Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Philip III of Navarre"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>KAVEBEAR
imported>Miyagawa
(Moved to prep)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2016  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 11:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Philip III of Navarre====
 
====Philip III of Navarre====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
{{main page image|image=Philip III of Navarre.jpg|caption=Stained glass window depiction of Philip|width=120x133}}
 
{{main page image|image=Philip III of Navarre.jpg|caption=Stained glass window depiction of Philip|width=120x133}}
</div><!--
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that [[Joan II of Navarre|Queen Joan II]] and '''[[Philip III of Navarre|King Philip III of Navarre]]''' ''(pictured)'' had to agree to step down when their eldest son or daughter reached majority, which chroniclers found shocking?<br><small>Source: "It was stipulated that when Juana and Philip's heir, 'whether it will be a son or daughter', reached the age of twenty-one, the couple would have to step aside or pay a hefty fine of 100,000 livres. Andre Favyn found this stipulation, indeed the very idea that subjects could place limits on their sovereigns' rule, shocking." ([https://books.google.ba/books?id=FXkhAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Queens+Regnant+of+Navarre:+Succession,+Politics,+and+Partnership,+1274-1512&hl=bs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwid79Pqh5XQAhXCiiwKHf-QAxsQ6AEIJTAA#v=snippet&q=fine&f=false])</small>
 
* ... that [[Joan II of Navarre|Queen Joan II]] and '''[[Philip III of Navarre|King Philip III of Navarre]]''' ''(pictured)'' had to agree to step down when their eldest son or daughter reached majority, which chroniclers found shocking?<br><small>Source: "It was stipulated that when Juana and Philip's heir, 'whether it will be a son or daughter', reached the age of twenty-one, the couple would have to step aside or pay a hefty fine of 100,000 livres. Andre Favyn found this stipulation, indeed the very idea that subjects could place limits on their sovereigns' rule, shocking." ([https://books.google.ba/books?id=FXkhAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Queens+Regnant+of+Navarre:+Succession,+Politics,+and+Partnership,+1274-1512&hl=bs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwid79Pqh5XQAhXCiiwKHf-QAxsQ6AEIJTAA#v=snippet&q=fine&f=false])</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that despite his subjects' reluctance to accept him as king, '''[[Philip III of Navarre]]''' ''(pictured)'' proved to be an effective and successful ruler?  <br><small>Source: "... the Navarrese were understandably keen to put specific limits to the powers of Juana II's husband." "Generally the perception of the reign of Juana II  and her husband Philip d'Evreux by both their contemporaries and modern historians has been positive." "He took kingship seriously and worked on projects such as the amejoramiento of the law code which had a long-term benefit for the kingdom." ([http://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/1491/1/E.%20C.%20Woodacre%20-%202012.pdf])</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that despite his subjects' reluctance to accept him as king, '''[[Philip III of Navarre]]''' ''(pictured)'' proved to be an effective and successful ruler?  <br><small>Source: "... the Navarrese were understandably keen to put specific limits to the powers of Juana II's husband." "Generally the perception of the reign of Juana II  and her husband Philip d'Evreux by both their contemporaries and modern historians has been positive." "He took kingship seriously and worked on projects such as the amejoramiento of the law code which had a long-term benefit for the kingdom." ([http://researchspace.bathspa.ac.uk/1491/1/E.%20C.%20Woodacre%20-%202012.pdf])</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Beatriz de la Cueva|Beatriz de la Cueva]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Beatriz de la Cueva|Beatriz de la Cueva]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) and [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] ([[User talk:Srnec|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) at 23:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) and [[User:Srnec|Srnec]] ([[User talk:Srnec|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) at 23:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Philip III of Navarre|Surtsicna|subpage=Philip III of Navarre}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Philip III of Navarre|Srnec}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Recent fivefold expansion. Hook are both referenced to reliable sources, but the "which chroniclers found shocking" of the first hook is not in the article; so I will approve of only the second hook. No neutrality or copyright issues detected and QPQ is done. --[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 23:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Recent fivefold expansion. Hook are both referenced to reliable sources, but the "which chroniclers found shocking" of the first hook is not in the article; so I will approve of only the second hook. No neutrality or copyright issues detected and QPQ is done. --[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 23:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 11:39, 3 December 2016

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 11:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Philip III of Navarre

Stained glass window depiction of Philip
Stained glass window depiction of Philip
  • ... that Queen Joan II and King Philip III of Navarre (pictured) had to agree to step down when their eldest son or daughter reached majority, which chroniclers found shocking?
    Source: "It was stipulated that when Juana and Philip's heir, 'whether it will be a son or daughter', reached the age of twenty-one, the couple would have to step aside or pay a hefty fine of 100,000 livres. Andre Favyn found this stipulation, indeed the very idea that subjects could place limits on their sovereigns' rule, shocking." ([1])
    • ALT1:... that despite his subjects' reluctance to accept him as king, Philip III of Navarre (pictured) proved to be an effective and successful ruler?
      Source: "... the Navarrese were understandably keen to put specific limits to the powers of Juana II's husband." "Generally the perception of the reign of Juana II and her husband Philip d'Evreux by both their contemporaries and modern historians has been positive." "He took kingship seriously and worked on projects such as the amejoramiento of the law code which had a long-term benefit for the kingdom." ([2])

5x expanded by Surtsicna (talk) and Srnec (talk). Nominated by Surtsicna (talk) at 23:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Recent fivefold expansion. Hook are both referenced to reliable sources, but the "which chroniclers found shocking" of the first hook is not in the article; so I will approve of only the second hook. No neutrality or copyright issues detected and QPQ is done. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)