Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pippa Wicks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joseph2302 (alt hook) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 4) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from June 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Pippa Wicks}} | {{DYK header|Pippa Wicks}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Pippa Wicks|Pippa Wicks}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Pippa Wicks|Pippa Wicks}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[Pippa Wicks]]''', the deputy [[chief executive officer]] of [[The Co-operative Group]], has supported the company's employment of victims of [[Slavery in the 21st century|modern slavery]]? <small>Source: [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/co-op-modern-slavery-human-trafficking-jobs-food-business-shops-a8167266.html]</small> | * ... that '''[[Pippa Wicks]]''', the deputy [[chief executive officer]] of [[The Co-operative Group]], has supported the company's employment of victims of [[Slavery in the 21st century|modern slavery]]? <small>Source: [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/co-op-modern-slavery-human-trafficking-jobs-food-business-shops-a8167266.html]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Pippa Wicks]]''' is scheduled to become the head of [[John Lewis & Partners]] in August 2020? <small>Source: [https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/jun/24/john-lewis-appoints-pippa-wicks-as-executive-director]</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Pippa Wicks]]''' is scheduled to become the head of [[John Lewis & Partners]] in August 2020? <small>Source: [https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/jun/24/john-lewis-appoints-pippa-wicks-as-executive-director]</small> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
:* ''Comment'': Other hooks welcome | :* ''Comment'': Other hooks welcome | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) and [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) at 22:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) and [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) at 22:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a [[WP:BLP|BLP]] about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are ''in'' modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"? [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 10:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC) | :* Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a [[WP:BLP|BLP]] about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are ''in'' modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"? [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 10:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
::* '''ALT2''': ... that '''[[Pippa Wicks]]''', the deputy [[chief executive officer]] of [[The Co-operative Group]], has supported the company's initiative to employ people who have escaped [[Slavery in the 21st century|modern slavery]]? | ::* '''ALT2''': ... that '''[[Pippa Wicks]]''', the deputy [[chief executive officer]] of [[The Co-operative Group]], has supported the company's initiative to employ people who have escaped [[Slavery in the 21st century|modern slavery]]? | ||
::* {{U|MartinPoulter}} Is ALT2 clearer? [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk)]] 10:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC) | ::* {{U|MartinPoulter}} Is ALT2 clearer? [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk)]] 10:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::* That's absolutely ideal. Great work {{ping|Joseph2302|Edwardx}} on creating this article. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 14:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:10, 23 July 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pippa Wicks
- ... that Pippa Wicks, the deputy chief executive officer of The Co-operative Group, has supported the company's employment of victims of modern slavery? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that Pippa Wicks is scheduled to become the head of John Lewis & Partners in August 2020? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Théo Maledon
- Comment: Other hooks welcome
Created by Joseph2302 (talk) and Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Joseph2302 (talk) at 22:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC).
- Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a BLP about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are in modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"?
MartinPoulter (talk) 10:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Pippa Wicks, the deputy chief executive officer of The Co-operative Group, has supported the company's initiative to employ people who have escaped modern slavery?
- Template:U Is ALT2 clearer? Joseph2302 (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- That's absolutely ideal. Great work Template:Ping on creating this article.
MartinPoulter (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- That's absolutely ideal. Great work Template:Ping on creating this article.
- Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a BLP about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are in modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"?