[[Oxbow Inlet]]''' were measured in 1966?
 
* ... that the silica, iron, magnesium, calcium, and sulfate concentrations of the {{convert|1.5|mi|km|adj=on}} long '''[[Oxbow Inlet]]''' were measured in 1966?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/United States presidential election, 2024]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/United States presidential election, 2024]]
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Jakec|Jakec]] ([[User talk:Jakec|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Jakec|Jakec]] ([[User talk:Jakec|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Oxbow Inlet|Jakec|subpage=Oxbow Inlet}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* '''Comment''' That hook is VERY dull. Is it not possible to find something even vaguely interesting? [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 14:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 
:* '''Comment''' That hook is VERY dull. Is it not possible to find something even vaguely interesting? [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 14:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 17:
 
:*ALT1 is okay, but it might be better if it mentions what was measured (especially as some are strictly speaking elements, not minerals). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 22:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 
:*ALT1 is okay, but it might be better if it mentions what was measured (especially as some are strictly speaking elements, not minerals). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 22:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 
::* Thank you [[User:Jakec|Jakob]] for your helpful comment. I have adjusted ALT1 in line with that. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 
::* Thank you [[User:Jakec|Jakob]] for your helpful comment. I have adjusted ALT1 in line with that. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
:::* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I wasn't planning to review this, but as no one else has, and some might think that I was or was planning to review it, I might as well. New enough. Long enough. NPOV. AGF on the hook fact and citation as the excerpt available online does not fully confirm it, but I see no reason to doubt it. Article is well-cited and all paras have cites. Dup detector found no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. Earwig returned a score of only 1%. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 13:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
+
:::* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I wasn't planning to review this, but as no one else has, and some might think that I was or was planning to review it, I might as well. New enough. Long enough. NPOV. AGF on the hook fact and citation as the excerpt available online does not fully confirm it, but I see no reason to doubt it. Article is well-cited and all paras have cites. Dup detector found no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. Earwig returned a score of only 1%. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 13:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 14:03, 18 December 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Oxbow Inlet

  • ... that the silica, iron, magnesium, calcium, and sulfate concentrations of the 1.5-mile (2.4 km) long Oxbow Inlet were measured in 1966?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 16:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC).

  • Comment That hook is VERY dull. Is it not possible to find something even vaguely interesting? Edwardx (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • On the contrary, I find it rather remarkable that a anyone would bother to do any kind of study on such a small stream, and that the results would actually be floating around in the internet somewhere. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Now that you explain it in context, I do see your point. But I'm not convinced that the general public will pick up on that. I've had a go at an ALT1 to try to make it clearer:
  • ALT1 ... although only 1.5-mile (2.4 km) long, Oxbow Inlet's silica, iron, magnesium, calcium, and sulfate concentrations were measured in 1966?
  • ALT1 is okay, but it might be better if it mentions what was measured (especially as some are strictly speaking elements, not minerals). --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 22:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you Jakob for your helpful comment. I have adjusted ALT1 in line with that. Edwardx (talk) 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol voting keep.svg I wasn't planning to review this, but as no one else has, and some might think that I was or was planning to review it, I might as well. New enough. Long enough. NPOV. AGF on the hook fact and citation as the excerpt available online does not fully confirm it, but I see no reason to doubt it. Article is well-cited and all paras have cites. Dup detector found no close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. Earwig returned a score of only 1%. Edwardx (talk) 13:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)