Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Plesiohedron"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Eppstein (ALT1) |
imported>HalfGig (prep 3) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from March 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:HalfGig|<font color="darkolivegreen">'''HalfGig'''</font>]] [[User talk:HalfGig|<font color="orangered">'''talk'''</font>]] 12:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Plesiohedron==== | ====Plesiohedron==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Plesiohedron|Plesiohedron}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Plesiohedron|Plesiohedron}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that Euclidean space can be completely filled without overlaps by copies of any '''[[plesiohedron]]''', a convex shape that can have up to 38 sides? <small>Source: [http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1980-03-03/S0273-0979-1980-14827-2/home.html Grünbaum 1980] (may be paywalled, I'm not sure). p.952: "A powerful method of constructing stereohedra [polyhedra that form symmetric tilings of space without overlaps] is by taking the Dirichlet regions of a dot pattern ... we shall call them plesiohedra". p.965: "38-faced plesiohedra".</small> | * ... that Euclidean space can be completely filled without overlaps by copies of any '''[[plesiohedron]]''', a convex shape that can have up to 38 sides? <small>Source: [http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1980-03-03/S0273-0979-1980-14827-2/home.html Grünbaum 1980] (may be paywalled, I'm not sure). p.952: "A powerful method of constructing stereohedra [polyhedra that form symmetric tilings of space without overlaps] is by taking the Dirichlet regions of a dot pattern ... we shall call them plesiohedra". p.965: "38-faced plesiohedra".</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Marjorie G. Horning|Marjorie G. Horning]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Marjorie G. Horning|Marjorie G. Horning]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough with adequate referencing. Didn't find any copyvios in the 2 sources I was able to access online. While I was not able to verify the hook to the source due to the paywall, I was able to find other sources, e.g., [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Space-FillingPolyhedron.html]. My one concern with the hook is the statement that the plesiohedron can have up to 38 sides. The largest known plesiohedron has 38 sides but in theory at least it can have up to 92. So I think the wording of the hook needs to be tweaked to say something like "...that theoretically can have up to 92 sides" or "...whose known examples have up to 38 sides" or even "...whose known examples have up to 38 sides but it might be possible to have as many as 92 sides." Though the latter may be too long. [[User:Rlendog|Rlendog]] ([[User talk:Rlendog|talk]]) 22:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough with adequate referencing. Didn't find any copyvios in the 2 sources I was able to access online. While I was not able to verify the hook to the source due to the paywall, I was able to find other sources, e.g., [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Space-FillingPolyhedron.html]. My one concern with the hook is the statement that the plesiohedron can have up to 38 sides. The largest known plesiohedron has 38 sides but in theory at least it can have up to 92. So I think the wording of the hook needs to be tweaked to say something like "...that theoretically can have up to 92 sides" or "...whose known examples have up to 38 sides" or even "...whose known examples have up to 38 sides but it might be possible to have as many as 92 sides." Though the latter may be too long. [[User:Rlendog|Rlendog]] ([[User talk:Rlendog|talk]]) 22:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 14: | ||
:::*'''ALT1''' ... that Euclidean space can be completely filled without overlaps by copies of any '''[[plesiohedron]]''', a type of convex shape whose known examples have up to 38 sides? | :::*'''ALT1''' ... that Euclidean space can be completely filled without overlaps by copies of any '''[[plesiohedron]]''', a type of convex shape whose known examples have up to 38 sides? | ||
:::(I think the fact that there exist shapes like this with 38 sides is more interesting and hooky than the fact that we can prove they don't have more than 92.) —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 23:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | :::(I think the fact that there exist shapes like this with 38 sides is more interesting and hooky than the fact that we can prove they don't have more than 92.) —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 23:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] That works and is short enough. 14:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 12:47, 9 March 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 12:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Plesiohedron
- ... that Euclidean space can be completely filled without overlaps by copies of any plesiohedron, a convex shape that can have up to 38 sides? Source: Grünbaum 1980 (may be paywalled, I'm not sure). p.952: "A powerful method of constructing stereohedra [polyhedra that form symmetric tilings of space without overlaps] is by taking the Dirichlet regions of a dot pattern ... we shall call them plesiohedra". p.965: "38-faced plesiohedra".
- Reviewed: Marjorie G. Horning
Created by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 21:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC).
- 16px Article is new enough and long enough with adequate referencing. Didn't find any copyvios in the 2 sources I was able to access online. While I was not able to verify the hook to the source due to the paywall, I was able to find other sources, e.g., [1]. My one concern with the hook is the statement that the plesiohedron can have up to 38 sides. The largest known plesiohedron has 38 sides but in theory at least it can have up to 92. So I think the wording of the hook needs to be tweaked to say something like "...that theoretically can have up to 92 sides" or "...whose known examples have up to 38 sides" or even "...whose known examples have up to 38 sides but it might be possible to have as many as 92 sides." Though the latter may be too long. Rlendog (talk) 22:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, how about
- ALT1 ... that Euclidean space can be completely filled without overlaps by copies of any plesiohedron, a type of convex shape whose known examples have up to 38 sides?
- (I think the fact that there exist shapes like this with 38 sides is more interesting and hooky than the fact that we can prove they don't have more than 92.) —David Eppstein (talk) 23:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- 16px That works and is short enough. 14:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
