Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (Italicize (pictured))
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 2)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from May 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=May 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor====
 
====Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
[[File:Swamp Ghost at Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor.jpg|100x100px|[[Boeing]] [[B-17E Flying Fortress]] nicknamed the "[[Swamp Ghost]]"]]
 
[[File:Swamp Ghost at Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor.jpg|100x100px|[[Boeing]] [[B-17E Flying Fortress]] nicknamed the "[[Swamp Ghost]]"]]
</div><!-- 
+
</div>
 
+
* ... that the remains of the [[Swamp Ghost]] ''(pictured)'' are being restored at the '''[[Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor|Pacific Aviation Museum]]''' on [[Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam|Pearl Harbor]]?
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
+
:*Reviewed [[Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Wonderlick]].--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 01:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 
 
-->
 
* ... that the remains of the [[Swamp Ghost]] ''(pictured)'' are being restored at the '''[[Pacific Aviation Museum]]''' on [[Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam|Pearl Harbor]]?
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
:*
 
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:TParis|TParis]] ([[User talk:TParis|talk]]). Self nominated at 01:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:TParis|TParis]] ([[User talk:TParis|talk]]). Self nominated at 01:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
+
:* <u>'''The following has been checked in this review by Maile'''</u>
* {{DYKmake|Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor|TParis}}
+
:* QPQ completed by TParis
-->
+
:*Article created  by Alohafromtim on December 11, 2006 and was 410 characters (0 words) "readable prose size" before expansion
*Checked [[Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Wonderlick]].--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 01:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
+
:*5X expansion by TParis on May 13, 2014 brought it to 10566 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
:* <!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. -->
+
:*Has not appeared on DYK previously
 
+
:*Currently GA nominee and stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags, no outstanding talk page issues, and no external links used as inline sources
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:*Every paragraph sourced, both online and offline
 +
:*No bare URLs
 +
:*Hook is stated in the article and sourced online
 +
:*Hook image used in the article and licensed on Commons
 +
:*Disambig links tool found no issues
 +
:*Duplication Detector spot check shows no issue of concern
 +
:* <s>External links tool found [https://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Pacific_Aviation_Museum_Pearl_Harbor One dead link]</s>
 +
::{{u|TParis}}, this is a good article and checks out except for the one dead link.  Please fix that, and we can pass this nomination. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 +
:::{{reply to|Maile66}} Thanks for the review.  I have a copy of that article on paper, but I can't find it in any archiving service or on high beam.  So I've removed the cite since I have a different cite already available online anyway.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 22:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 +
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  This nomination passes.  Good 2 go. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 23:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 +
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 21:26, 19 May 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Pacific Aviation Museum Pearl Harbor

5x expanded by TParis (talk). Self nominated at 01:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC).

  • The following has been checked in this review by Maile
  • QPQ completed by TParis
  • Article created by Alohafromtim on December 11, 2006 and was 410 characters (0 words) "readable prose size" before expansion
  • 5X expansion by TParis on May 13, 2014 brought it to 10566 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Has not appeared on DYK previously
  • Currently GA nominee and stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags, no outstanding talk page issues, and no external links used as inline sources
  • Every paragraph sourced, both online and offline
  • No bare URLs
  • Hook is stated in the article and sourced online
  • Hook image used in the article and licensed on Commons
  • Disambig links tool found no issues
  • Duplication Detector spot check shows no issue of concern
  • External links tool found One dead link
Template:U, this is a good article and checks out except for the one dead link. Please fix that, and we can pass this nomination. — Maile (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Reply to Thanks for the review. I have a copy of that article on paper, but I can't find it in any archiving service or on high beam. So I've removed the cite since I have a different cite already available online anyway.--v/r - TP 22:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)